#4493185 - 10/16/19 04:55 PM
Re: The US Navy just confirmed these UFO videos are the Real Deal
[Re: Haggart]
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,569
Mr_Blastman
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,569
Atlanta, GA
|
Something is up in the military... https://www.extremetech.com/extreme...-compact-fusion-reactor-but-will-it-workTwo items worth mentioning in the article: 1) Fusion reactor 2) A friction removing device using an "energy vacuum." Of note, this device requires a "room temperature superconductor." Both were patents filed by the U.S. Navy and supported by superiors within the organisation. Granted, I know both of the above are impossible with our current level of technology. We've never achieved net-neutral fusion, and to obtain net-positive fusion with ignition is quite far-fetched. We still rely on tokomak designs which, to date, have never succeeded. So what do we do? Keep making tokomaks. If the previous ones didn't work, a bigger one most certainly will! But that's just what ITER is trying to do. And now, someone in the Navy, has filed a patent going far beyond what ITER could ever dream of... Huge dose of skepticism here. And the friction device... Well that was patented, yet requires technology that does not exist. Makes me wonder, ever so slightly. Perhaps... maybe?
Last edited by Mr_Blastman; 10/16/19 04:57 PM.
|
|
#4494565 - 10/25/19 04:49 PM
Re: The US Navy just confirmed these UFO videos are the Real Deal
[Re: Haggart]
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 707
Docjonel
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 707
|
Clearer USS Nimitz UFO Footage Showed It Had Legs Below Tic Tac bodyNot the most reliable source of course, but if the quotes are accurate, this is interesting information on the Tic Tac UFO incident. Cue theremin music and read on: But Jason [Turner, Petty Officer on the USS Princeton] has now said there is an even clearer video out there which shows the craft in a whole new light.
“What the video you see now is just a small snippet,” he told Dave Beaty of The Nimitz Encounters.
“You’re seeing small turns left and right but this thing is so much more than what you see in this video.
“The quality was very clear [in the other video].
“It was always really clear but what you see now is fuzzy and grainy, hardly identifiable.
“The shape of it [was odd] as it had some protruding objects at the bottom of it.
“I couldn’t tell if they were curled back or straight down because I was a good five or 10 feet from the feed.
“But there were definitely legs on it. It was oblong, like a tic-tac.”
"For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?" -- Mark 8:36
|
|
#4504351 - 01/20/20 07:44 PM
Re: The US Navy just confirmed these UFO videos are the Real Deal
[Re: Haggart]
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,619
CyBerkut
Administrator
|
Administrator
Hotshot
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,619
Florida
|
|
|
#4504479 - 01/21/20 08:11 PM
Re: The US Navy just confirmed these UFO videos are the Real Deal
[Re: PanzerMeyer]
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,619
CyBerkut
Administrator
|
Administrator
Hotshot
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,619
Florida
|
Yawn.
Someone wake me when little green men actually land on Earth. Until then, all of these fluff articles are annoying but also absurdly entertaining. Oh now, PM... open your mind up. Maybe they won't be green! There's another theory: Are the aliens us? UFOs may be piloted by time-traveling humans, book argues Yeah, yeah, I know... The Vulcan Science Directorate says that time travel isn't possible. Maybe they aren't as smart as they logically conclude they are! <snicker> In an odd sort of way, the time traveler thesis seems slightly more sensible than the aliens thesis. We know we are here, and technology continues to advance. We (well, some of us) humans are curious about our ancestors... it seems reasonable that our descendants will be too. If they were to eventually figure out time travel, I can see them avoiding contact in an effort to avoid contaminating the time line. I can't explain the claimed abductions and (ahem) probing though... Maybe proctology advances (or not) at a very different rate.
|
|
|
|