Same with F4, 7/10 just in different areas, only my opinion.
LOL 7/10 DCS? When the second most important part, which is combat, is done so poorly that even some arcade games provide more entertainment?! If it was not for its, still bugged, flight model it would be easily a 2/10 but i'll keep that in consideration and give a 5/10, unless ED changes the name to DS and take apart the combat from its name then i could give a 7/10. No way anything beyond that because it offers poor combat for a combat simulator and no decent environment (overall world and local detailed scenery, weather, etc..) for a pure flight simulator.
That's exactly how it should be named. In the case it would definitely become a 8/10 since the flight model is not perfect as some people try to makes others believe.
Bla Bla Bla Bla Bla Bla... Plus one Random DCS screenshot
It's "curious" how you "carefully" ignored Ice's argument that the Falcon 4 IP owners have given their blessing (a.k.a. permission) to BMS to continue to develop the BMS mod for Falcon 4. It's also curious how you conveniently forget that the company that owned/developed Falcon 4 (Microprose) ceased to exist so stealing from someone who doesn't exist is at least a bit weird and even debatable, specially after this someone actually ceased to exist which was exactly what happened regarding the Falcon 4 source code. By the way, wasn't the Falcon 4 source code leaked by someone from Microprose?? Isn't this like having my own business like for example a grocery store and in the meanwhile my business went bankrupt but instead of letting the products on my store to rot, I decided to open the doors of my store an invite whoever wants to take whatever he/she wants from my store! Yes, there are still people in the world capable of this! And of course anyone who worships the kind of business that ED/DCS follows is unable to understand something like this!
And it's also curious how you have to resort to a weird and poor argument of "source code stealing" in order to compare both sims (BMS and DCS) when you should be comparing (if you want to) the actual features on both sims - Or judge the sims for what they are instead for who supposedly own it and who developed it. But this doesn't surprise me at all, since this is a typical DCS troll/fanatic type of comment/reasoning
As a flight sim player and a customer I DON'T GIVE A F**K ABOUT WHO OWNS OR DEVELOPS WHAT! All I want is to have excellent and immersive sims and in terms of modern multirole fighter aircraft combat simulators there's currently only one that fits this criteria: B-M-S! CAPICHE??
RAZBAM is a quality developer who has kept promises during the development of their excellent Mirage 2000 module. That, coupled with the fact that there is about a 100% chance that I was going to buy this module anyway, because I'm very interested in the AV-8, led me to buy it now to save 10 bucks.
Then again, I once went on E-Bay drunk and bought all of the DVD Boxed Sets of the Golden Girls because I had convinced myself that my world needs more Rue McLanahan.
RAZBAM is a quality developer who has kept promises during the development of their excellent Mirage 2000 module. n.
We think about the same mirage?At the time of release ~60% of avionics does not work,and awful cockpit texture made in a paint? lool
Yes. That Mirage.
Would you like to Dogfight on Multiplayer? I'll take a Mirage and you can choose your ride. I'll give you a demonstration in what percentage of the avionics are now effective.
I'm sure we'll both come out of the experience having learned a valuable lesson about friendship.
You only confirm that it makes sense to buy a harrier two years after release.EARLIEST.
I guess.
Early Release stuff gives me a chance to be with the module as it develops. Given the intricacies of the "Study" modules, it's a bit less like drinking from the fire hose as elements are introduced. It doesn't bother me that they are incomplete, as (at least most of the 3rd party developers) tell us up front that they aren't complete.
You only confirm that it makes sense to buy a harrier two years after release.EARLIEST.
I guess.
Early Release stuff gives me a chance to be with the module as it develops. Given the intricacies of the "Study" modules, it's a bit less like drinking from the fire hose as elements are introduced. It doesn't bother me that they are incomplete, as (at least most of the 3rd party developers) tell us up front that they aren't complete.
It's not for everybody, but it's okay with me.
the best time to buy - IMO - is five years after early access release , by which time it should have most of its bugs ironed out.
You only confirm that it makes sense to buy a harrier two years after release.EARLIEST.
I guess.
Early Release stuff gives me a chance to be with the module as it develops. Given the intricacies of the "Study" modules, it's a bit less like drinking from the fire hose as elements are introduced. It doesn't bother me that they are incomplete, as (at least most of the 3rd party developers) tell us up front that they aren't complete.
It's not for everybody, but it's okay with me.
the best time to buy - IMO - is five years after early access release , by which time it should have most of its bugs ironed out.
Purchased. Don't regret it at all and I know I will enjoy it. Money well spent in that context.
Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people. Carl Sagan