#4369139 - 07/14/17 08:09 AM
Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,496
Genbrien
Stick to the plan man!
|
Stick to the plan man!
Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,496
Quebec, Canada
|
update from Belsimtek Link After release of Tiger and Magnificent Eight at the end of 2016 almost all our effort was relayed to development of F/A-18 DCS module in cooperation with Eagle Dynamics. In this project we are handling dynamics, avionics and systems, FCS (Flight Control System) included.
In parallel we continue our work on exciting project for fans of combat helicopters - the attack helicopter Mi-24P (was a long time since we pleased our helicopter enthusiasts, and ourselves as developers, by a war machine with rotor dynamics).
Also we started development of the famous fighter-bomber F-4E.
We are planning to post updates about each project in future.
Wish you to have a great time learning available DCS World modules and hope you will like quality of the upcoming ones.
With respect, Belsimtek Team.
XBL/PSN/others: genbrien Mobo: Asus P8P67 deluxe Monitor: Samsung 23'' 1920*1080 CPU: i7 2600k@ 4.8Ghz Keyboard: Logitech G15 GPU:GTX 980 Strix Mouse: G700s PSU: Corsair TX750w Gaming Devices: Saitek X55, TrackIr5 RAM: Mushkin 2x4gb ddr2 9-9-9-24 @1600mhz Case: Cooler Master 690 SSD: Intel X25m 80gb
|
|
#4369184 - 07/14/17 03:01 PM
Re: Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
[Re: watermanpc]
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 797
leaf_on_the_wind
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 797
|
yeah, thats the thing...who knows how many years until we get something... <commandant lassard voice> Many Many Many years </commandant lassard voice>
Last edited by leaf_on_the_wind; 07/14/17 03:01 PM.
Ferengi Rule of acquisition #1 Once you have their money ... never give it back.
|
|
#4369235 - 07/14/17 06:27 PM
Re: Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
[Re: Genbrien]
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,496
Genbrien
Stick to the plan man!
|
Stick to the plan man!
Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,496
Quebec, Canada
|
would've been really cool if they made the Hind's version with the gunner's turret, instead of the fixed gun
XBL/PSN/others: genbrien Mobo: Asus P8P67 deluxe Monitor: Samsung 23'' 1920*1080 CPU: i7 2600k@ 4.8Ghz Keyboard: Logitech G15 GPU:GTX 980 Strix Mouse: G700s PSU: Corsair TX750w Gaming Devices: Saitek X55, TrackIr5 RAM: Mushkin 2x4gb ddr2 9-9-9-24 @1600mhz Case: Cooler Master 690 SSD: Intel X25m 80gb
|
|
#4369317 - 07/15/17 09:52 AM
Re: Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
[Re: Flogger23m]
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 797
leaf_on_the_wind
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 797
|
I for one am not a fan of multi seat planes because I don't want to deal with an AI. Multiplayer co-op would be nice, but I'd assume only half of people regularly play MP, and of those it would be even harder to find someone with the same modules and times as yourself. Otherwise I am very interested in an F-4. I have flown several times with some clan buddies in the Gazelle and it was great havng someone with me
Ferengi Rule of acquisition #1 Once you have their money ... never give it back.
|
|
#4369329 - 07/15/17 12:24 PM
Re: Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
[Re: Genbrien]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
Still don't understand why they'd start another project when the current one isn't even finished yet...
- Ice
|
|
#4369331 - 07/15/17 12:36 PM
Re: Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
[Re: Genbrien]
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 946
tempusmurphy
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 946
outside London
|
I thought all Belsimtek's previous modules are now "out of Beta" and fully released
Dont think of it as being vastly outnumbered ... but just having a large target selection.
The only thing more accurate than incoming fire, is incoming friendly fire
Tracers work BOTH ways...
" I have a cunning plan my lord "
|
|
#4369340 - 07/15/17 01:58 PM
Re: Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
[Re: tempusmurphy]
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 797
leaf_on_the_wind
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 797
|
I thought all Belsimtek's previous modules are now "out of Beta" and fully released depends if you count things not being modeled right and or defeciences
Ferengi Rule of acquisition #1 Once you have their money ... never give it back.
|
|
#4369346 - 07/15/17 02:26 PM
Re: Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
[Re: Genbrien]
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,977
Vitesse
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,977
Devon UK
|
I'd hope the belsimtek guys working on the Hind and Phantom aren't taking resources from the Hornet project.
That's what I'd hope, anyway.
The F4 is something I'd be properly interested in. It was operated by so many countries and I can see it having wide appeal. I'm unsure if the E model has a tailhook 'cos that would make it even more attractive.
Last edited by Vitesse; 07/15/17 02:45 PM.
|
|
#4369375 - 07/15/17 06:53 PM
Re: Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
[Re: - Ice]
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,168
Flogger23m
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,168
US
|
Still don't understand why they'd start another project when the current one isn't even finished yet... Sometimes throwing more people are a project won't make it go faster. If they already have 5-6 people working on avionics and flight models, why should the rest sit around? Or would you prefer if they were fired and rehired 6 months from now? This is common across all industries as you know, but for some reason gamers get upset when a developer starts working on a sequel, DLC or whatever alongside the main game. Or in this case the Hornet. It is just how business is done and really isn't out of the ordinary for game development.
|
|
#4369380 - 07/15/17 07:32 PM
Re: Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
[Re: - Ice]
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,599
Frederf
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,599
|
Still don't understand why they'd start another project when the current one isn't even finished yet... Yeah you do. The money comes for the "released we'll fix the bugs later" stage not the "remember when we promised to fix everything; we did" stage. I'm with the majority here. Cheers and horrays for working to introduce new aircraft modules and genuine well-wishes but forgive us for reserving our true enthusiasm until promises become reality.
|
|
#4369390 - 07/15/17 08:57 PM
Re: Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
[Re: Frederf]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
Sometimes throwing more people are a project won't make it go faster. If they already have 5-6 people working on avionics and flight models, why should the rest sit around? Or would you prefer if they were fired and rehired 6 months from now? This is common across all industries as you know, but for some reason gamers get upset when a developer starts working on a sequel, DLC or whatever alongside the main game. Or in this case the Hornet. It is just how business is done and really isn't out of the ordinary for game development. Yeah you do. The money comes for the "released we'll fix the bugs later" stage not the "remember when we promised to fix everything; we did" stage.
I'm with the majority here. Cheers and horrays for working to introduce new aircraft modules and genuine well-wishes but forgive us for reserving our true enthusiasm until promises become reality. "Finding stuff for people to do" isn't the way to do business. When the work is done, the work is done. What happens many, many years down the line when the first half of the staff have finished work on 4-5 aircraft but the second half of the staff have only finished 1-2? Do the first half just keep plodding on? Later, you'll end up with 10-11 aircraft but only 2-4 finished. Point is, you **WILL** have to fire someone at some point.... or get them to pick up new skills. The second half clearly can't keep up with the first half, so the skills distribution in relation to manpower is out of whack. Just because it is not out of the ordinary does not mean it's the correct way to do it.
- Ice
|
|
#4369411 - 07/15/17 11:44 PM
Re: Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
[Re: - Ice]
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,168
Flogger23m
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,168
US
|
Sometimes throwing more people are a project won't make it go faster. If they already have 5-6 people working on avionics and flight models, why should the rest sit around? Or would you prefer if they were fired and rehired 6 months from now? This is common across all industries as you know, but for some reason gamers get upset when a developer starts working on a sequel, DLC or whatever alongside the main game. Or in this case the Hornet. It is just how business is done and really isn't out of the ordinary for game development. Yeah you do. The money comes for the "released we'll fix the bugs later" stage not the "remember when we promised to fix everything; we did" stage.
I'm with the majority here. Cheers and horrays for working to introduce new aircraft modules and genuine well-wishes but forgive us for reserving our true enthusiasm until promises become reality. "Finding stuff for people to do" isn't the way to do business. When the work is done, the work is done. What happens many, many years down the line when the first half of the staff have finished work on 4-5 aircraft but the second half of the staff have only finished 1-2? Do the first half just keep plodding on? Later, you'll end up with 10-11 aircraft but only 2-4 finished. Point is, you **WILL** have to fire someone at some point.... or get them to pick up new skills. The second half clearly can't keep up with the first half, so the skills distribution in relation to manpower is out of whack. Just because it is not out of the ordinary does not mean it's the correct way to do it. For all the hate the industry thinks, I think they know what they're doing. It makes sense from a business standpoint to continue growing. Your stance is more or less this: Ubisoft is working on Far Cry 4. Therefore, they should can Assassin's Creed Origins, their racing games, mobile games, Watch Dogs and whatever else they are working on. Fire a few thousand workers. That is what you're claiming, but on a smaller scale, for BST/ED. The F-4E/Mi-24 more that likely have zero effect on the progress of the F-18. If anything it can be a good thing, because if push comes to shove, they can temporarily assign workers to help for 1-2 months if needed. So I do think this is a very petty thing to complain about. While I don't agree with every video game CEO, I do think they know what works best for growth.
|
|
#4369413 - 07/16/17 12:04 AM
Re: Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
[Re: Genbrien]
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 871
Winfield
model citizen
|
model citizen
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 871
QLD
|
Seems to me that Belsimtek are the ones who do all the technicalities behind the modules, ED In Russia 3D model the modules and the only thing the yanks do is test the modules. Does ED in the good ole US of A actually do anything technical other than eat mcdonalds? About the only thing Wags does in ED that I can see is post video's AFTER RUSSIA have finished the modules......Maybe send a few e-mail to the DOD and if he has a hit, employs a lawyer to draft the contact, still not much work involved in that Matt.....
Do any of these testers, forum mods, community managers (all ED Testers mind you, just thought I would chuck in their titles) actually do anything worthwhile with the modules once they have a copy in their greedy little hands? Hardly reporting back any bugs found as all the technical stuff is written in another language,,,,,,Russian. Since there is also a title for ED Translator on the forums, and the rate these people would actually be useful translating the flight manuals. Perhaps the translator could be more useful and receive all the bugs from the English speaking nations, translating them into Russian and e-mailing them direct to Belsimtek.
|
|
#4369415 - 07/16/17 12:32 AM
Re: Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
[Re: Flogger23m]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
For all the hate the industry thinks, I think they know what they're doing. It makes sense from a business standpoint to continue growing. Your stance is more or less this:
Ubisoft is working on Far Cry 4. Therefore, they should can Assassin's Creed Origins, their racing games, mobile games, Watch Dogs and whatever else they are working on. Fire a few thousand workers. That is what you're claiming, but on a smaller scale, for BST/ED. Not a very good analogy... a better one would be... Ubisoft is working on Far Cry 4 and once that gets to alpha/beta, they work on Far Cry 5, and neither one is complete when they start working on Watch Dogs 2, then Far Cry 4 is left in a very buggy state 2 or 3 years later, Far Cry 5 is in open beta, Watch Dogs 2 is just teasers, and then they work on Far Cry 6.... another 2 years down the line and Far Cry 4 is declared "release," Far Cry 5's bugs still aren't squashed, Watch Dogs 2 is nearing alpha, and they announce MORE work in mobile and racing games. They also release a patch to Far Cry 2. My stance is "don't bite off more than you can chew" and for God's sake, swallow before you take another bite!! The F-4E/Mi-24 more that likely have zero effect on the progress of the F-18. If anything it can be a good thing, because if push comes to shove, they can temporarily assign workers to help for 1-2 months if needed. It's been 6-7 years since DCS A10C. How long do they need for DCS F-18? How long has the F-18 been in development? It was supposed to be in public alpha or beta last year, according to their predictions early 2016. They said they'll announce ETA after Normandy has been released.... has Normandy been released yet? So where is ETA? When exactly does push come to shove? So I do think this is a very petty thing to complain about. While I don't agree with every video game CEO, I do think they know what works best for growth. Yeah. And complaining about ED developing 1.5.xx, 2.xx, and 2.5 is also a very petty thing to complain about, right?
- Ice
|
|
#4369453 - 07/16/17 02:17 PM
Re: Belsimtek's Mi-24P and F-4E
[Re: Flogger23m]
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 772
Johnny_Redd
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 772
|
The F-4E/Mi-24 more that likely have zero effect on the progress of the F-18. If anything it can be a good thing, because if push comes to shove, they can temporarily assign workers to help for 1-2 months if needed.
More than likely? Didnt they say, 2 years ago, that the development of DCSWW2 wouldnt impact the other development ED were doing and look how that is working out. ED are a joke, their development incompetencies have a direct impact on everything they and their 3rd parties do. If it doesnt impact the f18, el oh frikin el, one can almost guarantee that something will come along to impact the development of the f4e/mi24 in the future. I would put my house on that. The reason they chose those 2 airframes is obvious, the platform is circling the drain and they need an injection of early access funds. Good luck to all who buy into this BS early access everything is subject to change farce. #notinmylifetime
Last edited by Johnny_Redd; 07/16/17 02:29 PM.
DCS Kickstarter Wags July 2014 "In this July 2014 update, the primary news is in regards to the restructured backer rewards. After a careful review of the older system under RRG, we found it financially unattainable." Wags October 2017 "the investment vs. generated revenue has been excellent for the World War II aircraft. In fact, the P-51D Mustang has twice the cost effectiveness of the A-10C Warthog."
|
|
|
|