Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#4414393 - 04/02/18 11:48 PM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: Dart]  
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,984
Master Offline
meh
Master  Offline
meh
Veteran

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,984
Originally Posted by Dart
Add in that if fusion power became a reality it would be greatly resisted by the "Ecology" activists, and by extension the politicians they fund.

Anything involving the word "nuclear" is simply unacceptable to them.


That is why it will be rebranded as "Safer Fusion" which is similar to nuclear fusion but its safer!

Inline advert (2nd and 3rd post)

#4414412 - 04/03/18 03:20 AM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: Master]  
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,880
F4UDash4 Online cool
Veteran
F4UDash4  Online Cool
Veteran

Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,880
SC
Originally Posted by Master
Originally Posted by Dart
Add in that if fusion power became a reality it would be greatly resisted by the "Ecology" activists, and by extension the politicians they fund.

Anything involving the word "nuclear" is simply unacceptable to them.


That is why it will be rebranded as "Safer Fusion" which is similar to nuclear fusion but its safer!



Or "Renewable Green Fusion" wink


"In the vast library of socialist books, there’s not a single volume on how to create wealth, only how to take and “redistribute” it.” - David Horowitz
#4414424 - 04/03/18 06:10 AM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: Arthonon]  
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,624
Mr_Blastman Offline
Hotshot
Mr_Blastman  Offline
Hotshot

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,624
Atlanta, GA
Holy crap, don't you guys realize that Lockheed patent was on April Fools?

Fission powered jets were a thing in the 50s and 60s but they never took off, btw. Net power output was too low for the weight, etc., until later iterations but the concept was eventually abandoned for a variety of radioactive reasons™. But fusion powered jets... come on. Fell for that here?

Last edited by Mr_Blastman; 04/03/18 06:12 AM.
#4414434 - 04/03/18 08:02 AM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: Arthonon]  
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 192
Priceyplanecrasher Offline
Member
Priceyplanecrasher  Offline
Member

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 192
Netherlands
This seems to hold more validity then some smalltalk of a company with a known criminal history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendelstein_7-X

#4414453 - 04/03/18 12:03 PM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: Mr_Blastman]  
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,880
F4UDash4 Online cool
Veteran
F4UDash4  Online Cool
Veteran

Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,880
SC
Originally Posted by Mr_Blastman
Holy crap, don't you guys realize that Lockheed patent was on April Fools?

Fission powered jets were a thing in the 50s and 60s but they never took off, btw. Net power output was too low for the weight, etc., until later iterations but the concept was eventually abandoned for a variety of radioactive reasons™. But fusion powered jets... come on. Fell for that here?


The article is dated March 26, Lockheed filed the patent on February 15.

Try reading a bit before accusing anyone of falling for something.


"In the vast library of socialist books, there’s not a single volume on how to create wealth, only how to take and “redistribute” it.” - David Horowitz
#4414473 - 04/03/18 01:46 PM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: F4UDash4]  
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,624
Mr_Blastman Offline
Hotshot
Mr_Blastman  Offline
Hotshot

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,624
Atlanta, GA
I first read the article on April 1st when it was posted on a news website I frequent, so to me, it was clear as day, and frankly, a portable fusion reactor in an aircraft? Please. We don't even have full-blown power plant fusion running yet, so how the hell are we going to get it working in a plane? I love science fiction, even write it, but this is farcical.

#4414503 - 04/03/18 03:54 PM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: Arthonon]  
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,880
F4UDash4 Online cool
Veteran
F4UDash4  Online Cool
Veteran

Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,880
SC
So Lockheed filed a patent on February 15 in order to pull an April Fools prank a month and a half later?

Yep, you certainly are a science fiction writer.


"In the vast library of socialist books, there’s not a single volume on how to create wealth, only how to take and “redistribute” it.” - David Horowitz
#4414504 - 04/03/18 04:12 PM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: Mr_Blastman]  
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,711
CyBerkut Offline
Administrator
CyBerkut  Offline
Administrator
Hotshot

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,711
Florida
Originally Posted by Mr_Blastman
I first read the article on April 1st when it was posted on a news website I frequent, so to me, it was clear as day, and frankly, a portable fusion reactor in an aircraft? Please. We don't even have full-blown power plant fusion running yet, so how the hell are we going to get it working in a plane? I love science fiction, even write it, but this is farcical.


From the article that F4 linked:

Quote
With McGuire's help, the article succinctly explained, at least in theory, how the CFR was supposed to get around these issues:

“The problem with tokamaks is that “they can only hold so much plasma, and we call that the beta limit,” McGuire says. Measured as the ratio of plasma pressure to the magnetic pressure, the beta limit of the average tokamak is low, or about “5% or so of the confining pressure,” he says. Comparing the torus to a bicycle tire, McGuire adds, ‘if they put too much in, eventually their confining tire will fail and burst—so to operate safely, they don’t go too close to that.’ …
The CFR will avoid these issues by tackling plasma confinement in a radically different way. Instead of constraining the plasma within tubular rings, a series of superconducting coils will generate a new magnetic-field geometry in which the plasma is held within the broader confines of the entire reaction chamber. Superconducting magnets within the coils will generate a magnetic field around the outer border of the chamber. ‘So for us, instead of a bike tire expanding into air, we have something more like a tube that expands into an ever-stronger wall,’ McGuire says. The system is therefore regulated by a self-tuning feedback mechanism, whereby the farther out the plasma goes, the stronger the magnetic field pushes back to contain it. The CFR is expected to have a beta limit ratio of one. ‘We should be able to go to 100% or beyond,’ he adds.”

If the system works, it’s hard to underscore just how dramatically it could change not just the future of warfare, but the basic nature of human existence. Running on approximately 25 pounds of fuel – a mixture of hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium – Lockheed Martin estimated the notional reactor would be able to run for an entire year without stopping. The device would be able to generate a constant 100 megawatts of power during that period.

According to the company website on the CFR, the reactor could be powerful enough to run an aircraft carrier, power a plane the size of a C-5 Galaxy airlifter, provide electricity to cities with anywhere from 50 to 100,000 people, and maybe even speed up a trip to Mars. In each case, the compact reactor would take the place of large conventional fuel systems or fission reactors, eliminating weight and bulk. This in turn could create trade space for additional system or carrying capacity in terms of personnel or materiel or potentially allow for a more energy efficient overall shape or design.


Potential benefits being realized by getting away from the Tokamak style containment geometry hardly strikes me as farcical. A C-5 Galaxy is a big plane with a lot of lift capacity... changing something on that scale over to a light-weight (relative to a Tokamak design) fusion reactor hardly seems inconceivable, especially if one is willing to sacrifice cargo capacity in pursuit of the project.

Technology in materials and superconductors has been advancing. Has it been far enough to enable this design? I don't know... but I wouldn't rule it out without knowing a lot more details.

#4414532 - 04/03/18 07:48 PM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: Arthonon]  
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,612
The Nephilim Offline
S3D GuRu
The Nephilim  Offline
S3D GuRu
Hotshot

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,612
3rd Stone from the Sun !!
https://www.iter.org/


it is coming better buy the stocks now wink


Intel i7 10700K @ 4.8GHZ / ASRock Z590 Phantom Gaming 4AC Motherboard / Asus 1080GTX OC / SoundBlaster Z / Windows 10 64bit / Reverb G2 VR Gear. / Thrustmaster Cougar + MFD's / Buttkicker Simulation / Thrustmaster Cougar
#4414540 - 04/03/18 09:18 PM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: Arthonon]  
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,712
Dart Offline
Measured in Llamathrusts
Dart  Offline
Measured in Llamathrusts
Lifer

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,712
Alabaster, AL USA
My eyes perked up at "super conducting magnets," as that implies super cooling them.

Heck, if they can come up with a way to make super cooling bullet proof it's worth the patent right there.


The opinions of this poster are largely based on facts and portray a possible version of the actual events.

More dumb stuff at http://www.darts-page.com

From Laser:
"The forum is the place where combat (real time) flight simulator fans come to play turn based strategy combat."
#4414557 - 04/03/18 11:25 PM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: F4UDash4]  
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,624
Mr_Blastman Offline
Hotshot
Mr_Blastman  Offline
Hotshot

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,624
Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by F4UDash4
So Lockheed filed a patent on February 15 in order to pull an April Fools prank a month and a half later?

Yep, you certainly are a science fiction writer.


A farce is a farce is a farce is a farce.

I'll believe this when I see it flying in the sky and truly operational. Nobody has achieved a net positive fusion reaction on Earth and managed to sustain it yet. Nobody. The laws of physics are laws for a reason, and there's good reason that the gravity well of a star is needed in nature to accomplish sustainable fusion. And fancy magnets and directed lasers all sap ridiculous amounts of energy to accomplish what gravity assists for practically nothing.

I stand by my original assessment and happily wait to be proven wrong, that Lockheed may manage to pull this off in the relatively near future. But... I won't hold my breath while I wait, as I expect it to be quite some time.

However, if they do achieve this purported fusion, the world will change dramatically in short order thereafter.

#4414580 - 04/04/18 02:24 AM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: Arthonon]  
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,712
Dart Offline
Measured in Llamathrusts
Dart  Offline
Measured in Llamathrusts
Lifer

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,712
Alabaster, AL USA
Hold on a tick - are they talking about cold fusion?

If they are, I retract everything I typed and substitute it with this:


Bwaahahahahahahaha...


The opinions of this poster are largely based on facts and portray a possible version of the actual events.

More dumb stuff at http://www.darts-page.com

From Laser:
"The forum is the place where combat (real time) flight simulator fans come to play turn based strategy combat."
#4414583 - 04/04/18 03:20 AM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: Dart]  
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,880
F4UDash4 Online cool
Veteran
F4UDash4  Online Cool
Veteran

Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,880
SC
Originally Posted by Dart
Hold on a tick - are they talking about cold fusion?


No


"In the vast library of socialist books, there’s not a single volume on how to create wealth, only how to take and “redistribute” it.” - David Horowitz
#4414589 - 04/04/18 04:15 AM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: Dart]  
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,711
CyBerkut Offline
Administrator
CyBerkut  Offline
Administrator
Hotshot

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,711
Florida
Originally Posted by Dart
Hold on a tick - are they talking about cold fusion?

If they are, I retract everything I typed and substitute it with this:


Bwaahahahahahahaha...


No, they are talking about fusion similar to that of a Tokamak (toroidal ring magnetic confinement of hot fusion), but with a very different confinement geometry that supposedly offers advantages over the limits inherent to the Tokamak geometry.

#4414640 - 04/04/18 02:07 PM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: Dart]  
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,935
ArgonV Offline
Hotshot
ArgonV  Offline
Hotshot

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,935
College Station, Texas, USA
Originally Posted by Dart
My eyes perked up at "super conducting magnets," as that implies super cooling them.

Heck, if they can come up with a way to make super cooling bullet proof it's worth the patent right there.


"Most things in here don't react too well to bullets"


"Go Fly A Kite!"
-Jason R.
FS-WWI Project Leader
FS-WWI Plane Pack Site

Intel i9 10900k
Gigabyte Z490 Aorus Elite AC
64GB Corsair DDR4 2933 Vengeance RGB Pro
AMD XFX 7900 XTX Merc310 Black Edition
LG UltraGear 38GN95B-B 38" monitor
Corsair HX1200 PSU
1TB EVO 980 Pro M.2 PCIe x4 SSD
2TB EVO 980 Pro M.2 PCIe x4 SSD
Two 2TB EVO 860 SSDs
Sound Blaster ZxR
Win 10 x64 Pro
HOTAS Cougar #4069 w/Uber II Nxt mod #284 & UTM bushings
#4414649 - 04/04/18 02:50 PM Re: Is Fusion Power Coming Soon? [Re: ArgonV]  
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,577
Arthonon Offline
Veteran
Arthonon  Offline
Veteran

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,577
California
Originally Posted by ArgonV
Originally Posted by Dart
My eyes perked up at "super conducting magnets," as that implies super cooling them.

Heck, if they can come up with a way to make super cooling bullet proof it's worth the patent right there.


"Most things in here don't react too well to bullets"

Hence, making the system bullet proof smile


Ken Cartwright

No single drop of rain feels it is responsible for the flood.

http://www.techflyer.net

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RacerGT 

Quick Search
Recent Articles
Support SimHQ

If you shop on Amazon use this Amazon link to support SimHQ
.
Social


Recent Topics
Headphones
by RossUK. 04/24/24 03:48 PM
Skymaster down.
by Mr_Blastman. 04/24/24 03:28 PM
The Old Breed and the Costs of War
by wormfood. 04/24/24 01:39 PM
Actors portraying British Prime Ministers
by Tarnsman. 04/24/24 01:11 AM
Roy Cross is 100 Years Old
by F4UDash4. 04/23/24 11:22 AM
Actors portraying US Presidents
by PanzerMeyer. 04/19/24 12:19 PM
Dickey Betts was 80
by Rick_Rawlings. 04/19/24 01:11 AM
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
Copyright 1997-2016, SimHQ Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0