Damn... Love to see these old bids flying but they seem to all eventually end that way Afterall, they were never meant to clock so many flying hours. At least the crew walked away from this one.
A buddy of mine works on the other side of the airport where my base is and is supposed to be getting a B-17 in for avionics upgrades in a week or two. Hope this wasn't that one.
Terrible news. The Liberty Belle is the B-17 I took a ride in several years ago. What a loss of a great aircraft.
That was the first thing I thought when I saw the thread. Terrible. I had hoped that it would some day come up here and I could go for a ride as well. So sad to see these old birds go. I am happy that everybody survived.
There are a total of 53 surviving airframes worldwide:
12 active flying **I guess 1 less now ** 9 on static display 2 currently undergoing restoration to fly 3 currently undergoing restoration for display 5 in storage 19 partial airframes/hulks
Frankly, It's pretty weird seeing as the airplanes I fly are based at the Sugar Grove airport. I took a few friends up in a 182RG yesterday and we all stopped to look at it for about 30 minutes. Next day it's gone. The crew are supposedly on their way back here right now, and people have been talking to the chase plane pilot.
Assuming Wiki is to be believed,she was grounded the week before for mechanical problems.
And yes, when I was out at the airport yesterday, it was still grounded due to a crack in the fuel tank. They sealed it and that was that.
Waiting on the B17 crew to get here, but for someone reason everyone has left but they left their mechanics trailer here. So I'm assuming they're coming back. I'll keep you guys updated
Assuming Wiki is to be believed,she was grounded the week before for mechanical problems.
And yes, when I was out at the airport yesterday, it was still grounded due to a crack in the fuel tank. They sealed it and that was that.
As an A&P aircraft mechanic myself, an onboard fire and a recently sealed cracked fuel tank issue might add up. If you don't mix the B-1/2 sealant well enough it won't set up and cure right. I don't know the facts yet, just my own observation.
BTW, received word from my buddy who was supposed to install the avionics upgrade to a B-17 and this is the aircraft that was supposed to be here in Ft Wayne. They were going to have an open house at the avionics company he's working for in a couple weeks and use that as a static display.
I feel for the person who did the tank repair. If the fire was caused by an improperly sealed fuel tank the person who did the repair is going to feel like dirt.
And even brighter side she wasn't scrapped at the end of the WWII like most others. She had a good life and everyone made it out but it's still a tragic end to such an amazing aircraft. My Grandfather served on B-17s so this hits home.
On the positive side, she didn't go out rusting away in a field covered in foliage with animals nesting inside.
Heh, yea I guess they'd all go, one way or another outside of a museum (which is still no guarantee).
As I heard an R/C pilot say about his hundreds of hours and dollars invested in a beautiful model that was reduced to wrinkled paper and balsa chips in an instant... If you don't want to crash them, don't fly them.
Quite sad watching that film of the burning wreck. Really scary if it was a cockpit fire, or a fuel tank fire, I'm so very glad they all were able to get on the ground and escape.
Well, it's been a hell of a day to say the least. There are definitely days where you think you should have just gone back to bed. I can't comment on details really (don't know much more than what's in the news postings anyway) - but I talked with Ray briefly and apparently he had just left the airport by a few minutes in the Liberty Foundation's P-40 on their way to their next stop in Indiana. He turned around when the incident occurred and has been dealing with this all day - he's in emergency mode right now, so I just more or less expressed my sympathy and let him get back to it.
The death of this fine lady comes as a shock and I feel sad for the loss but I feel a bit philosophical at the same time. I feel that it would have been a bigger tragedy to keep this warbird locked up in a museum. She had a devoted family of mechanics, pilots, crew, and volunteers to keep her airworthy and a plane like that needs to spread her wings.
I was only ever a volunteer, but I will cherish the time I was able to spend showing people the aircraft and the flights I had for the rest of my life.
Rest in peace Liberty Belle, thank you for getting your final crew on the ground safe.
Like so many of her sisters who made it back, but never flew again, she brought her crew home. What better can you say about an airplane? I hope someone, somewhere, is restoring another one.
They'll retrieve a data plate and the tailwheel and somehow rebuild everything around around those two parts... we'll see Liberty Belle flying again in no time!
They'll retrieve a data plate and the tailwheel and somehow rebuild everything around around those two parts... we'll see Liberty Belle flying again in no time!
Odd, looks like no propellers were moving during the crash or they would be bent. One feathered on inboard left. Wonder what happened?
Gear were down.
Yes I was going to add, the fire is what probably caused the plane to nose forward once stopped and the wings to detach from the fuselage. She probably landed well in that field!
Well, it's been a hell of a day to say the least. There are definitely days where you think you should have just gone back to bed. I can't comment on details really (don't know much more than what's in the news postings anyway) - but I talked with Ray briefly and apparently he had just left the airport by a few minutes in the Liberty Foundation's P-40 on their way to their next stop in Indiana. He turned around when the incident occurred and has been dealing with this all day - he's in emergency mode right now, so I just more or less expressed my sympathy and let him get back to it.
The death of this fine lady comes as a shock and I feel sad for the loss but I feel a bit philosophical at the same time. I feel that it would have been a bigger tragedy to keep this warbird locked up in a museum. She had a devoted family of mechanics, pilots, crew, and volunteers to keep her airworthy and a plane like that needs to spread her wings.
I was only ever a volunteer, but I will cherish the time I was able to spend showing people the aircraft and the flights I had for the rest of my life.
Rest in peace Liberty Belle, thank you for getting your final crew on the ground safe.
Nice picture! Any chanse there is a high resolution one?
If it had to happen, better with a trained crew only on board than carrying civilians enjoying a Fathers Day treat. Could of been a much worse tragedy. I presume looking at the pix that some components will be able to be salvaged anfd may give life to another vintage bird hopefully. Very sad.
From what I can tell, the landing was simply a 'forced landing'. The damage to the airframe was caused by the fire, not the landing itself. This would explain why the props weren't bent.
The pilot deserves a medal under the circumstances! The facts speak for themselves... Perfect three point on a wing and a prayer! And there maybe life in those engines, yet!
The death of this fine lady comes as a shock and I feel sad for the loss but I feel a bit philosophical at the same time. I feel that it would have been a bigger tragedy to keep this warbird locked up in a museum.
I feel totally opposite from you, but I guess why opinions are like @ssholes, everybody's got one...
Too bad she couldn't have been preserved for future generations, and maybe they could have used her for a painstaking perfect rebuild some day. Anyway, it is not that sad regarding B-17s, because a lot of those are still flying. But the unique remaining types that some people keep flying... Well, that is just a disaster when they go down.
It sounds to me like there was minimal damage from the landing, and the firetrucks could have put the fire out but didn't want to get stuck on the wet field, so they didn't go in.
this is why they shouldn't fly these planes except for special occasions because the odds of them crashing is too high they got their crew though the war and should be left in peace to rest, but on the upside at least the crew got clear.
It sounds to me like there was minimal damage from the landing, and the firetrucks could have put the fire out but didn't want to get stuck on the wet field, so they didn't go in.
That's wrong. I can understand for a typical plane, but for a historical plane like that, do whatever you can to attempt to save it.
this is why they shouldn't fly these planes except for special occasions because the odds of them crashing is too high they got their crew though the war and should be left in peace to rest, but on the upside at least the crew got clear.
Liberty Bell was in a museum and was damaged in a Tornado before they restored her. So "Safe" in a museum is not necessarily correct.
This B-17 was on static display at the New England Air Museum in Windsor Lock, Connecticut, for many years. The NEAM was hit by a tornado in 1979. This B-17 was seriously damaged in that storm. The B-17 was later sold to Tom Reilly. Reilly runs the Warbird Restoration School in Florida. The B-17 was slowly being restored. Reilly hoped to display the completed B-17 as the Outhouse Mouse.
I shudder to think what might happen at Planes of Fame, Yanks Air museum, Palm Springs Air museum, or the March Air museum, or any air museum in California during a really big earthquake. The loss of historic aircraft safely tucked away in a museum could be immense.
It sounds to me like there was minimal damage from the landing, and the firetrucks could have put the fire out but didn't want to get stuck on the wet field, so they didn't go in.
Reading that made me boil. The fire department exists to take risks in order to save life and property. What is the cost of a pulling a stuck fire truck out of the mud compared to the value of an aircraft, especially one like "Liberty Belle"?
while it is true they CAN be damaged in a place like a museum, a museum that is properly protect the odds of a plane destoryed beyond repair are slimer then when it crashes.
while it is true they CAN be damaged in a place like a museum, a museum that is properly protect the odds of a plane destoryed beyond repair are slimer then when it crashes.
So long as there are more than a handful of examples still in existence the B17's, and other warbirds, should keep flying. That is what they were intended to do, not sit and collect dust. There are already several B17's on permanent static display, the flying ones don't endanger those at all.
I seen a 'Lanc and then was able to touch it. It was beautiful. I thought I was pretty lucky. Later, it flew low over me. The previous sensations did not compare.
while it is true they CAN be damaged in a place like a museum, a museum that is properly protect the odds of a plane destoryed beyond repair are slimer then when it crashes.
That is an misconception on your part about the effectiveness of the museums. Due to their size several museums are storing their B-17's outside and they are cared for less often than Liberty Belle or any of the other flyable B-17's. Birds and the weather are taking their toll on them and every aircraft stored outdoors every day. Most museums just don't have the money to build hangars big enough to house them or the personnel to dedicate to maintenance on a daily basis.
This site will give you a decent overview of the static B-17's on display and how they are displayed. http://www.johnweeks.com/b17static/index.html When time, weather, and the birds destroy these examples all that will be left of them is the pictures too. IMO, How fast that happens will be dependent on our support of the museums and the condition of the airframes after 70 years of being stored outdoors in the elements. It was amazing to me when I was shown by the aircraft restorers at Planes of Fame how an aircraft can look perfectly sound but the amount of deterioration that is unseen is huge.
I am not making a statement against the museums either. The museum's I have visited are staffed by extremely dedicated yet overworked volunteers who want to do more but can't due to money constraints. If it were up to them all of their planes would be maintained daily and have appropriate shelter from the elements.
Also, IMO without the flyable legacy aircraft to keep generating new interest in the warbirds the museums will wither and die on the vine causing all of their collections to end up being scrapped.
A crash like this can certainly bring up concerns, but kind of echoing other posts, seeing an airplane in a museum doesn't really give anyone the complete historical picture of what they were like. Sure you can see them there, but you don't hear the engines, you don't feel what it was like when they flew overhead, so having them only in museums is a bit of a disservice to history, to me.
I've been lucky enough to actually fly on a B-24, which my father worked on and flew a few non-combat missions on back in WWII, so being able to fly on one really made me feel more connected to his youth, and I'm so glad I was able to have that experience.
And again echoing Wheels, those types of activities generate interest for many, helping to keep them supported and maybe even interest someone a bit more in history.
As a pilot of and tinkerer with several vintage planes, including several Tiger Moths and Europe's only flying Fairchild PT-19 Cornell, I can't understand those who say vintage planes are better off in museums. There is simply no comparison between touching one in a museum and the sensation of seeing and hearing one fly before you.
S! to the Liberty Belle. She brought her crew safely down, like so many other B-17s before her.
Just a nitpicking observation about the title of the link to this thread on the SIMHQ home page, and some posts in it, the aircraft did not crash. It made an emergency landing. Only after landing was the aircraft destroyed due to their not being able to put out the fire.
Just a nitpicking observation about the title of the link to this thread on the SIMHQ home page, and some posts in it, the aircraft did not crash. It made an emergency landing. Only after landing was the aircraft destroyed due to their not being able to put out the fire.
Not able? Correction not trying to put out the fire.
Just a nitpicking observation about the title of the link to this thread on the SIMHQ home page, and some posts in it, the aircraft did not crash. It made an emergency landing. Only after landing was the aircraft destroyed due to their not being able to put out the fire.
Well, when I posted this it had just been reported on the news and there were no facts.