Another four years have gone and even though it's winter, the World Cup is here again.
Qatar was always a crazy choice, but massive money's been spent to transform the nation and build the infrastructure necessary to host the event. Off-pitch issues may arise, especially in terms of accommodations and travel, and the cultural issues and human rights will be hot topics, but I ask that those things be discussed elsewhere if needed and we focus on the sporting side in this thread.
The US has a shot at making it out of the group, but it's not a sure thing. Group B is a tricky one. The roster was announced a week ago and while there were few surprises, keeper Zach Steffen was left out entirely, which was a big shock considering he was essentially 1A to Matt Turner's 1B all through the qualifying cycle. To not even be named to the squad is a big surprise. The US has a good midfield, and Turner's a steady pair of hands. The backline is solid too, but striker is a question mark, and I have zero faith in Berhalter's ability to adapt tactics and formations to counter and exploit the opposition. If plan A works they'll be fine. If they need a plan B they're in trouble.
I'm a very casual soccer fan and I only follow the WC if the US team is in it. Maybe the US team will make it as far as it did back in 2014 when they played Germany in the semi-finals. I believe that was also the year when they tied England 1-1 in their match. I remember some of our UK SimHQ members being "miffed" by that.
I'm a very casual soccer fan and I only follow the WC if the US team is in it. Maybe the US team will make it as far as it did back in 2014 when they played Germany in the semi-finals. I believe that was also the year when they tied England 1-1 in their match. I remember some of our UK SimHQ members being "miffed" by that.
In 2014 semifinal, Germany defeated Brasil in Rio de Janeiro 7 - 1, to become champion, defeating Argentina 1- 0. Just to be kicked out in the group phase in 2018
I think you are thinking of the worldcup 2010, where the US team indeed tied against England, to be kicked out by Ghana in the next stage. In turn, in 2014 you defeated Ghana in the group phase, and again were kicked out in the next stage, this time by Belgium.
I think you are thinking of the worldcup 2010, where the US team indeed tied against England, to be kicked out by Ghana in the next stage. In turn, in 2014 you defeated Ghana in the group phase, and again were kicked out in the next stage, this time by Belgium.
Thank you for that correction. Yeah it was in 2010 that the US tied England.
In the US, Fox and FS1 will carry the broadcasts I believe.
So no predictions?
I'll step out.
Brazil.
Yeah I know, quite a stretch right? After all, they've won it five times. But they have not done in 20 years. This however is going to be star number 6. The roster's strong in all phases, with an embarrassment of riches in certain positions. KK kindly put up the groups above, and Brazil's Group G is one of the weakest. Brazil will cruise to the top of the group, this will set up a round of 16 match against the second-placed team form Group H, let's say South Korea (Son runs wild). Win that and it's Spain in the quarters, Argentina in the semis (sad for Messi), and they win the World Cup final against Germany.
I always pick a dark horse too, an unfavored side to make some noise. For the past six major tournaments I've picked Belgium to be this team, and this feels like the last real shot for their golden generation.
My prediction for the US is to make it out of the group in second place where they lose to Netherlands in the round of 16. But you never know!
Now Qatar has decided that no alcoholic beverages are to be served!
This isn't true I don't think, restricted 'around the stadiums', meaning the stadium perimeter only, unless they change it again. It will still be served in the stadiums and fan zones according to the latest. But another backpedal may be coming.
Anyone have any thoughts on the football side of things?
Now Qatar has decided that no alcoholic beverages are to be served!
This isn't true I don't think, restricted 'around the stadiums', meaning the stadium perimeter only, unless they change it again. It will still be served in the stadiums and fan zones according to the latest. But another backpedal may be coming.
Anyone have any thoughts on the football side of things?
Qatar bans sale of beer at World Cup stadiums in about-face https://www.cp24.com/sports/qatar-bans-sale-of-beer-at-world-cup-stadiums-in-about-face-1.6158570?cache=yes%3FclipId%3D68597
DOHA, Qatar (AP) - Qatar banned the sale of beer at World Cup stadiums on Friday, a sudden U-turn on the deal the conservative Muslim emirate made to secure the soccer tournament with only two days to go before the opening game.
The move was the latest sign of the tension of staging the event, which is not just a sports tournament but also a monthlong party, in the autocratic country where the sale of alcohol is heavily restricted. It's also a significant blow to World Cup beer sponsor Budweiser and raised questions about how much control FIFA retains over its tournament.
When Qatar launched its bid to host the World Cup, the country agreed to FIFA's requirements of selling alcohol in stadiums - but the details were only released in September, just 11 weeks before the first kickoff, suggesting how fraught the negotiations may have been. Friday's statement from FIFA said non-alcoholic beer will still be sold at the eight stadiums, while champagne, wine, whiskey and other alcohol will be served in the luxury hospitality areas of the arenas.
Can't imagine football fans from any part of the UK or Ireland wanting to go to a game without beer
Exactly my thought. What a bloody joke. As a host county, know the fanbase that will be visiting. It's ridiculous. Keep your religious beliefs out of an international event.
Now Qatar has decided that no alcoholic beverages are to be served!
This isn't true I don't think, restricted 'around the stadiums', meaning the stadium perimeter only, unless they change it again. It will still be served in the stadiums and fan zones according to the latest. But another backpedal may be coming.
Anyone have any thoughts on the football side of things?
Qatar bans sale of beer at World Cup stadiums in about-face https://www.cp24.com/sports/qatar-bans-sale-of-beer-at-world-cup-stadiums-in-about-face-1.6158570?cache=yes%3FclipId%3D68597
DOHA, Qatar (AP) - Qatar banned the sale of beer at World Cup stadiums on Friday, a sudden U-turn on the deal the conservative Muslim emirate made to secure the soccer tournament with only two days to go before the opening game.
The move was the latest sign of the tension of staging the event, which is not just a sports tournament but also a monthlong party, in the autocratic country where the sale of alcohol is heavily restricted. It's also a significant blow to World Cup beer sponsor Budweiser and raised questions about how much control FIFA retains over its tournament.
When Qatar launched its bid to host the World Cup, the country agreed to FIFA's requirements of selling alcohol in stadiums - but the details were only released in September, just 11 weeks before the first kickoff, suggesting how fraught the negotiations may have been. Friday's statement from FIFA said non-alcoholic beer will still be sold at the eight stadiums, while champagne, wine, whiskey and other alcohol will be served in the luxury hospitality areas of the arenas.
So the peons can't have booze.
So people in luxury suites can drink ? Man I would be pissed off if I planned a trip to the World Cup. (and I don't even drink anymore) But beer and Football just go together.
PS, had to Google "Peons" I learnt a new word today.
Anyone have any thoughts on the football side of things?
That's a bit of a secondary consideration as the whole point of going to these things is a few weeks of heavy drinking in the sun away from the wife.
But, if you really want to discuss that, I suppose the first big event to interest this forum is the USA-Wales clash. I'd say Wales are strong favourites, especially if Gareth Bale is playing.
The US has every chance of winning this match. The team does not come in to the World Cup on the back of a string of good results. But they're fit and will have the full roster to select from. Due to injuries and suspensions the United States has very rarely gotten all of their first-choice eleven on the pitch at the same time, so we really don't have much to judge them on. Berhalter's formation will be key, as the US will look to control the midfield and play the ball out of the back, which honestly doesn't really suit them, but there are some managers who shape the tactics to the players, and others who shape the players to their tactics. Berhalter has his vision and sticks to it, often in spite of the suitability of the players at his disposal or the effectiveness of his tactical plans.
I'd like to see some variation of a 4-5-1 with probably Ferreira up top. Not sold on him if I'm honest but he's got a good turn of pace and if the US can give him service they could spring a surprise or two. Matches are often won and lost in the midfield and I think this is the strongest part of the US squad. They have industry, pace and technical ability, but are a bit lightweight. Tyler Adams is the pivot and he'll be tasked with breaking up the opposition's attacking moves. He's really good in this role, but lacks the size and strength to be the midfield destroyer often needed in these sorts of matches. But he has a motor and will pop up all over the pitch.
In players like Pulisic, Aaronson and Reyna they have plenty of pace, skill and creativity in the center of the park if they're on song. This will be the key for the US hopes, that these players play well, control the tempo and get the ball in to dangerous spots. The US also is handy on set pieces. For the first time in forever I like the US fullbacks, Robinson having grown in to a fine player. Dest can be great on his day, but runs hot and cold and is always near an injury it seems. The centerbacks are solid but lack pace, and Turner should get the nod in goal with Steffen at home.
In their last meeting, these teams produced a scoreless draw. Wales are a difficult prospect, and I reckon this match could go either way. The key for the US will be to control the midfield, break at pace and get the ball forward for their attackers to run on to. They aren't very effective with all eleven defenders to break down, and lack the prototypical back-to-the-goal striker. So they'll look to be dangerous in transition and counterattack, and play for corners and free kicks. If they can finish off their chances they'll be in with a shout today.
I feel obliged to support Wales since that was the patch of dirt I hit when I vacated my mother's uterus. Wales were really good 5 or 6 years ago with some key players who are probably past it by now, so not getting my hopes up.
Bellingham is going to be sold at the end of the season and they're talking about 150 million transfer fee. He's good. Liverpool are keen, as well as most of the top teams. Dortmund just keep printing it.
They sure are and the US didn't need England finding confidence ahead of their match. This result will do wonders for them, after so many questions heading in to the tournament.
They sure are and the US didn't need England finding confidence ahead of their match. This result will do wonders for them, after so many questions heading in to the tournament.
Well, let me see how the US looks against Wales. Like I said we've not really seen the first eleven on the pitch together at any point during the qualifying cycle.
I assume Ross you're asking about US-England? I'll say 2-1 England if forced to predict it now. England have more firepower than the US, but you never know and it wouldn't be the first time the US got the better of them. They CAN win, but on balance I think England have more. Of course anything can happen.
I meant against Wales v US really and agree too early to tell. Either way, wish your team good luck!
I see, I misunderstood. Honestly I don't know which team shows up today. See, I have zero faith in the gaffer, a man who's head is shaped like an egg and yet he's a blockhead at the same time. Quite the trick actually.
But seriously I don't know. Qualifying was fraught with peril and poor performances. I don't know how many lineups they used through the cycle but it had to be twenty at least. The side I expect to step on the pitch today has had little time to gel, and like I said I don't think the personnel is suited to the way Berhalter wants them to play. The US should be direct, long diagonals, balls over the top, sitting deep and countering, through balls for the attackers to run on to. But they insist on trying to be a possession team, playing out of the back without the players to do it well. It's as if direct play is beneath Berhalter's lofty vision. Yeah, I'm not a fan of the manager. It took two years to name the new boss, and this is the best they could do?
Fitness, athleticism and application have always been the way forward for the United States, who aren't going to beat the best teams with technique, triangles and tactics I don't think. Play to your strengths.
I hope the US does well in spite of him, and who knows, maybe he'll surprise me with his tactical nous. I had better hope so.
Good result for Netherlands, in group A, beating Mane-less Senegal 2-0. That 3-4-1-2 formation doesn't fit them I don't think. De Ligt seems miscast in a back three. But even without Mane, Senegal is a good side, so the result is a good one. I don't think they'll have trouble with either Ecuador or Qatar, so the hard work in the group stage is done. Now to see who finishes second I reckon.
Strange game. It seemed like the Wales tactic was to let the USA do what they wanted in the first half and tire themselves out.. Now it's a case of who scores the most against Iran or loses the least against England which determines who goes through.
The United States will feel it's two points dropped, although a draw in this match isn't the worst result. They played well enough to win, but didn't match Wales when they changed things up and it was a game of two halves. Berhalter lacks the ability to make the right tweaks to react to and exploit the changes the opposition make. If plan A works, great. But as soon as it doesn't they get caught out.
Belgians tend to get too chauvinistic over their beer while there are plenty of fine beers to be found in other countries. And many Belgian beers are mediocre at best... the most mediocre of them is actually the official sponsor of the national team LOL
NFB's notion is that everyone is in the same time zone
Some more related NFB gems when he explained the sport to us. This was a 'Football Thread" I tried to get off the ground a couple years ago. After being informed he was talking about the wrong sort of football, he laid insight like this on us, and it came to an end as what more is there to say?
"Only 3 substitutions are allowed in soccer matches per team and it's only to replace an injured player." Not true. Of course.
"Football players are the one who are the wimps, not the soccer players." Are you certain about this?
"Soccer players play the entire game, 60 minutes or 45 minutes, with only a break at halftime." The games are 90 minutes plus stoppage, but sure, they play a full game for 45 minutes. Or is it 60 minutes? Maybe it's three hours. Who knows!
What a result for Japan. I have Germany in the finals, and not on this evidence. Shocker, but then again Japan is a good side, and they've done damage in World Cups before. These sorts of results are great any time, but especially on the biggest stage. THis event could use some shaking up because the atmosphere in some matches has been rather embarrassing, hasn't it?
Belgium-Canada in a little bit. Belgium's my dark horse and let's see if they can extend their streak of disappointments. Spain having no trouble with Costa Rica, 3-nil at the mo.
In some news for Friday's US-England clash, Harry Kane is in for scans and we'll see if that has an impact on the match. England still have some good strikers, Wilson and Rashford can do the job. But Kane is great at both banging them in and spreading it around, the sort of versatility they'll miss if he is out.
That was a clear example of a coach making the right moves to change a match. They changed their tactics, from sitting deep and countering, to pressing with their subs, who brought plenty of energy. Germany didn't have an answer.
And to make Japan look even better, their fans stayed after the match to help clean up the stadium.
I believe such a phrase is said because a round ball favors no side? Chances are level. Of course such a phrase ignores the quality of the players kicking that impartial sphere. But in such things we find solace and hope. Or Canada does, I guess.
The way this tournament is going, results are in the air, round ball or not.
I believe such a phrase is said because a round ball favors no side? Chances are level. Of course such a phrase ignores the quality of the players kicking that impartial sphere. But in such things we find solace and hope. Or Canada does, I guess.
The way this tournament is going, results are in the air, round ball or not.
Yeah. We`ve seen that already haven`t we. Qualty sometimes get unexpected and surprising results.
What a result for Japan. I have Germany in the finals, and not on this evidence. Shocker, but then again Japan is a good side, and they've done damage in World Cups before. These sorts of results are great any time, but especially on the biggest stage. THis event could use some shaking up because the atmosphere in some matches has been rather embarrassing, hasn't it?
Belgium-Canada in a little bit. Belgium's my dark horse and let's see if they can extend their streak of disappointments. Spain having no trouble with Costa Rica, 3-nil at the mo.
In some news for Friday's US-England clash, Harry Kane is in for scans and we'll see if that has an impact on the match. England still have some good strikers, Wilson and Rashford can do the job. But Kane is great at both banging them in and spreading it around, the sort of versatility they'll miss is he is out.
This guy knows UK football, I agree with everything you say. Though I think they'll keep Kane on the benches. I think they'll assume they can take USA without him and let him rest. After USA first game I'm not so sure that's wise. Both attacking sides and lets face it, the game is about number of goals in the end.
I'm getting the beers (not Bud!) ready for it. I want a clean game as respect both.
I always support Spain and Germany. Both countries usually start a World Cup on a weak note and improve through the tournament. Germany is on par after the upset! haha Wow! WTF was up with Spain scoring 7 goals! That goes against precedence! haha
That second goal by Japan to defeat Germany was beautiful! And I can see why they call Soccer/Football, 'The most beautiful game.'
Canada did well in dominating first half of the match against Belgium. However, after that you can tell the Canadian national team has no effin' clue what they are doing on the pitch based on the stats! Canada will not keep going and fall to the wayside with all the others.
That's not a good result for the US, who would have been hoping for a draw. With Iran now on three points the US will have to win a game, and probably need at least a draw out of the England match and a solid win against Iran to advance.
I sense discontent in the US camp after their performance against Wales. The fact that Reyna was overlooked despite being fit is an issue, but there are only so many places in the starting eleven and subs. Maybe he gets a start today.
The US-Wales match was a big disappointment, but I could see it coming a mile away. Plan A worked great in the first half, the US controlled the play and the midfield was excellent. But Wales aren't stupid and changed tactics, brought on the target man to start playing the ball over the top of the press. At this point you need your manager to recognize how the match has changed, and in turn make his own adjustments to counter and exploit. Berhalter was all like 'duh' and the game turned on its head and he was shown to be be ineffective in managing a match. He can come up with a plan after watching tape for six months. But if and when that plan stops working there's no ability to correct course.
Just to think that the player has to have an amazing spatial ability to generate a mental picture of what is behind him in order to make a head shot goal like that. It's really dumbfounding.
Lineups submitted. The US with no changes, aside from Haji Wright getting the nod at center forward over Sargent. The US has no clear-cut first choice in this position and it's a weakness. Wright is a good choice (and Ferreira would have been too) because his pace should trouble the slow-footed England centerbacks (Maguire and Stones). But Wright also offers more of an aerial threat, and it's an interesting selection. He was no-where with the US squad throughout qualifying, was a surprise selection to the final roster and now gets a start in a massive game. That's a tough ask, but I'm hoping he takes it with both hands.
England are unchanged from the demolition of Iran.
Yeah, the US looked more dangerous but nil-nil. England seemed befuddled by the Americans' formation, but expect some tactical changes for the second half. This is what we pay you for egghead. And you couldn't afford a suit jacket or a shirt with a collar or buttons?
A draw here is fine for the US. A win would be better of course. But a draw means the US advances with a win at any scoreline against Iran.
Good result for the US. I thought they played well enough to win, but a draw is a good result and their fate is in their hands. Win and move on.
Not sure what the US is doing on corners. They got a lot of them but nothing came out of it at all. Why is there no one on the near post? The area looks barren with most of the team standing outside the box. Clog that sh!t up!
England looked bereft of ideas and their performance surprised me off the back of such a comprehensive win. I reckon whatever good vibes they had from the first game are long gone after this result. They created virtually nothing, nor did the US for that matter, but I expected more out of England in this match. Both sides lacked any sort of threat in the final third.
I'm really surprised at what I saw out of England today. Not at all the sort of performance I expected. Kane hardly touched the ball and had to come very deep to get some touches. Maguire and Stones are not good on the ball. The US were no better, mind, but everyone expected England to be the better side here, didn't they?
Southgate is a perpetual tinkerer, and it always feels like every match is an experiment, rather than identifying the best players and formation and going with it. Foden has to play more, doesn't he? I'd start him over Mason Mount anyway.
Really disappointing from Belgium today. There's no way that a side with De Bruyne, Hazard (even this version), Courtois and Lukaku should be this poor. It was a golden generation and it's all been wasted. So much for a dark horse, and they've done next to nothing at all the recent major tournaments. Not sure why I keep thinking this one will be the one. Croatia doesn't have better players than Belgium, but they play so much better.
The Martinez era has to end now, I think. He has a reputation that outstrips his accomplishments. He did OK at Championship side Swansea then went to Wigan. His Wigan teams weren't all that good, but there was one spring, I think it was 2012 or 13 where they were bad enough all year to be in the relegation zone and suddenly starting winning, beating Liverpool, United and some others in the final weeks to avoid relegation. Yeah, it was good stuff, but ignores the position they were in before. Yet that seemingly made his reputation.
He went to Everton after steering Wigan to relegation the next season and did little there before being named Belgium coach and he's had some success. Third in Brazil and top of the world rankings for a time. But all this without winning anything. Time for a change I think.
Really disappointing from Belgium today. There's no way that a side with De Bruyne, Hazard (even this version), Courtois and Lukaku should be this poor. It was a golden generation and it's all been wasted. So much for a dark horse, and they've done next to nothing at all the recent major tournaments. Not sure why I keep thinking this one will be the one. Croatia doesn't have better players than Belgium, but they play so much better.
The Martinez era has to end now, I think. He has a reputation that outstrips his accomplishments. He did OK at Championship side Swansea then went to Wigan. His Wigan teams weren't all that good, but there was one spring, I think it was 2012 or 13 where they were bad enough all year to be in the relegation zone and suddenly starting winning, beating Liverpool, United and some others in the final weeks to avoid relegation. Yeah, it was good stuff, but ignores the position they were in before. Yet that seemingly made his reputation.
He went to Everton after steering Wigan to relegation the next season and did little there before being named Belgium coach and he's had some success. Third in Brazil and top of the world rankings for a time. But all this without winning anything. Time for a change I think.
I was fully expecting Spain to shellac Germany but it ended up being a 1-1 tie.
With the surprising defeat of Japan by Costa Rica, both teams had more to lose than to gain from an over-agressive posture. As it stands now, if Spain wins vs. Japan, a German victory is enough to advance, and if Spain draws the German victory needs to be with a +2 or better score. Even with a Japanese victory the German could still afvance (in this case over Spain) - the score just needs to be +8 or better (as said earlier, they gave Brazil 7 in the semifinals 2014...)
The reason of the change is the match Austria-Germany in FIFA World Cup1982, known as the Disgrace of Gijon. Playing the last two games of each group simultaneously avoid some agreements before the game has started.
Looks good Panzer, but a Wales win or draw would be good and give the US a shot at topping the group. Come on Wales!
What a massive game for the US. Win or go home. There are so many subplots here, but from a sporting point of view it's a big test. Iran are a quality side, and could give the US fits. We've gotten nothing at all out of the striker position so far, they've hardly touched the ball. There has to be better service from midfield and better off-the-ball movement and positioning from the center forward. And who will Berhalter pick? Could he not pick a striker at all, put someone like Reyna in and play a false nine?
I said before the tournament that I wanted to see the US in some version of a 4-5-1. This was for two reasons. one, the US strength and depth is in their midfield, so get more of them on the pitch. And two, because matches are usually won and lost in the midfield, and this formation, or versions of it, allows for better midfield control and prevents getting overrun by better teams. The US has been in a 4-3-3, which when you think about it is a 4-5-1 when they don't have the ball. When they do, the wingers push further up the pitch and then it's a 4-3-3. So essentially it's the same formation with different wing instructions. And it's really worked well for them. In both of their games the US midfield has played well. For three halves out of four (excluding Wales second) they have won this battle. That they haven't turned that good play in to goals is a big problem, and they'll have to hope they find some answers today. They have to score to win.
Netherlands 2 Qatar 0 90+3 min. Is is the end of Qatar if they lose?
added::
Qatar loses and is eliminated. Ecuador loses and is eliminated. I think someone in Qatar will lose their heads. For the host nation to lose all 3 games and not advance, that's a big loss of face.
Great result for the US obviously. Netherlands is the reward.
It's a glass half-empty, glass half-full sort of thing.
One one hand, the US didn't lose a game in the group stage, and only conceded once, a penalty.
On the other hand they only scored two goals and created few real chances. Despite the possession and application, there's not much cutting edge in their attack. Set pieces, which I thought would be a strength, have instead been abysmal, and it's hard to believe that their corner routine is intentional.
But through they are, and credit to the team for playing with such determination. I don't expect a win against the Oranje, but you never know. The ball is round as they say in Norway.
They made nine changes to their starting eleven since they had already qualified. Even so, France's B team should prevail against Tunisia. In the end it didn't matter, but they could have lost the top spot, claiming it in the end only on goal difference over Australia after they beat Denmark. They still cleared it by four goals, so it wasn't really in doubt, was it? But there's also something to be said for continuity and momentum in knock out tournaments. This loss shouldn't dent France, but the football gods are fickle.
I'd agree with that if the first eleven had suffered this loss. As it is, those players had little to do with it and I reckon won't be affected. But that's sports and anything could happen.
You could be right and it's the wakeup call they didn't know they needed. France are strong enough to shrug it off and deliver on the pitch. Too much quality all over.
Do they get the second-placed team from group C? That could be Argentina or Poland. Or Mexico. Hell even the Saudis. That group is still all to play for.
France has a large tunisian population. May be that was in play as well? If France had won and Tunisia was kicked out I`m sure I wouldn`t want go out on the streets of Paris tonight.
Not surprising or novel. I remember a match between Germany and Austria where most of the action happened around the mid circle. Both teams went further in the cup.
Yup, that's how it has worked in the World Cup tournament for a long time. Needless to say, there were many people at my office yesterday who were disappointed and saddened.
... and Germany is out - and we almost took Spain with us. For a few minutes it was Japan & Costa Rica to go on, but then Germany scored again, allowing Spain to make the cut, despite their defeat against Japan..
... and Germany is out - and we almost took Spain with us. For a few minutes it was Japan & Costa Rica to go on, but then Germany scored again, allowing Spain to make the cut, despite their defeat against Japan..
I still don't quite understand how the rationale works with which teams progress and which ones don't. It should just be based on simple wins and losses in my opinion.
High drama yesterday, with Japan through and Germany out. That was a difficult one to take I am sure, but they didn't do enough to advance. That's two straight World Cups where the Germans failed to advance from their group. That fifth star will have to wait.
Originally Posted by PanzerMeyer
I still don't quite understand how the rationale works with which teams progress and which ones don't. It should just be based on simple wins and losses in my opinion.
There has to be tie breaker, or count back as I think they say across the pond. Imagine a scenario where each team in a group goes 1-1-1. Who advances? So the tie breakers determine who goes through in the event more than one team has the same number of points after the three group stage matches. In the World Cup these are
1. Goal Difference 2. Goals scored 3. Head to Head 4. Head to head goal difference 5. Head to head goals scored 6. Disciplinary record (yellow and red cards) 7. Coin flip (actually, drawing lots)
Spain's 7-0 win in the first round doomed Germany and they were eliminated on goal difference. In Russia in 2018, Senegal were sent home after being eliminated by the sixth tie breaker, disciplinary record, and are the only team ever to have suffered this fate.
Massive match for the United States today against Holland, the Dutch the Netherlands. The Netherlands are a good side, but perhaps not quite the juggernaut they've been in the past. The total football image doesn't apply to the current team I don't think, where defense might be considered their best asset. Up front there are questions, with the lineup seemingly in flux and the players not picking themselves as they might have done in the past. It will be interesting to see who Van Gaal names to the starting eleven. De Jong's been a standout in the midfield so far, but the rest of the midfield has not matched his heights.
Even so, they will be favorites against a US squad who play with conviction but little cutting edge. The US needs a much better final ball, for all of their application and hustle there's little end product. The midfield and fullbacks have been really good through the tournament I think, but clear cut chances have been scarce. If the US plays to their potential there's every chance to win this match today, but they'll need to be at their best. And we need someone to clinically finish the chances that come. And too, we could use some proper managing, with effective adjustments as the game inevitably changes, and I just don't have faith in the manager to be able to do this.
Lineups are in and it appears the Netherlands will go with their funky 3-4-1-2 formation with Depay and the in-form Gakpo up top. The US are mixing things up. Same 4-3-3, but with Pulisic on the left, Weah in the center and Ferreira gets his first action on the right. That's a lot of pace up front for the US and they'll be hoping to sit on shoulders and run in behind the back three of the Netherlands. Interesting tweak here by Berhalter and I rather like it. A back three can be exploited with overlaps from the fullbacks and I think the US will look to take advantatge here.
Massive match for the United States today against Holland, the Dutch the Netherlands. The Netherlands are a good side, but perhaps not quite the juggernaut they've been in the past. The total football image doesn't apply to the current team I don't think, where defense might be considered their best asset. Up front there are questions, with the lineup seemingly in flux and the players not picking themselves as they might have done in the past. It will be interesting to see who Van Gaal names to the starting eleven. De Jong's been a standout in the midfield so far, but the rest of the midfield has not matched his heights.
Even so, they will be favorites against a US squad who play with conviction but little cutting edge. The US needs a much better final ball, for all of their application and hustle there's little end product. The midfield and fullbacks have been really good through the tournament I think, but clear cut chances have been scarce. If the US plays to their potential there's every chance to win this match today, but they'll need to be at their best. And we need someone to clinically finish the chances that come. And too, we could use some proper managing, with effective adjustments as the game inevitably changes, and I just don't have faith in the manager to be able to do this.
Lineups are in and it appears the Netherlands will go with their funky 3-4-1-2 formation with Depay and the in-form Gakpo up top. The US are mixing things up. Same 4-3-3, but with Pulisic on the left, Weah in the center and Ferreira gets his first action on the right. That's a lot of pace up front for the US and they'll be hoping to sit on shoulders and run in behind the back three of the Netherlands. Interesting tweak here by Berhalter and I rather like it. A back three can be exploited with overlaps from the fullbacks and I think the US will look to take advantatge here.
I predicted 2-1 USA and even though Netherlands just scored I stand by it fingers crossed. Really like the current USA team. Pulisic is brilliant when he gets the chance.
Poor result today, and a round of 16 exit was probably about right. Disappointing, but objectively i didn't expect the US to get a win today. You're not going to win too many matches against quality opposition with that sort of defensive positioning. Pulisic should have done better with that early chance, but otherwise they again had too few chances from all that hard work and good play. They rarely look dangerous in the final third.
Well that's sealed it. Gutted for them as they play so well.
'
We appreciate the support. Yeah, it's too bad. I think the US played well enough to show the world we have good players. But we are still some way from being a team that can contend on the international stage. Hosting the tournament in 2026 is a great chance for this squad to make that next step. Another cycle, and four years to find the striker we need so desperately. Strikers score goals, and the US can use some of that. But aside from banging them in, a top class center forward also impacts the match off the ball with movement and well-timed runs, and leads the press. A good center forward will create more scoring chances and open up space for other attackers by drawing defenders out of position. We really had none of this in Qatar. All the good midfield play resulted in so little end product, the possession coming to an end when they just appear to run out of space or run in to dead ends.
This US squad was the second-youngest US WC squad ever. We have four years to fill the holes and show up as hosts in 2026 with a real shot at doing some damage with a player core in their primes.
Back to the World Cup. Congrats to France who are looking like the best side in Qatar. They suffered so many injuries in the run up to the tournament (Kante, Benzema, Pogba, Nkunku, Kimpembe, etc) that I thought they would suffer. But man, what depth. They haven't missed a beat, and are flying. it helps to have players like Mbappe of course, but what about Giroud? Everywhere he goes he scores goals, yet has always been underrated. And now he is France's all time leading scorer, passing Thierry Henry in the record books. That's remarkable for a player who no one seems to rate. Congrats to him. What an achievement.
That was a good performance from England. I said earlier that Foden should be starting every game, and they sure look more dangerous with him on the pitch. The match with France should be a good one. I think France have a little more, but if England play like they did yesterday you never know. Senegal were disappointing after the first ten minutes, but that doesn't take away from the England performance. Getting to the quarters would have been the minimum expectation and it gets much harder from here.
Congrats to Morocco.For a scoreless match that was some high drama.
Spain were shockingly disappointing, but they have four years to work it out now. The Moroccan fans have been amazing in Qatar, the team plays with determination and not a little skill and that was great to watch.
Dropping Ronaldo to the bench was brave from the Portgual boss. But after his tantrum and poor play, the move was self-evident. It still took guts, and I won't go so far as to say the way Portugal played yesterday was because Ronaldo was not in the side. But I can suggest it haha. Regardless of whether their improved play was because of his absence, it will be difficult to bring him back in after such a display. They were rampant, and suddenly look like serious contenders.
I am new to soccer. I've watched a few games this year on FOX and there were occasions where I thought what the Fuk the announcers are saying or shut up so we can concentrate on the play on the field. During the US Iran game one of the announcer blabbered on and it muted out the game play and the crowd noise and the play by play call. Or when they cut to the lady reporter on the sideline to get her report on interviewing the players and coaches at half time and she also blabbered on and the camera is staying on her instead of on the game that's going on behind her.
The announcers are trash. That article spared Mo Edu, and good thing, because I was getting ready to defend him after reading the piece, but he was not singled out. He's good and I like him.
"delivered his signature rants with all the enthusiasm of someone who’s blown past the discomfort of knowing that no one else on set finds him interesting or funny"
Bang. I know Alexi Lalas. We both attended Rutgers University at the same time, ran in the same circles and hung out at the same parties and frat houses. He was a d-bag then, except with much worse hair. He doesn't belong on our broadcasts, but there he is every time. Why, exactly, do they keep bringing him back?
Dellacamera has a very annoying habit of over-pronouncing anything that isn't American. Adding syllables and inflections to sound worldly. It fails.
I also know Stu Holden. I used to date a girl who lived in Sugarland, Texas, and Stu was her neighbor. Nice guy. Was playing for Bolton at the time and had broken his leg. But just non-stop jabbering through the match. Hard to dislike the guy, but I don't want to listen to him when watching footie.
Give me Sky's football coverage every time over the nonsense the US broadcasters serve up.
The announcers are trash. That article spared Mo Edu, and good thing, because I was getting ready to defend him after reading the piece, but he was not singled out. He's good and I like him.
"delivered his signature rants with all the enthusiasm of someone who’s blown past the discomfort of knowing that no one else on set finds him interesting or funny"
Bang. I know Alexi Lalas. We both attended Rutgers University at the same time, ran in the same circles and hung out at the same parties and frat houses. He was a d-bag then, except with much worse hair. He doesn't belong on our broadcasts, but there he is every time. Why, exactly, do they keep bringing him back?
Dellacamera has a very annoying habit of over-pronouncing anything that isn't American. Adding syllables and inflections to sound worldly. It fails.
I also know Stu Holden. I used to date a girl who lived in Sugarland, Texas, and Stu was her neighbor. Nice guy. Was playing for Bolton at the time and had broken his leg. But just non-stop jabbering through the match. Hard to dislike the guy, but I don't want to listen to him when watching footie.
Give me Sky's football coverage every time over the nonsense the US broadcasters serve up.
Dbond,
I know the BBC are quite dividing but their sport coverage is pretty good.
Gary Lineker is pretty good at presenting.
Not sure if you can get via VPN or BBC America but maybe worth a shot. ITV is also pretty sound for world cup coverage.
We have poor coverage of American Football over here. Shame as love the game.
Thanks Ross. Thing is, I want to watch it on my brand new OLED. Maybe I could use the smart side of the TV to find alternative coverage, and I don't want to watch the matches streamed on the PC. That's a 32" curved display, which is pretty nice, but half the size of the TV.
And besides, I could then not complain about the broadcasting team
If you want the ultimate example of over the top soccer commentators look no further than Telemundo. Living in Miami it's unfortunately impossible to stay away from that network if you have any interest in the sport.
I watch the Champion's League in Spanish and hardly understand a word of it. No english-speaking channel carries the UCL anymore on my FIOS. So I watch the spanish channel. I don't need to understand them anyway, and even if I did I would probably just complain about how bad they are.
I'm going for 2-1 to France. I so hope I am wrong.
If I were putting money on it I'd agree and go with France. They play a more expansive football, higher tempo. I think England might have problems containing the French attack. I expect Mbappe to gives a Stones/Maguire pairing fits. As good as Mbappe has been, two other players have really impressed me in this WC for France. Rabiot and Griezmann. Rabiot has taken his chance with both hands after Kante and Pogba were ruled out. And Griezmann has looked a new player, even in this new role. Lloris though is always near a howler so we will see.
Knockout games are usually won and lost in the midfield and this battle could go either way. Bellingham has had a fantastic tournament and his price tag is rising with every match. So for me it will be down to tactics and being clinical with the chances that fall. Let's see who Southgate names in the starting eleven. Foden has to start. But the midfield is up in the air I think.
Argentina nukes Netherlands and will fight Croatia next Tuesday.
You really need to look up the meaning of the word "fight". You keep using it, and does in no way apply to soccer. Do you describe a tennis match as a fight ?
Argentina nukes Netherlands and will fight Croatia next Tuesday.
You really need to look up the meaning of the word "fight". You keep using it, and does in no way apply to soccer. Do you describe a tennis match as a fight ?
I think he means the fans afterwards, or maybe during....or both.
I was afraid the Dutch were invading the Balkans. It's not that?
Smash and grab for Morocco? Less than 30% of the ball and the lead. This is why we play 'em! Hakimi has been excellent all tournament. Morocco's just a plucky underdog that doesn't quit. Still time, but what a result this would be, Morocco in the semis! Their fans deserve nothing less.
Argentina nukes Netherlands and will fight Croatia next Tuesday.
You really need to look up the meaning of the word "fight". You keep using it, and does in no way apply to soccer. Do you describe a tennis match as a fight ?
I think he means the fans afterwards, or maybe during....or both.
That would make more sense haha.
Speaking of which, looks like there was some shenanigans in Boston last night. Turn on sound. Take note of the 17 second mark. BTW, the guy in the higher seats always has a massive advantage.Boston Bruins fan fight
My condolences to English football fans. I'm not a football fan, but I know how much it means to them. On par to what hockey means to Canada I'm sure. ( I refuse to call it ice hockey) My Great Grandfather was born in London, England. In the district of Poplar. From what I can gather, it was a pretty rough area back then. He fought in the first World War, but he was a Canadian by that point.
My condolences to English football fans. I'm not a football fan, but I know how much it means to them. On par to what hockey means to Canada I'm sure. ( I refuse to call it ice hockey) My Great Grandfather was born in London, England. In the district of Poplar. From what I can gather, it was a pretty rough area back then. He fought in the first World War, but he was a Canadian by that point.
Your great grandfather did well to get out of Poplar back then! It's a bit better now. Very expensive place to live.
My condolences to English football fans. I'm not a football fan, but I know how much it means to them. On par to what hockey means to Canada I'm sure. ( I refuse to call it ice hockey) My Great Grandfather was born in London, England. In the district of Poplar. From what I can gather, it was a pretty rough area back then. He fought in the first World War, but he was a Canadian by that point.
Your great grandfather did well to get out of Poplar back then! It's a bit better now. Very expensive place to live.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poplar,_London
I was curious one day, what football club would be closest to my roots. Would it be West Ham United F.C. ?
Dis is accurate. I see those players falling down faking injury. They look around for the ref to foul the opponent and when there is none, they stand up and I am okay now, it was nada. BS! 1 minute ago you were rolling on the ground with painful face and screaming like your leg is broken in 10 parts. Players who do that should get a yellow card each time and the rules should be the same, 2 yellow cards = ejection.
Dis is accurate. I see those players falling down faking injury. They look around for the ref to foul the opponent and when there is none, they stand up and I am okay now, it was nada. BS! 1 minute ago you were rolling on the ground with painful face and screaming like your leg is broken in 10 parts. Players who do that should get a yellow card each time and the rules should be the same, 2 yellow cards = ejection.
Some leagues have started giving yellows for simulation.
Considering that they came in second in the last world cup 4 years ago I wouldn't see Croatia complete underdogs. But it's one of those "golden generation" kinda teams around Luca Modric, with that generation getting kinda old. But to some extend that could aslo be said of Argentina, with the likes of Di Maria and Messi. But then Messi gets the ball and they become favorites, at least for that match
For the tournament, with the limited amount I have seen of the various matches, I'd consider France showed the most convincing performance overall.
Maybe but I wouldn't bet on it. There have been a couple of games this tournament where a team came back and won from a 2 goal deficit but it's definitely not a common thing.
Clinical win yesterday for Argentina, with a Messi masterclass for good measure. A World Cup win for him is what I want to see. No career deserves it more, and I hope when he hangs up his boots he can count the 2022 WC among his trophies. He's carried them this far, and whether they can't get over that final hurdle remains to be seen. Argentina has failed to deliver throughout Messi's career, but that Copa win maybe was the thing that convinced them they could do it. France or Morocco will have something to say about it.
That was a thumping penalty Messi hit yesterday too.
France wins 2.0 and go on to play Argentina on Sunday in the Final. France is the first team to appear in successive World Cup final. Soccer fans are fully dedicated. The Morocco fans were crying. I seen 1000 American NFL and College football and can't remember seeing crying fans even when their team is losing in the Super Bowl or Rose Bowl.
Respect fot Morocco, very good performance in which they showed that they were not just lucky but deserved to play that semi-final. Might have been, that the early French goal forced them right away on a more offensive stance than likely planned, but they perfomed well in that role.
Best team won. Though France were totally brilliant also. Penalties are not the best way to decide the winner, though Argentina would of won in any case I believe.
Well done Argentina.
Commiserations to France, you will come back I'm sure.
I have waited soooo long for an Argentina World Cup win with Messi. I've had so many heatrbreaks over those years, especially the Argentina V Germany match in 2014. Seeing Messi's penalty kick soar over the post and essentially lose the World Cup was heartbreaking, then there was Copa America, then his retirement from international play in 2016, then with his return, getting knocked out of the 2018 World Cup. Things seemed to pick up with a Copa America win, but then there was the trade to PSG. WOrld Cup came again, and there was that shicking loss to Saudi Arabia. But they kept going until today.
And along with my past heartbreaks, there was my heart skipping beats and stopping several times this morning with my blood pressure being taxed! COuld the match have gotten any nail biter? At 2-0 I was like, they might actually do it this time! But I didn't want to believe it lest I set myself up for disappointment. I just wanted them to keep going and to not give anything away.
France's 1st goal, and then the 2nd right after it was a heartbreaker and knocked the wind out of me. Hats off to Mbappe on those. But when it went to extended time, and so many goal attempts almost avoiding that, I was really getting anxious. The 3rd goal by Messi should have been it, but France played on and again hats off to Mbappe, in both ways, with that hat trick! BUt that again for me to the point of shivering (although it is cold here in Chicago).
When it went to penalties, now I felt like I was on the precipice. Pucker factor way up, even after their leading goals and France's misses. Anything could have still happened, but it was so hard and so close that when Argentina finally got the winning penalty kick, I think the team was shocked as much as I was. No one ran out to the goal in a mad frenzy of celebration--I think they were just dumbfounded, and so was I. I was like, "Did he make it? Did we win?" and then when his shirt came off it dawned on me and I managed a yelp and a jump but still being in overly-cautious-don't-jinkx=it mode, I was undure if I could continue. I think the rest of the team was the same way.
When I saw his shirt come off, one of the men who had the best view to see if they had won or not, I then know it was for real.
I still can't believe it, and I was shaking from joy. What a fine way for Messi to end his career, which to me is bittersweet, but I am so happy for him and for ARgentina, he and they really earned it.
Mbappe: I feel really bad for him, I do, and he did play VERY well. But Mbappe, you are young and have a whole career ahead of you and I am certain that Messi's torchwillbe passed to you and you will be one of the best if not the greatest player of your time and I look forward to seeing your career develop!
Well played, France, you did fight hard and well.
But congratulations Argentina, I'm so happy and so happy for you, especially Messi!
It would be nice if the game could be decided in extra time. /maybe take 2 players from each team to open up the field. Was a great game, congrats ARG.
Got to admit it was a great game! While I wasn’t a big fan of Argentina, I was even less if a fan of France, was sitting on the pier in Southern CA eating my breakfast and drinking my first Irish coffee of the day and watching the game on a huge TV. It was as much fun watching the people in all colors and all states of dress. While I hate the politics, this is a fun place to spend the winter. By the way it was freakin cold at home today.
Don't blame, I don't know any US football player but Tom Brady (not even sure of spelling) 🤣, had he not been still famous this or last year, wouldn't even have heard of him.
Yes Pelé was nicknamed "the king" for a reason, and Brasil refers him more than any player since I think.