homepage

The Expanse

Posted By: Raw Kryptonite

The Expanse - 12/13/19 06:13 PM

Season 4 is out today on Amazon!
Guess I'll watch it and then start all over again including the new one. They all benefit from extra viewings. thumbsup
Posted By: PanzerMeyer

Re: The Expanse - 12/13/19 06:25 PM

Originally Posted by Raw Kryptonite
They all benefit from extra viewings. thumbsup



Any sci-fi series with character and serialized story depth most certainly deserves more than one viewing. There's just no way you can catch everything in one viewing.
Posted By: letterboy1

Re: The Expanse - 12/13/19 08:50 PM

I'm glad I saw this (and that I have Amazon Prime). I'm making it a point to check this out tonight. Thanks, ya'll. smile
Posted By: JimK

Re: The Expanse - 12/14/19 05:41 AM

Had the time today to binge watch the entire series, You will not be disappointed at all and even more anxious to see the next season. Set it up Perfectly. God I love this show.
Posted By: letterboy1

Re: The Expanse - 12/14/19 03:00 PM

I'm in episode 1 of season 1 and this is soooo good! I already have a new term in my vocabulary - "Flip and burn." Okay, I will now return to what will surely be a binge. I'm off work until January 2 so no problemo! smile
Posted By: Mr_Blastman

Re: The Expanse - 12/14/19 03:09 PM

So the whole thing is out at once?
Posted By: NH2112

Re: The Expanse - 12/14/19 03:27 PM

Originally Posted by letterboy1
I'm in episode 1 of season 1 and this is soooo good! I already have a new term in my vocabulary - "Flip and burn." Okay, I will now return to what will surely be a binge. I'm off work until January 2 so no problemo! smile


Just wait until you see the episode with the assault on the space station in season 2. Brilliant, absolutely brilliant. Probably the best space battle I’ve seen.
Posted By: Raw Kryptonite

Re: The Expanse - 12/14/19 05:05 PM

Originally Posted by Mr_Blastman
So the whole thing is out at once?


Seems to be! I thought they'd do it slowly.
Posted By: JimK

Re: The Expanse - 12/14/19 05:26 PM

Amazon Prime app on my Ipad even allowed me download the entire season 4 onto my Ipad. And even my phone.
Posted By: PanzerMeyer

Re: The Expanse - 12/15/19 03:20 AM

Originally Posted by JimK
Had the time today to binge watch the entire series, You will not be disappointed at all and even more anxious to see the next season. Set it up Perfectly. God I love this show.



You watched all 10 episodes in one day?
Posted By: PanzerMeyer

Re: The Expanse - 12/15/19 03:21 AM

Originally Posted by Mr_Blastman
So the whole thing is out at once?



Yes. Amazon Prime does the same as Netflix.
Posted By: JimK

Re: The Expanse - 12/15/19 05:35 AM

Originally Posted by PanzerMeyer
Originally Posted by JimK
Had the time today to binge watch the entire series, You will not be disappointed at all and even more anxious to see the next season. Set it up Perfectly. God I love this show.



You watched all 10 episodes in one day?


Wife is home sick, had a few mini strokes least week and overworked after and made it worse. She was resting was happy I got to watch it all.
Posted By: letterboy1

Re: The Expanse - 12/16/19 12:25 AM

"Rocinante." I remember this name from a Rush song but until now I never looked up the references. Interesting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocinante_(disambiguation)
Posted By: NH2112

Re: The Expanse - 12/16/19 01:33 AM

Don Quixote’s horse, John Steinbeck’s pickup in “Travels With Charley,” and the black hole traveling ship in Cygnus X-1 and Hemispheres. And now a former MCRN gunship.
Posted By: letterboy1

Re: The Expanse - 12/16/19 07:56 PM

Originally Posted by NH2112
Don Quixote’s horse, John Steinbeck’s pickup in “Travels With Charley,” and the black hole traveling ship in Cygnus X-1 and Hemispheres. And now a former MCRN gunship.
At least they didn't name it the Sancho Panza! biggrin
Posted By: PanzerMeyer

Re: The Expanse - 12/16/19 07:58 PM

I actually read Don Quixote back when I first started college. In English of course.
Posted By: letterboy1

Re: The Expanse - 12/19/19 02:29 PM

I'm about to start season 4. This show incredible!
Posted By: letterboy1

Re: The Expanse - 12/19/19 04:36 PM

I just noticed that on Amazon it says that season 1-4 of The Expanse is included in Amazon Prime. Does anyone know what we will have to pay for subsequent seasons?
Posted By: Raw Kryptonite

Re: The Expanse - 12/19/19 05:02 PM

Amazon owns it now, so it's all on there including the current season.
Posted By: Raw Kryptonite

Re: The Expanse - 12/20/19 01:05 AM

Btw, it got renewed for another season back in July, so more to look forward to next year.
Posted By: Ssnake

Re: The Expanse - 12/20/19 07:52 AM

a. That's great News
b. Wow, because now it gets a lot worse
c. That would mean they start the next "supercycle" with the new story arc that would last until book nine. Will we get to see nine seasons?
Posted By: PanzerMeyer

Re: The Expanse - 12/20/19 11:35 AM

Originally Posted by Ssnake
Will we get to see nine seasons?




That will all depend on how happy Amazon is with the streaming numbers.
Posted By: CyBerkut

Re: The Expanse - 12/20/19 01:28 PM

I don't know how the Return On Investment is stacking up for Amazon, but I suspect we will see another season or more. The series is very well done, and certainly deserves to continue, IMO.
Posted By: Raw Kryptonite

Re: The Expanse - 12/20/19 02:01 PM

Originally Posted by Ssnake
a. That's great News
b. Wow, because now it gets a lot worse
c. That would mean they start the next "supercycle" with the new story arc that would last until book nine. Will we get to see nine seasons?


Have to agree. I don’t care for the turn the last two books have taken, although I’d like to see the ships on screen. I liked Nemesis Games a lot, but I’ve just gone through these last books to know the lore and to be ready for whatever is done with the universe after the last book. I assume there will be another series that all of this has been a set up for.
Posted By: Mr_Blastman

Re: The Expanse - 12/26/19 04:15 PM

I'm five episodes in to Season 4 and I'm now really worried. So far, the writing is not living up to expectations and I feel that if episode 6 doesn't turn things around, the show is in trouble.

Issues so far:

The war ended in Season 3 with the discovery of the gate and all those worlds. Truce ensued.

Meng is no longer on the crew. He added such an awesome dynamic and his character really changed and evolved. That he's missing this season so far shows.

Episode 5 seemingly has become a soap-opera drama with the standoff between the two factions on the alien world--neither of which I care about. I could give a #%&*$# if the belters or the others die--I want to know about the world! But at the very end of the episode, when Holden tries to stop the two groups from killing each other, who I don't care about, he comes up with the lamest regurgitated trope excuse that is so tired in sci-fi: That the planet is trying to phone home and find its creators.

Really?

We've gone from something that almost wiped out humanity to something trying to phone home. Okay. Great. So it is trying to phone home. Leave the planet and be done with it. Nothing to see here. Humanity is saved.

The stakes are soooooooooooo low.

So what does the show do? Spends 1/4 of the episode trying to save the belter doctor. Another character I don't care about. She was shown at the beginning pressing the button that blew up the ship. That makes her complicit in murder. I don't care if she dies. And then Alex, with zero training and hardly any instruction, manages to cauterize the right organ/artery/vein/whatever that was causing her to bleed out in seconds, saving her? That violated plausibility. We wasted a bunch of time saving someone I could care less about on a world that is coming alive that to this point, have no reason to care about because the danger is so easy to fix. So they try and raise stakes by saving someone we don't care about.

I'm perturbed up until this point, but the end of the episode frustrated me the most.

When Holden came up with the phone home excuse, we leave the episode with an explosion on the planet's surface--and his explanation that everyone must leave--and at that moment the actor who's name eludes me whom is the "bad guy," reasons that maybe Holden can try and communicate with it since he has a connection to change its course.

OPPORTUNITY MISSED

If you're going to feed #%&*$# sandwiches to characters and raise stakes by putting them at risk, the only way the audience will give a #%&*$# is if characters they care about ARE AT RISK.

I think only one line of dialogue needed to be changed at the end to avert this crisis and change the course of things--although this won't fix a so far lackluster corner the show has written themselves into. The "bad guy" should have reasoned... "Oh, so you have a connection and it is trying to phone home, and you are somehow responsible for setting all this into motion due to your connection. So... if we kill you and your crew, this thing will shut up and go away and we'll be able to do what we do." Say that were said, Holden would lose his "ambassador card," because up until this point we knew he could never die, nor could his crew because of their connection to Avrasaralla. If they're implicated as the cause and his link is hazardous to humanity, well now, we have a story again.

Stakes raised. Crap sandwich fed. Characters we care about in danger. And best of all, now we want to know why. Why the connection? What the heck is going on? Because that might save Holden.

But that didn't happen. Now a bunch of people we don't care about may die on a world we don't care about. So far I'm meh this season.

Unless...

They're going for the whole Fermi Paradox explanation in that the reason we don't see alien life is because all alien life is dead because of the protomolecule and yet somehow humanity managed to not die yet there was a gate in Sol system.

I think the season has wasted too much time on two groups of characters we could care less about instead of opening a bigger door towards a future story arc we should care about.

Avrasaralla? I could care less if she loses her job. She deserves to, what after all the self-serving wickedness she's demonstrated. I'm watching her downfall in amusement. Draper, one character I do care about has set herself up for bad times and fell into the trap like a bumbling fool, but I want to see where she ends up. But no Meng. Reduced character dynamics on the Rocinante.

Sorry, I'm rambling. I feel this season is missing some important ingredients so far and instead has resorted to cheap end of episode tricks to bait us into watching the next one. Tricks that are easily resolved at the beginning of the next. What we don't have is the rising dramatic tension of previous seasons and that's because in order to have tension, as I've said several times already, the tension has to revolve around placing folks we care about at risk.


Ugh. I hope episode 6 fixes this. The season is plodding. No spoilers please.
Posted By: NH2112

Re: The Expanse - 12/26/19 05:24 PM

All I’m going to say is the book was kinda boring as well, IMO.

Mei was rescued so she and Prax are on Ganymede, where he’s helping to rebuild.
Posted By: Mr_Blastman

Re: The Expanse - 12/26/19 05:34 PM

Yeah, NH, true. I mean, if they /are/ going for the whole Fermi Paradox reveal that all life in the galaxy is dead due to the protomolecule and only humans and Earth are left alive--as implausible as this is that Earth were insulated, then they should and should do this soon, and and divert the focus from the planet and the silly conflict on it, and instead focus on human greed and the potential we could wipe ourselves out leaving all life in the entire Galaxy gone.

Those are stakes.

Right now the show has no stakes. Seems the novel might be the same way, too.

Writing a series of novels as long as the Expanse--what, working on a 9th one now, is a hugely difficult undertaking, because they run the risk of falling into the three act structure themselves, three for act one, three for two, and three for three, whereas the middle of a novel, or act two, traditionally can be the "lull" and three novels of lull, or even one for that matter, is never a good thing. This is why you often see lengthy series taking place in several different time periods--to avoid this trap.

I've not read any of the Expanse books, but seems my impression isn't far from what you indicate, that they fell into the "lull" trap and that's a nasty gambit to take.
Posted By: Raw Kryptonite

Re: The Expanse - 12/26/19 05:44 PM

Keep watching, they're just slow to get around to the meat. Agreed, TOO slow.
I finished it last night. It's been a good (not great) season. I think it was much better on screen than it was in the book. Honestly, I found the book dull. It was very "small" after the grand scale we've been dealing with. The greatness of those first 2-3 books/seasons doesn't come back that I've seen, but can still make for a good show.

I agree about Prax being missing stands out. Here and in the book he's returned to work since he has his daughter and his skills are needed. I think Amos makes a reference to him later, even if not by name, but I can't remember the context since it didn't click at the time. Similarly, Fred Johnson and Anderson Dawes. Dawes has been pretty much missing since that first season. Same in the books, he gets left behind by events, but still, they could've improved in that areas. Both are around in name only, pretty much. These characters aren't done yet, but would've been a good area for the series to smooth things out where the books didn't. It reeks of budgeting or maybe timing, issues with those actors. We see one, briefly.

There are some differences from the book, as usual, but also improvements that flesh out everything nicely and provide better transition. Politically, there may be long lasting effects from this as far as settling etc, but like Blastman said...WHO CARES? Let someone else deal with that. This is a fault with the source material...it gets dull with the exception of the next book, which is one of the best IMO.

Bobbie's storyline is not from Ciboloa Burn, since she wasn't really in it. It comes from the novella following her at this time Gods of Risk. I haven't read it, so I was really excited to see this. I hope they include the others in the next seasons. Without her story, this would've really sucked.
They also give much more proper attention to one character the books just threw away like nothing, which bugged me. Major improvement.
There's a much better introduction to a fairly major character.
The events on Earth are well done. I don't think much was said in the book about Earth at the time other than the frame story with Avasarala sending the Roci, hoping Holden would "Holden-it-up" or something like that.
Ultimately, all that matters is what's in the last 2 episodes. Again, much better transition to the next book, which the books themselves always fail to do.

I'm ready for the books to come to an end. It's been stretched out too much and I don't like the direction they've taken the characters. I expect (or at least hope) this series is just a prelude to a larger story coming of a conflict with the ancient species that's got to still be out there. Surely jump a few hundred years is in order for that storyline to get started. I had hoped that we'd be seeing much more of that in this series once the gate was open than we have.


Posted By: Mr_Blastman

Re: The Expanse - 12/26/19 06:01 PM

#%&*$# it. So my intuition was right. They have fallen into the trap.

Last night when I finished Episode 5 I couldn't help but feel that this was a second draft and the writers needed to throw this into the trash and start over again. Ugh.

One of the hardest things I've had to do as a writer myself was with my last novel. I spent two and a half months writing the end of the novel, only to reach the last chapter and have dawn upon me, "Hmm. This doesn't feel right. The ending I foresaw happening can't work because it doesn't fit snugly with the pieces I'm working with."

What did I do?

I threw two and a half months of writing into the trash, proverbially. I then took a two week break to contemplate, and during that period an idea dawned upon me--an epiphany, based off a simple question I had asked myself, "I wonder what happened here?" So I wrote it out and one thing lead to another, and I ended up taking bits and pieces of what I originally wrote, wove some of those scenes in between the answer to the question I asked which involved entirely different characters and scenes, and voila, three months later I arrived at the last chapter and everything clicked like magic.

But that required me to swallow my pride and realize the words I had first written were crap and not worthy of the story they were written for.

This season feels like that. And Raw Kryptonite, you just confirmed my fears in the latter half of your post. #%&*$# it all.
Posted By: Raw Kryptonite

Re: The Expanse - 12/26/19 10:27 PM

Much of the reason I read the books, at this point, is just to see how it ends up when the last one comes out. It's not like you can skip. At this point, I get far more enjoyment from the show than the books. I still think the show is incredible overall, but not it seems hamstrung by the source material it has to draw upon.
Posted By: Ssnake

Re: The Expanse - 12/27/19 09:22 AM

While I wasn't too hot for the fourth book myself, at least book five kicks off with a H0ly Sh!t moment and is, indeed, one of the best. But I liked the following books; they were a plausible expansion of what would happen with the protomolecule (and Dr. Cortazar) around, and the ending of book eight is promising. Book four was slightly problematic in that it tried to use Illus as the model case of the mad land rush of expanding to other worlds; 1300 empty planets, after all, and what that means for Mars. That part of the book worked; the human aspect and reader's care for the characters - not to the extent that they had managed to pull off in previous novels. Having an actual psychopath with the law on his side as an adversary may have sounded like a great concept, but was enormously frustrating.

For me at least the good news was that book four was the low point, and it got better again afterwards, rather than a drawn-out decline where every following book gets progressively worse.
Posted By: Ssnake

Re: The Expanse - 12/30/19 09:19 AM

After binge-watching season four over the weekend together with household six I must say that while it wasn't the greatest of all Expanse seasons, still they did an adequate job of cutting/simplifying the lengthy parts from the book, and preparing the coming season (maybe a bit too much). Overall I think season four improved over the book, which is, I think, all you can hope for while still trying to stay faithful to the original. Personally I wish they would have given more depth to the science side of things, but given that some in this thread found this installment "plodding" already I suppose the show's writers' instinct was right.
Posted By: Mr_Blastman

Re: The Expanse - 01/02/20 02:20 AM

Finished the season last night.

Ssnake: I wouldn't have minded more depth on the science side. My issue was the plot focused on groups of meaningless people using tired plot devices with little to no payoff in the end. Greater depth into the science side of things might have helped immensely.

The season was okay, but felt more like a mid-tier run of the mill drama than the Expanse we have all grown to love.
Posted By: NH2112

Re: The Expanse - 01/02/20 03:31 AM

I don’t remember there BEING much in the way of science in the book. It was mainly the hostility of Ilus to human life, Holden trying to play politician for 2 groups of people who didn’t want to be politicked to, and dealing with whatever surprises the protomolecule had waiting for them.
Posted By: Ssnake

Re: The Expanse - 01/02/20 10:00 AM

I was referring to the fact that they had three distinct biologies parallel on that planet - the protomolecule leftovers, 1.5 billion years of natural evolution on Illus, and then of course everything that the humans brought with them. That eye parasite was but the first incident of interaction between Illus and Terran biology, and it was worth at least a few pages in the book; in the TV series maybe two or three dialog lines.

Well, I suppose we have to file the season as OK-ish to bring the first half of the protomolecule story to an end. The next season
will bring the apocalypse,
should definitely ratchet up the tension again.
Posted By: Mr_Blastman

Re: The Expanse - 01/02/20 05:25 PM

Well, I resumed watching Dexter season 6 last night, and after the episode was finished my thoughts on season 4 of the Expanse were both confirmed and cemented.

Season 4 was ho-hum blah.

Bad guy on New Terra - cookie-cutter one-dimensional rent-a-baddie.
Belter doctor/nurse/whatever terrorist lady - cookie-cutter one-dimensional MacGuffin cog
Belter doctor daughter + belters on planet - cookie-cutter one-dimensional plot pawns

RCE ship falling from orbit without power - tired plot device
daughter mad at mother who might die - tired plot device
rent-a-baddie versus Amos - COULD have been cool had rent-a-baddie been developed and actually showed us he was a true badass baddie, but he didn't
razorblade swarm - durrrr happened but then was not explained and didn't matter because humans happened and things happened and oh the planet was left with the Belters mining after all with hardly a revelation other than Miller may be gone(which aside from the death of CMDR Ashford were the most significant, impactful and story relevant events that happened)
Everyone stuck in a alien structure and going blind - tired plot device revolving around plot pawns we don't care about that missed immense opportunity on scientifically analyzing the life forms.

I'd say the majority of characters introduced in this season were one-dimensional plot devices that served little to no purpose beyond moving a movie of the month plot forward.

All of this over a planet that doesn't matter because nothing that happened mattered much--and if it did, the story did an awful job of explaining why. There are what, a thousand gates to a thousand worlds? Sure, the Universe was opened, as Holden revealed they were in a different Galaxy--that was cool, but further negates whatever importance that one planet had. I see where the story might go or what things they might be reaching for, but this season felt like they fumbled the ball by giving us little more than filler without meaningful reinforcement to the end-game overarching plot. Avrasaralla losing was fitting, but Bobbie's story also had way more potential for deepening her character yet it did not. They tried to break her "good guy" mold but frankly didn't give her the additional depth she deserves. She's won us over--now give us more dimension, writers.

For those of y'all who've never seen "Breaking Bad" or "Dexter" or "Game of Thrones," I suggest you watch those. In the Dexter episode I watched last night, I got...

Multifaceted character development of not only the protagonist, but various supporting roles, chances at redemption, inner demons, metaphor, and complicated life-altering decisions and choices. The difference in quality of writing between this one episode, which wasn't even a bookend--no, was a mid-season spacer, was huge.

John Lithgow's antagonist relationship with Dexter in season 4 is a fantastic example of writing done well with tremendous stakes and consequences of actions illustrated. The mistakes made truly have an impact on the characters _and_ the viewers.

I've seen so many shows, watched so many movies, and read so many novels that perhaps I'm too jaded, but I feel we deserved better from season four of the Expanse. Shame it sounds like the novel was just as drab. I have hope though, and thank you for sharing that things will get better in book and season five.

I could share my thoughts on this all day, but whatever. I'm not mad I saw Season 4, I just wish it could have been way more. I mean, they had a whole Universe open to them, and this is what they came up with?
Posted By: Raw Kryptonite

Re: The Expanse - 01/02/20 06:49 PM

It’s like the whole book is useful for filling in some info for the history of the alien races a little bit, but that’s it. It should’ve been a novella instead of being forced into a full length book.

I still think the show exceeded the book, but I'm mostly looking forward to moving on with the next 2 books/seasons. After that...I don’t know. I hope they don't follow the books in certain ways with these last two books, and presumably the last one coming out. I don’t think it will go over well resulting in the show ending prematurely.
Posted By: Ssnake

Re: The Expanse - 01/02/20 10:39 PM

Originally Posted by Mr_Blastman
All of this over a planet that doesn't matter because nothing that happened mattered much--and if it did, the story did an awful job of explaining why. There are what, a thousand gates to a thousand worlds? Sure, the Universe was opened, as Holden revealed they were in a different Galaxy--that was cool, but further negates whatever importance that one planet had. I see where the story might go or what things they might be reaching for, but this season felt like they fumbled the ball by giving us little more than filler without meaningful reinforcement to the end-game overarching plot.

Well, one crucial element that was revealed was that the ancient protomolecule civilization was eliminated by some other equally advanced foe by a device that is, literally, a blind spot to their technology, and that whatever killed those protomolecule engineers might now be after mankind, now that all the remaining gates have been reactivated.

It's hard to categorically refute your points, although I think that you are a bit harsh on them. Sure, the fourth novel was the low point of the books and now also of the TV series but I have seen much worse science fction series, so as far as (semi)hard science fiction/space opera is concerned, I couldn't name a series that I would like better. That there are other TV shows which offer better characters and more complex storylines such as Dexter's second best season is something that I won't dispute. But you're comparing The Expanse against some of the best writing that has ever been made for TV. Given the choice betwee re-watching season VII of Game of Thrones or this Expanse season, I would probably still pick The Expanse. Maybe GoT VII wasn't quite so bad as I remember it, but it was a far cry from seasons I ... V.
Posted By: Ssnake51

Re: The Expanse - 01/22/20 05:19 PM

Watched the first two episodes of this latest season but have now given up on this show. Although it was the show that originally turned me on to reading the books I just find it deviating too far from the book series. And I think overall the book series is much better than the show.
Posted By: Ssnake51

Re: The Expanse - 01/22/20 05:25 PM

Originally Posted by NH2112
I don’t remember there BEING much in the way of science in the book.


Well, the authors have stated that they were not interested in writing a hard science fiction series of books. They're aiming more for the space opera genre.
Posted By: Ssnake

Re: The Expanse - 01/22/20 05:48 PM

Originally Posted by Ssnake51
I just find it deviating too far from the book series.

Where/how?
There's an additional storyline about Bobbie on Mars, but that seems to come from a short story that the Coreys actually wrote. I find the series to add a few things earlier than they are revealed in the books (e.g. Bobbie is introduced well before "Caliban's War"/season 3), but overall I still think that it very much respects the original source material. That not every casting decision is in line how we envisaged certain characters is something that doesn't bother me too much. Frankie Adams is not a female version of The Mountain, but credit where it's due, at least she's from Samoa.
Posted By: wormfood

Re: The Expanse - 02/10/20 09:59 PM

Finally got around to watching the latest season.
My biggest complaint was they seemed to throw physics that they've normally followed out the window.
Mostly involving when they shoot a ships engines (which happens several times this season) it just comes to a complete stop like someone slammed the space brakes. At least that's what the camera would show.

Otherwise, I enjoyed it. Lack of action? Maybe. but the internal fighting in the OPA as well as shifting priorities and sentiments on Mars made for an interesting story and nice setups for the next season.
Posted By: Ssnake

Re: The Expanse - 02/10/20 10:27 PM

I always took it at the frame of reference still accelerating at a constant rate while the targeted ship immediately goes into freefall. Most of all space flight described in The Expanse is based on constantly accelerated flight, even if rapidly changing in combat situations. But maybe I wasn't paying enough attention.
Posted By: wormfood

Re: The Expanse - 02/11/20 01:39 AM

Ssnake,
I'm sure that's probably what's happening, it just doesn't look that way on the screen. To me, it just appears a bit silly.
Then again, it's a blank, black background, how else are they supposed to frame it?
Posted By: Ssnake

Re: The Expanse - 02/11/20 08:37 AM

Exactly. You can't do much to convey velocities, only relative accelerations. Then again, at the end of the day space combat in cinema and TV is drama, not an undergraduate physics course.
Posted By: Alicatt

Re: The Expanse - 09/14/20 07:08 AM

Filming for season 5 was wrapped last February, anyone know when the season is due for release?
Posted By: PanzerMeyer

Re: The Expanse - 09/14/20 11:10 AM

Originally Posted by Alicatt
Filming for season 5 was wrapped last February, anyone know when the season is due for release?



I don't but if Amazon hasn't posted anything official yet on their website then no one will know until they do so.
Posted By: Alicatt

Re: The Expanse - 09/14/20 05:15 PM

Originally Posted by PanzerMeyer
Originally Posted by Alicatt
Filming for season 5 was wrapped last February, anyone know when the season is due for release?



I don't but if Amazon hasn't posted anything official yet on their website then no one will know until they do so.

After the hype from before last season's premier I wondered if I had missed something.
Not been gaming or watching much TV of late so it could have easily passed me by
Posted By: Alicatt

Re: The Expanse - 09/14/20 07:06 PM

And this just popped up: announcing Book 9 of the Expanse

Quote
Join James S. A. Corey (Daniel Abraham and Ty Franck) this Wednesday at 11 AM PDT/2 PM EDT for an exciting announcement about book 9 of the #Expanse series!

After the announcement, the authors will take questions from the audience. Register here: http://ow.ly/NDkO50Bqspg


https://www.crowdcast.io/e/expansebook9/register
Posted By: EAF331 MadDog

Re: The Expanse - 10/09/20 04:59 AM

Season 5 trailer

Posted By: Trooper117

Re: The Expanse - 10/09/20 11:16 AM

I cannot wait!
Posted By: Alicatt

Re: The Expanse - 10/09/20 02:09 PM

Oh Goody!
looking forward to this
Posted By: Mr_Blastman

Re: The Expanse - 10/09/20 03:15 PM

Hopefully season 5 will be a return to the quality and great showmanship of previous seasons. Season 4 was so lackluster, but as others have explained here, the book season 4 was based on was pretty bad, too.
Posted By: Alicatt

Re: The Expanse - 10/09/20 05:25 PM

Oh if it is like the book and they add in a bit more of Amos' Churn back story then it could be very good and quite dark. I did struggle reading the Nagata/Inaros arc in the books and had to go back and re-read it to get the events straight in my head
Posted By: JimK

Re: The Expanse - 10/17/20 11:25 PM

Season 5 trailer just released by Amazon prime.

Posted By: NH2112

Re: The Expanse - 12/20/20 06:00 PM

Originally Posted by Mr. Blastman
All of this over a planet that doesn't matter because nothing that happened mattered much--and if it did, the story did an awful job of explaining why.


Just revisiting this thread because season 5 is here (I haven’t started it yet) rather than the new thread. Referencing your quote, no, Ilus/New Terra didn’t matter...except to the people who were trying to make a life there. To them their own little itty bitty piece of the universe matters quite a bit, and the whole series (books and TV) puts the spotlight on the little itty bitty people and things as they’re doing things that affect the great big whole. Not perfectly, almost always without enough information, and sometimes out of naïveté.
Posted By: Trooper117

Re: The Expanse - 12/20/20 07:03 PM

I'm going to watch it regardless... I've enjoyed the whole series so far.
Posted By: JimK

Re: The Expanse - 12/23/20 03:52 AM

Episode 4 released today. Change of command comes quick.
Posted By: PanzerMeyer

Re: The Expanse - 12/23/20 12:13 PM

Do you guys have any theories on why the Expanse never became a "water cooler" show? I remember the marketing and hype for the show before season 1 aired on SyFy was pretty intense. Maybe the show is just too "intellectual" and "slow" for the mainstream audience?
Posted By: JimK

Re: The Expanse - 12/25/20 03:10 AM

Watched all 4 again. It is by far the best SciFi in my subscriptions. The latest even more so.
Posted By: JimK

Re: The Expanse - 12/30/20 07:10 PM

Episode 5 is out.
Posted By: NH2112

Re: The Expanse - 01/24/21 01:12 PM

I’m not sure I like the new Naomi, when did she get so weepy and emotional?
Posted By: JimK

Re: The Expanse - 01/25/21 02:25 AM

Originally Posted by NH2112
I’m not sure I like the new Naomi, when did she get so weepy and emotional?


No kidding, getting sick of her. Last episode she took over. She is destroying the show.
Reality of space, She would have been dead for sure making that jump without a suit that distance.
Posted By: wormfood

Re: The Expanse - 01/25/21 04:18 PM

Originally Posted by JimK
Originally Posted by NH2112
I’m not sure I like the new Naomi, when did she get so weepy and emotional?


No kidding, getting sick of her. Last episode she took over. She is destroying the show.
Reality of space, She would have been dead for sure making that jump without a suit that distance.


Yeah, that scene really bugged me. I saw what they were trying to do and they did introduce that autoinjector with oxygenated blood an episode or two earlier. Problem is, when exposed to the vacuum of space, you just pass out in 10-15 seconds. So she wouldn't have been conscious to either use it or operate the airlock on the other ship.
Posted By: JimK

Re: The Expanse - 01/25/21 06:48 PM

Originally Posted by wormfood
Originally Posted by JimK
Originally Posted by NH2112
I’m not sure I like the new Naomi, when did she get so weepy and emotional?


No kidding, getting sick of her. Last episode she took over. She is destroying the show.
Reality of space, She would have been dead for sure making that jump without a suit that distance.


Yeah, that scene really bugged me. I saw what they were trying to do and they did introduce that autoinjector with oxygenated blood an episode or two earlier. Problem is, when exposed to the vacuum of space, you just pass out in 10-15 seconds. So she wouldn't have been conscious to either use it or operate the airlock on the other ship.


In absolute zero temps, she would have been a brick by time hit the airlock
Posted By: NH2112

Re: The Expanse - 01/26/21 01:57 AM

Actually, without atmosphere to carry heat away from the body, overheating will happen first. You won’t freeze until after you’re dead and the body stops generating heat. Even then, it’ll take a LONG time for the heat to dissipate without convection. That’s why in the books the station at the center of the slow zone is still incandescent after being hit by the gamma ray burst (caused by something I can’t remember.)
Posted By: JimK

Re: The Expanse - 01/28/21 05:17 AM

Episode 9 was awesome. Bought time it was it was not all about Naomi Nagata.
Posted By: wormfood

Re: The Expanse - 01/28/21 11:19 PM

I don't know about awesome, but it was a step up from the last two episodes.
Posted By: JimK

Re: The Expanse - 01/29/21 05:19 AM

Originally Posted by wormfood
I don't know about awesome, but it was a step up from the last two episodes.


I hear ya.
Posted By: NH2112

Re: The Expanse - 02/04/21 02:53 AM

I thought that was a very good season finale, even with the “I’m a leaf on the wind” surprise that I don’t remember happening in the books.
Posted By: JimK

Re: The Expanse - 02/06/21 02:25 AM

Beyond the Ring Gate will get interesting now.
Posted By: Falstar

Re: The Expanse - 02/06/21 04:38 AM

Not to give too much away... Did they kill him off in the book? I'm sad.
Posted By: JimK

Re: The Expanse - 02/08/21 01:24 AM

Originally Posted by Falstar
Not to give too much away... Did they kill him off in the book? I'm sad.



Alex ??
Posted By: Nixer

Re: The Expanse - 02/13/21 04:31 AM

Stayed away from this thread until I watched it all.

Enjoyed the heck out of it, and loved the ending.

Sorry, not a drama critic, in fact, lack of BS drama made me like it more.
Posted By: Mr_Blastman

Re: The Expanse - 04/26/21 04:02 PM

I watched first episode last night...

This gonna be gud.
Posted By: JimK

Re: The Expanse - 04/29/21 03:29 AM

Originally Posted by Nixer
Stayed away from this thread until I watched it all.

Enjoyed the heck out of it, and loved the ending.

Sorry, not a drama critic, in fact, lack of BS drama made me like it more.


Was no different, the lack of safety tie downs while on EV`s was not a good write in
For it though.
Posted By: Mr_Blastman

Re: The Expanse - 05/06/21 04:56 PM

One episode left, I have seen the first nine, and a few things that bother me about this season, which has overall been great:

1) Naomi magically warning Holden that the reactor on the Rocinante is booby trapped from across the solar system, just as he is about to power it on. That was cheap writing.

2) Naomi figuring out the wire she needed to cut transmission of the second booby trapped ship's message that she was stowaway on. Think about this, for a moment... If she knew the wire to cut to stop transmission, one would know...
a) That the internal signal from recorder to transmitter inside the wiring is not encrypted
b) There's a pretty good chance this is an analog signal and not digital, given how it recovers instantly and there is no garble at the leading or trailing edges

So therefore, being one of the smartest folks in the 'verse, she would have been able to conclude that this data pathway could easily be interfaced with a microphone, allowing her to make a direct transmission in her own words using the makeshift mic she had already fabricated with the helmet. She had to have known that Marco would have found her out quickly, the moment she began manipulating the transmission, so why not say what she wanted to say?

Secondly, if she had figured out the pathway from the transmission equipment, one could also reason she would have found the pathway to cut external control. She knew she was expendable at this point, so her choice of going back and forth while choking due to lack of oxygen, over and over, is questionable.

3) The directing has taken a noticeable step backwards in this season. In the past, there was exposition through the likes of Miller. I know what's going on--I'm aware of nuclear winter on Earth due to the asteroid impacts and dust being sent into the atmosphere, but there's no direct mention of this by any of the characters or even society. The winter "just is," and ordinary viewers might not connect the dots. Likewise, hearing an inner monologue from Naomi rather than her poopy grunt faces of pain while she's wrestling with what to do during her whole ordeal may have enhanced the experience immensely.

I like this season, I just feel it could have been better so far. One more episode to go. smile
Posted By: rollnloop.

Re: The Expanse - 05/07/21 08:07 AM

But she did a monologue, you just don't speak her language.

hnnnnnnnnn raaaah oooooooooh hnnnnnnnnn uuuuuuuuugh means "situation normal, all f up. No worries, I'll figure it out." hahaha
Posted By: Mr_Blastman

Re: The Expanse - 05/07/21 03:52 PM

Alex being killed off was BS! The budget committee had to make room for a new character, though, so someone had to go. frown

TOTAL

BULL

SHEET


He hasn't died in the books, and the incident was cheaply written by gradeschool level scripters. This is absolutely, 100% a budgetary decision, as one could tell through much of the season with little details here or there. Amazon may have saved the show, but they're scrimping on the pennies. Take the airlock scene where they space the guy in retribution for the belter betrayal--there's no gust of atmosphere, no billowing of clothes, simply doors casually opening and the guy beginning to gasp for air.

Words do not described how pissed I am here.


I'm not writing the show off, as the next season may be full of popcorn, but these ass hats running the series need to check themselves and stop trying to do fancy pants nonsense like the Game of Thrones showrunners did when they ran out of source material. Alex didn't need to die.


I feel the quality of directing and writing was not up to season 1/2/3 quality, and the tension was poorly conveyed compared with how they did in the past. Overall, this was a better season than season four, but I felt they held back and didn't put as much effort in as they could have. There are numerous instances where the attention to detail we've grown accustomed to was ignored and Hollywood "because" emerged, instead of hard sci fi physics.
Posted By: Mr_Blastman

Re: The Expanse - 05/07/21 04:08 PM

Hmm, seems they killed him off due to sexual misconduct allegations that surfaced after shooting wrapped. That explains the lameness that followed the still they edited in of him when he was removed from the show.
Posted By: Mr_Blastman

Re: The Expanse - 05/07/21 05:50 PM

Originally Posted by JimK
Originally Posted by NH2112
I’m not sure I like the new Naomi, when did she get so weepy and emotional?


No kidding, getting sick of her. Last episode she took over. She is destroying the show.
Reality of space, She would have been dead for sure making that jump without a suit that distance.


This study might interest you:

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19660005052/downloads/19660005052.pdf

and for further reading:

http://www.geoffreylandis.com/vacuum.html

Quote

In absolute zero temps, she would have been a brick by time hit the airlock


FYI not exactly. Space is a near perfect insulator, where heat buildup on spacecraft is a very real nightmare. As our bodies are concerned, the only way we'd technically lose heat in space while naked is fluids being lost, gasses exhaled, or blackbody radiation(IR) which is slow to release energy, especially while clothed. We would not freeze instantly into a solid chunk of frozen flesh.
Posted By: Nixer

Re: The Expanse - 12/26/21 01:25 AM

I for one would choose that over say, surfing in a white shark protected CA seal populated beach.

Anyway, The Expanse is back I just noticed. Now that Bezos is a true space traveler, LOL, no doubt he will have some kind of horrid input.
Posted By: Mr_Blastman

Re: The Expanse - 05/06/22 03:56 PM

Well, I finished the series. The last season was directed, written, and storyboarded poorly at times. The last episode, however, was fantastic.

One of the biggest mistakes made repeatedly that reeked of amateurism was showing something happening and then ten or fifteen minutes later showing the same thing happening in a replay or recording for others to watch. An accomplished writer and filmmaker knows this is wasted screen time, and figures out far in advance how to weave all the elements together to avoid this--while increasing tension, suspense, and pacing. I'm not sure how they let this happen repeatedly, but they should not have--especially with only six episodes this season. They should have done their absolute most to economize everything, but instead they didn't and made these mistakes.

I must say I grew tired of the belter civil war conflict, as it seemed to drag on and on and at times felt like a soap opera. Gone was the brilliant flash, suspense and drama of the first two seasons. The episodes felt like they were produced by a completely different team. Maybe they were?

What _was_ interesting was the jungle planet which we saw so little of. What was going on there? What was that all about? Who were those people? THAT was interesting. THAT is what I expected a lot more of when they discovered the rings in season 3, and THAT is what we did not get much of which is a #%&*$# shame. That should have been the focus going forward, but I suppose after the lackluster(dull) season four, they had to to back to the silly human conflicts in Sol. Oh, no, the silly human conflicts never ended, because that's what even season four was about.

I expected more.

I hope someone, somewhere decided to fund subsequent seasons, as I would like to see the show depart from Sol politics and move on to bigger things. Humans will be stupid and until we drastically alter our paradigms of what we value and appreciate the most, we will continue to war, kill, maim, and cause suffering and destruction. The discovery of the rings, however, promised much more than this. I hope the next books are about that. I don't know--I have not read them. I'm hesitant to if I have to slog through constant human conflict in the fourth through the sixth.

The conclusion was nice, and I have heard time jumps way ahead in subsequent novels. That does sound promising.

So far I rate this series a *** 1/2 out of **** stars.

Posted By: PanzerMeyer

Re: The Expanse - 05/06/22 04:29 PM

Originally Posted by Mr_Blastman
Humans will be stupid and until we drastically alter our paradigms of what we value and appreciate the most, we will continue to war, kill, maim, and cause suffering and destruction.



This is like wishing that predators such as lions and gators stop eating other animals and instead start eating exclusively vegetation. Humans have innate biological and evolutionary traits that are geared towards things like competition, self-preservation and territorialism and that will never go away unless you are talking about some kind of biological re-engineering of the human species.
Posted By: wormfood

Re: The Expanse - 05/06/22 05:15 PM

There were rumors at the beginning of the year of a Laconia spinoff series that follows the goings on of the ring planets rather than the Sol system. Don't know what became of that.
Posted By: PanzerMeyer

Re: The Expanse - 05/06/22 05:26 PM

Originally Posted by wormfood
There were rumors at the beginning of the year of a Laconia spinoff series that follows the goings on of the ring planets rather than the Sol system. Don't know what became of that.


If Amazon was happy with the streaming numbers it got for the Expanse I don't see why they wouldn't be interested in a spinoff. Streaming services are usually very tight-lipped with that data though so we may never know.
Posted By: NH2112

Re: The Expanse - 05/06/22 11:18 PM

Originally Posted by wormfood
There were rumors at the beginning of the year of a Laconia spinoff series that follows the goings on of the ring planets rather than the Sol system. Don't know what became of that.


Amazon needs to cancel the midden heap known as Wheel Of Time and use its funding to develop a Laconia series. About 30 years pass between books 6 and 7 (I think), in the TV series season 5 is roughly analogous to book 6 and the intervening 30 years never happen. I’d love to see Franck & Abraham flesh Laconia out and show what happened in those 30 years.
Posted By: NH2112

Re: The Expanse - 10/25/23 01:22 AM

Originally Posted by Mr_Blastman


1) Naomi magically warning Holden that the reactor on the Rocinante is booby trapped from across the solar system, just as he is about to power it on. That was cheap writing.


I’m watching the series again and agree 100%. A much better idea IMO would be to use the fact that Naomi initially wrote the program that was installed in the Roci and it was used to destroy a civilian vessel. It seems plausible that she’d ensure the same thing couldn’t happen to any ship she’s on. Or alternately, Martian military computers would be a little more resistant to hacking. I’m sure Mars didn’t let Belters work on their military ships, design their hardware, or write the software.

And why the HELL didn’t she just strip some wire from other parts of the ship, run it from the switch she was opening & closing through the bulkhead, and do her message editing in the part of the ship with air?
© 2024 SimHQ Forums