I have been running an Intel 10700K, 64GB DDR4, RTX3090 setup for a couple years now. While I have a Reverb G2, I prefer to fly triple screen as I have a lot of hardware and just enjoy not having that mask on plus the larger peripheral view I get. I'll use the VR more in IL2.
I bounce between triple 4K and Triple 1440. While 4K was kind of flyable in SP with the 10700K / 3090 it wasn't the best FPS, mostly high 20's - low 30's.
I decided to bite the bullet and upgrade again. Now I'm running an AMD 7800X3D on an Asrock B650 board with 64GB of DDR5.
I ran some tests using the F/A-18 and the Apache in various maps (Syria, Marianas and Caucasus). The tests were run using the 7800X3D and using both the 3090 and the 4090. All were run at 7860 x 1440.
I may try to run some in triple 4K as well as in the Reverb G2 soon in case I sell off the other 3090 I have if it would be useful for anyone. I have the in game FPS counter up on the center monitor. It may be a little hard to read on a mobile devicee, but I talk through the numbers I am seeing.
TLDR: 4090 upgrade well worth it, going from 10700K to 7800X3D also a nice jump.
Inline advert (2nd and 3rd post)
#4627632 - 05/29/2303:28 PMRe: 7800X3D RTX3090 vs RTX4090 @ 7680 x 1440 (Triple 70's)
[Re: jskibo]
Wow! Great video and technical demonstration. Thanks for posting.
"There is nothing wrong with laziness. The old saying 'The early bird gets the worm', just goes to show you the worm should have stayed in bed. So, when I volunteered for WW II, I signed up to be a fighter pilot because it was a sittin' down job." -- Robert Heinlein
