#4494342 - 10/24/19 09:57 AM
Re: OT: Treatment of NCO Pilots?
[Re: DukeIronHand]
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 740
Ace_Pilto
Livestreamer/YouTuber
|
Livestreamer/YouTuber
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 740
Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
|
I'm surprised it got recorded like this at all. Generally conversations like this wouldn't be disclosed so explicitly by veterans, since it's considered bad form to make remarks about fellow service members that might be construed as derogatory.
Let's pretend I got the BWOC badge to embed here.
Wenn ihr sieg im deine Kampf selbst gegen, wirst stark wie Stahl sein. "The best techniques are passed on by the survivors." - Gaiden Shinji
|
|
|
#4494397 - 10/24/19 05:49 PM
Re: OT: Treatment of NCO Pilots?
[Re: DukeIronHand]
|
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 161
mvp7
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 161
|
This McCudden-Mannoc case is pretty interesting. There are couple things I think are worth considering. Career officers have received full officer training while officers promoted from ranks during wartime often have not. Even if one is great pilot and good tactician that doesn't automatically make him the best leader for a unit. As romantic as it is to think that every officer promoted from the ranks was an incredible leader fighting the man, that's not necessarily the case. More than anything the wartime promotions are a temporary measure to replace the losses of officer cadre with at least somewhat capable people. The opinion of superiors, peers and subordinates of any soldier/person can be very different. McCudden was loved by the generals because of his achievements alone but that does not mean his peers and subordinates shared the feeling. Whether that's due to simple envy or other things is another question. Around the time I'd think the 85 squadron's leader was discussed, McCudden had apparently just been sent back to England due to combat fatigue. Here's a quite from Wikipedia: By this stage McCudden was suffering from combat fatigue. It manifested itself in his decisions, of late, to seek a victory at any price, which was alien to his normal, calculated approach to combat. Knowing he was to soon be sent home, he was obsessed with catching up to von Richthofen's score... McCudden was soon rotated home on 5 March. More than 50 officers gathered for a formal farewell dinner and they presented him with a silver model of his S.E.5A on 4 March. McCudden would not see action again.
Reading that, Grider's impression of the man doesn't seem too inaccurate. Even if he had been a careful tactician in the past, the people close to him would remember him as he was when they parted. In the end, it's the current capability of the man that really matters on the front, not past glories and contributions. Overall, Mannock simply seems better leader option at the time than McCudden. There's also the possibility that McCudden was suggested for the post in the first place because of his good relations with the generals, the whole thing kinda turns upside down .
|
|
|
#4494408 - 10/24/19 07:22 PM
Re: OT: Treatment of NCO Pilots?
[Re: mvp7]
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,532
DukeIronHand
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,532
High over the Front
|
Guess the only thing left for me is why the General stopped by. Don’t recall a Squadron ever being consulted as to who they want for a CO. Circumstances following the strange tenure of Bishop or was McCudden really chosen first which led to grumbling at 85? Who knows? A hero being held down by jealousy and class struggle is definitely more dramatic 21st century narrative than a more qualified commander being picked over a propaganda star obsessed with his personal score. The truth is probably somewhere in between the two extremes.
That’s a leap. And hardly so dramatic. And the Engineering Corp (which may not be what you think it is for “Officer Training”) was not Manocks first stop. He left both with short stays before ending up in the RFC. And since this is apparently turning into a “Mannock vs McCudden” debate McCudden has much more military experience. But we are wide of the point of the thread at this stage. I have an answer for the 85 thing for now (and more questions) so we’ll let it lay.
|
|
|
#4494411 - 10/24/19 08:10 PM
Re: OT: Treatment of NCO Pilots?
[Re: DukeIronHand]
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,105
Raine
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,105
New Brunswick, Canada
|
To answer Duke's question, I found the quote from Mac Grider in "The Making of Billy Bishop" by Brereton Greenhous. On further examination, Greenhous clearly took it word for word from "Warbirds – The Diary of an Unknown Aviator" by Elliott White Springs. Springs published Mac Grider's diary under that title.
Interestingly, in "The Courage of the Early Morning" by William Arthur Bishop, Billy's son, I found the following passage:
"A rumour circulated through the squadron that McCudden was being considered as Bishop's successor – and McCudden had a reputation for being not only an exceptional pilot, but very discipline-minded and 'regimental.' The Flying Foxes were an easy-going crew, and they feared there would be friction. Bishop's own choice was the slender Irishman he had met with Grid Caldwell – Mick Mannock of 74 Squadron. He was a superb aerial tactician who would probably be popular with the Foxes – and all hands were delighted when Bishop's recommendation was accepted by headquarters."
So here we have Bishop's son, claiming that it was Bishop's own suggestion that Mannock be his successor. Bishop had indeed expressed admiration for Mannock. He wrote his fiancée, Margaret Burdon, "Mannock now has more than 30 Huns. He is a marvel from all accounts. I'm always glad when a man like Mannock does so well. He is such a good fellow, and everyone likes him so much."I believe Bishop saw McCudden as a closer rival than Mannock. Mannock was less likely to challenge Bishop's record (Bishop inflated his claims, McCudden reported his claims accurately, and Mannock deflated his claims). Strangely, Bishop attributes his preference to McCudden's attention to discipline (as opposed to Grider's suggestion that McCudden was too focused on his own score). Yet Mannock could be equally harsh with a pilot who did not follow instructions.
I have an evil hunch that Bishop was a classic narcissist and, as narcissists are prone to do, projected his own weakness (i.e. focus on personal score over leadership) onto McCudden when speaking with his men at 85. There is a lot at play here, and much more than any simple notion of class distinction.
|
|
|
#4494414 - 10/24/19 08:12 PM
Re: OT: Treatment of NCO Pilots?
[Re: Raine]
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,532
DukeIronHand
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,532
High over the Front
|
To answer Duke's question, I found the quote from Mac Grider in "The Making of Billy Bishop" by Brereton Greenhous. On further examination, Greenhous clearly took it word for word from "Warbirds – The Diary of an Unknown Aviator" by Elliott White Springs. Springs published Mac Grider's diary under that title.
Interestingly, in "The Courage of the Early Morning" by William Arthur Bishop, Billy's son, I found the following passage:
"A rumour circulated through the squadron that McCudden was being considered as Bishop's successor – and McCudden had a reputation for being not only an exceptional pilot, but very discipline-minded and 'regimental.' The Flying Foxes were an easy-going crew, and they feared there would be friction. Bishop's own choice was the slender Irishman he had met with Grid Caldwell – Mick Mannock of 74 Squadron. He was a superb aerial tactician who would probably be popular with the Foxes – and all hands were delighted when Bishop's recommendation was accepted by headquarters."
So here we have Bishop's son, claiming that it was Bishop's own suggestion that Mannock be his successor. Bishop had indeed expressed admiration for Mannock. He wrote his fiancée, Margaret Burdon, "Mannock now has more than 30 Huns. He is a marvel from all accounts. I'm always glad when a man like Mannock does so well. He is such a good fellow, and everyone likes him so much."I believe Bishop saw McCudden as a closer rival than Mannock. Mannock was less likely to challenge Bishop's record (Bishop inflated his claims, McCudden reported his claims accurately, and Mannock deflated his claims). Strangely, Bishop attributes his preference to McCudden's attention to discipline (as opposed to Grider's suggestion that McCudden was too focused on his own score). Yet Mannock could be equally harsh with a pilot who did not follow instructions.
I have an evil hunch that Bishop was a classic narcissist and, as narcissist are prone to do, projected his own weakness (i.e. focus on personal score over leadership) onto McCudden when speaking with his men at 85. There is a lot at play here, and much more than any simple notion of class distinction. Excellent! Thank you. Clearly I need more additions to the library. Thanks for taking the time to post that. EDIT: Actually I have about 150 WW1 aviation books in electronic format that I just remembered. Oops. That title sounds familiar. Wonder if that’s one of them. Got them saved for when I buy a Kindle - which I haven’t got around to in about 6 years.
Last edited by DukeIronHand; 10/24/19 08:20 PM.
|
|
|
#4494426 - 10/24/19 09:26 PM
Re: OT: Treatment of NCO Pilots?
[Re: DukeIronHand]
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,532
DukeIronHand
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,532
High over the Front
|
All good. I do, unfortunately, a lot of editing due to typing with big he-man thumbs and only being able to see a couple lines at a time then ofttimes forgetting where I was going with the thought. And Autocorrect, despite its title, is not my friend. Aaaand. Edited for grammar!
Last edited by DukeIronHand; 10/24/19 09:54 PM.
|
|
|
#4494439 - 10/24/19 11:46 PM
Re: OT: Treatment of NCO Pilots?
[Re: DukeIronHand]
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 740
Ace_Pilto
Livestreamer/YouTuber
|
Livestreamer/YouTuber
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 740
Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
|
Even further off topic I found myself in a squadron entirely populated by SGT's when I turned off "Historical Aces". There was only one LT in the whole outfit. Must have been lonely in the officer's mess and quite surprising for 1916. Turning HA's back on distributed the ranks more credibly. The French and German services seem to have been more or less indifferent to putting NCO's in the cockpit. The German approach was amusing since they originally had the officer as the observer under the presumption that he would "captain" the aircraft and the NCO would be responsible for the lowly mechanical task of actually driving it. This system always reminds me of that old movie "Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines". I can't imagine that their social protocols were wildly different from the British system since class segregation was certainly present there. I imagine that the Republican French were more egalitarian.
Let's pretend I got the BWOC badge to embed here.
Wenn ihr sieg im deine Kampf selbst gegen, wirst stark wie Stahl sein. "The best techniques are passed on by the survivors." - Gaiden Shinji
|
|
|
#4494617 - 10/26/19 12:34 AM
Re: OT: Treatment of NCO Pilots?
[Re: DukeIronHand]
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,532
DukeIronHand
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,532
High over the Front
|
Little tidbit about Mannock. Stumbled across this while gadding about. The author generally claims that (with quotes from Mannock’s contemporaries) the blood thirsty persona often attached to “Mick” was an act to motivate the new flyers. Normally, with just cause, you can take anything you find on the internet with a huge grain of salt but the author here is quoting known named sources. The Jones mentioned here is the famous flyer Ira “Taffy” Jones (who reportedly hated William Bishop and started the “73” victories for Mannock - one more then Bishop) and Jim Eyles who, if you are not familiar with the Mannock story, was a family he lived with in his youth. “On May 21, Mannock brought down four German planes—three Pfalz D.IIIs and a Hannover two-seater—and the next day was awarded the Distinguished Service Order. Before the month was out, he flamed eight new victims. After such victories, he would burst into the mess shouting, “Sizzle, sizzle, sizzle, wonk woof!” to boost morale. But privately he expressed darker thoughts. By the middle of June, Jones noticed that Mannock’s nerves were “noticeably fraying. He was now continually talking about being shot down in flames.” Writing to his sister, Mannock said, “I am supposed to be going on leave, (if I live long enough)….” He was fighting depression and plagued by dreams of burning aircraft. On June 18, Mannock sailed home for leave in England. Upon his arrival he was informed that he had been promoted to major and given command of No. 85 Squadron, previously led by Canadian ace Major William A. “Billy” Bishop, and that he also had been awarded a Bar to his DSO. He reacted with indifference to the news. After spending a brief but painful time with his mother, an alcoholic, Mannock went to stay with his friend Jim Eyles, who saw that he “had changed dramatically. Gone was the old sparkle we knew so well; gone was the incessant wit. I could see him wring his hands together to conceal the shaking and twitching.” One day, as the time approached for Mannock to return to the war, “he started to tremble violently. This grew into a convulsive straining. He cried uncontrollably….His face, when he lifted it, was a terrible sight. Saliva and tears were running down his face; he couldn’t stop it.” Given his condition, 31-year-old Mannock should never have been sent back to the front. But back he went.” Poor Mick. Goes home on leave in a apparently exhausted state for a rest but has to turn around almost immediately and head back to France to take over 85 where he lasted a month. EDIT: Guess I could link the whole article eh? https://www.historynet.com/edward-mick-mannock-world-war-i-raf-ace-pilot.htm
Last edited by DukeIronHand; 10/26/19 01:11 AM.
|
|
|
|
|