Lynyrd Skynyrd will still be touring 300 years from now, replacing players as needed. The Rolling Stones lost their long-time bassist Bill Wyman to retirement (1962 – 1993) yet they continued touring but did anyone care? Classic rock acts like Journey, Styx and Foreigner continue touring with some (or in Foreigner's case, just one) "original" key members but without their most popular front men. This could be said even of Pink Floyd in '94, the one time I saw them was without Roger Waters.
I think at some concerts the fans are celebrating the music rather than throwing accolades to the band members, who may or may not have had anything to do with creating the song they're playing. And the average concert goer may not know or even care who is actually on stage performing their old-time favorites.
Hardcore Rush fans are kinda picky about that sorta thing. We know that when Rush opened the
R30 show with the beginning of
Finding My Way, and anytime they play
Working Man that our applause is going to Geddy, Alex and John (RIP). But we also appreciate Neil for playing these songs live.
We never felt Rush ever needed a new lead singer because we never thought much about Rush having the typical front man. 3 men on stage of equal importance, facing stage from left to right...Alex, Neil, Geddy, that's the only way it can be. We assume Geddy was chosen as the best singer of the trio (even before Neil), although many songs don't include vocals. I personally never had a problem with Geddy's singing but then I was also listening to Led Zeppelin and old Black Sabbath at the time. When I heard Geddy "screaming" in the harder parts of
The Necromancer I thought to myself, "Kinda sounds like Sabbath."
Where Neil, Geddy and Alex personally rank among rock musicians (as if anyone could be a judge of this, other then a popularity contest), really doesn't matter, it's what they do together on stage that matters, IMO. But I can hear them slowing down in their playing as they enter their 60's, their songs are sounding more like the studio versions than how they played live many years ago (i.e. see the
Exit Stage Left video in my first post of this thread). I believe their overabundance of stage energy is fading, but studio sounding Rush is still worth buying a ticket for.
Neil writes in his books about retiring from touring and I get the feeling it's coming sooner rather than later. And if you ever wonder just what it takes to put on a Rush show...
Backstage Secrets: On The Road With The Rock Band Rush (2008)
http://www.amazon.com/Backstage-Secrets-...ckstage+secretsThis program certainly helps explain the ~$100.00 ticket price.
I think they're pushing really hard now, possibly taking a small break before a 40th Anniversary tour. They just released and toured a solid concept album in
Clockwork Angels (w/300p novel) and were finally inducted into the RRHoF. It just seems a perfect way to me to end it on that note.
If they play too far past their prime they're going to have to play
Losing It from
Signals on their final tour (Rush fans will get it).