#4350196 - 04/10/17 12:52 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: DM]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Jayhawk
Silastic Armorfiend
|
Silastic Armorfiend
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Docking Bay 94
|
Jedi, not "light side Sith", of course brainfart. I'd call that "happy accident", because the Jedi as presented by the prequels are, in the best case, a bunch of incompetent hypocrites, and worst case, not all that different from the Sith. The Sith at least were up front and unapologetic about their methods.
Why men throw their lives away attacking an armed Witcher... I'll never know. Something wrong with my face?
|
|
#4350205 - 04/10/17 01:27 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: Jayhawk]
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,506
DM
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,506
Prague
|
IMO, Star Wars stopped being Star Wars in 1983. Everything coming afterwards is just expensive fan fiction. (Lucas was his own biggest fan, so there! ). Of all the fan fiction since then, I much prefer the animated series "Rebels" to the rest of the material. Oh, and the novel "Lost Stars". Incidentally, both are geared towards a teenage audience, yet are - IMO - better than the big budget movies that have been produced between 1999 and now. I didn't really even dig RoTJ if I'm honest. It fell far, far short of the huge promise of TESB. IMO it should have ended the way it was (allegedly) supposed to end: that Luke went to the dark side to protect his sister. But, Lucas wanted no barriers to selling his Luke Skywalker toy range, so there you have it :/
"They might look the same, but they don't taste the same."
|
|
#4350206 - 04/10/17 01:27 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: PanzerMeyer]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Jayhawk
Silastic Armorfiend
|
Silastic Armorfiend
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Docking Bay 94
|
Jayhawk, I do agree that there is such a thing as over-analyzing/over-thinking a scifi movie or franchise. But hey, us geeks need to stay busy. I was referring to those at Disney in charge of "developing" the franchise (Kennedy and her minions). Geeks on the other hand should over-analyze and then debate endlessly with each other to their heart's content.
Why men throw their lives away attacking an armed Witcher... I'll never know. Something wrong with my face?
|
|
#4350208 - 04/10/17 01:32 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: DM]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Jayhawk
Silastic Armorfiend
|
Silastic Armorfiend
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Docking Bay 94
|
IMO, Star Wars stopped being Star Wars in 1983. Everything coming afterwards is just expensive fan fiction. (Lucas was his own biggest fan, so there! ). Of all the fan fiction since then, I much prefer the animated series "Rebels" to the rest of the material. Oh, and the novel "Lost Stars". Incidentally, both are geared towards a teenage audience, yet are - IMO - better than the big budget movies that have been produced between 1999 and now. I didn't really even dig RoTJ if I'm honest. It fell far, far short of the huge promise of TESB. IMO it should have ended the way it was (allegedly) supposed to end: that Luke went to the dark side to protect his sister. But, Lucas wanted no barriers to selling his Luke Skywalker toy range, so there you have it :/ Figures that the best Star Wars film was the one with which Lucas was least involved. Lucas unfortunately did not understand and recongnize his true strenths, and thought he could do it all by himself.
Why men throw their lives away attacking an armed Witcher... I'll never know. Something wrong with my face?
|
|
#4350209 - 04/10/17 01:37 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: Jayhawk]
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,480
PanzerMeyer
Pro-Consul of Florida
|
Pro-Consul of Florida
King Crimson - SimHQ's Top Poster
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,480
Miami, FL USA
|
I was referring to those at Disney in charge of "developing" the franchinse (Kennedy and her minions).
Ah, ok. Well, until Disney has a Star Wars movie flop at the box office, they won't be changing their methodology any time soon.
“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
|
|
#4350210 - 04/10/17 01:40 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: Jayhawk]
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,506
DM
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,506
Prague
|
Figures that the best Star Wars film was the one with which Lucas was least involved. Lucas unfortunately did not understand and recongnize his true strenths, and thought he could do it all by himself. Lucas is interested in the merchandising primarily. Complex characters gets in the way of that I will give Lucas his dues though - he does recognise good design when he sees it (for the most part. Ewoks and Jabba's palace shenanigans - eeuughhh). For me SW has always been about the design, and proved with the first movie that you cannot spend too much on design. But he himself is not as creative as he's credited for, but he is a good businessman I suppose.
Last edited by DM; 04/10/17 01:41 PM.
"They might look the same, but they don't taste the same."
|
|
#4350227 - 04/10/17 03:04 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: Jayhawk]
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Jedi Master
Entil'zha
|
Entil'zha
Sierra Hotel
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Space Coast, USA
|
IMO, Star Wars stopped being Star Wars in 1983. Everything coming afterwards is just expensive fan fiction. (Lucas was his own biggest fan, so there! ). Of all the fan fiction since then, I much prefer the animated series "Rebels" to the rest of the material. Oh, and the novel "Lost Stars". Incidentally, both are geared towards a teenage audience, yet are - IMO - better than the big budget movies that have been produced between 1999 and now. I didn't really even dig RoTJ if I'm honest. It fell far, far short of the huge promise of TESB. IMO it should have ended the way it was (allegedly) supposed to end: that Luke went to the dark side to protect his sister. But, Lucas wanted no barriers to selling his Luke Skywalker toy range, so there you have it :/ Figures that the best Star Wars film was the one with which Lucas was least involved. Lucas unfortunately did not understand and recongnize his true strenths, and thought he could do it all by himself. You think Rogue One was the best film? That's unusual. The Jedi Master
The anteater is wearing the bagel because he's a reindeer princess. -- my 4 yr old daughter
|
|
#4350266 - 04/10/17 05:13 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: FlyingToaster]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Jayhawk
Silastic Armorfiend
|
Silastic Armorfiend
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Docking Bay 94
|
No, no, O Great Hairsplitter, I was of course referencing the time when he still owned the IP. What Disney is doing to the franchise is SWINO. Just like the reboot of the Trek franchise. I like to call that "total conversion mod". Also, Rogue One is not a Star Wars film, it's a separate film set in Disney's version of the Star Wars universe (different score, no title crawl...). The hairsplitting apprentice has now become the master.
Why men throw their lives away attacking an armed Witcher... I'll never know. Something wrong with my face?
|
|
#4350268 - 04/10/17 05:19 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: DM]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Jayhawk
Silastic Armorfiend
|
Silastic Armorfiend
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Docking Bay 94
|
Figures that the best Star Wars film was the one with which Lucas was least involved. Lucas unfortunately did not understand and recongnize his true strenths, and thought he could do it all by himself. Lucas is interested in the merchandising primarily. Complex characters gets in the way of that I will give Lucas his dues though - he does recognise good design when he sees it (for the most part. Ewoks and Jabba's palace shenanigans - eeuughhh). For me SW has always been about the design, and proved with the first movie that you cannot spend too much on design. But he himself is not as creative as he's credited for, but he is a good businessman I suppose. IMO Lucas did quite a lot more. Together with Spielberg he basically invented the modern blockbuster. He revolutionized special effects. And he found a way to make schlock enjoyable to watch, and how to make a "Sithload" of money from selling merchandise. The idea for Star Wars basically comes from a guy who loved Kurosawa films and combined those with old Flash Gordon/ Buck Rogers serials. And then...went nuts.
Why men throw their lives away attacking an armed Witcher... I'll never know. Something wrong with my face?
|
|
#4350272 - 04/10/17 05:22 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: Jayhawk]
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,480
PanzerMeyer
Pro-Consul of Florida
|
Pro-Consul of Florida
King Crimson - SimHQ's Top Poster
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,480
Miami, FL USA
|
The idea for Star Wars basically comes from a guy who loved Kurosawa films and combined those with old Flash Gordon/ Buck Rogers serials.
Genau! When I first watched "The Hidden Fortress" by Kurosawa I was really stunned at the similarities between the princess and the two peasants with Leia/C3PO/R2D2. The inspiration was undeniable.
Last edited by PanzerMeyer; 04/10/17 05:23 PM.
“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
|
|
#4350278 - 04/10/17 05:36 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: Falstar]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Jayhawk
Silastic Armorfiend
|
Silastic Armorfiend
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Docking Bay 94
|
WHAT not a Star Wars film... Exactly. Not a Star Wars (tm) film. A Star Wars related story in the Star Wars universe. According to Disney, only films following the, let's call it Main Quest, are officially Star Wars films: Episodes I through whenever they are finished. The stand alone films (Rogue One, Han Solo, Boba Fett, Lando, Young Jabba, whatever) are considered "filler", or "Side Quests". Hence no "Star Wars" in the logo, a different score and no title crawl.
Why men throw their lives away attacking an armed Witcher... I'll never know. Something wrong with my face?
|
|
#4350283 - 04/10/17 06:12 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: FlyingToaster]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Jayhawk
Silastic Armorfiend
|
Silastic Armorfiend
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Docking Bay 94
|
And apparently he's already regretting having sold it to Disney. I would have taken the money, renamed Skywalker Ranch into Howard the Duck Ranch (oh no, wait, isn't Howard the Duck also Disney's IP?Had a cameo in Guardians of the Galaxy, so he probably belongs to Disney), and forget about the whole thing. Easy when you have an additional four billion reasons to forget. And he can now focus on making Red Tails 2.
Why men throw their lives away attacking an armed Witcher... I'll never know. Something wrong with my face?
|
|
#4350285 - 04/10/17 06:15 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: Jayhawk]
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,480
PanzerMeyer
Pro-Consul of Florida
|
Pro-Consul of Florida
King Crimson - SimHQ's Top Poster
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,480
Miami, FL USA
|
And he can now focus on making Red Tails 2. LOL Jayhawk. You're on a roll today! Making a Red Tails 2 should qualify as a crime against humanity as per The Hague Convention.
“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
|
|
#4350292 - 04/10/17 06:36 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: Jayhawk]
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,465
Bib4Tuna
I will take you to Jabba
|
I will take you to Jabba
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,465
NC, USA
|
WHAT not a Star Wars film... Exactly. Not a Star Wars (tm) film. A Star Wars related story in the Star Wars universe. According to Disney, only films following the, let's call it Main Quest, are officially Star Wars films: Episodes I through whenever they are finished. The stand alone films (Rogue One, Han Solo, Boba Fett, Lando, Young Jabba, whatever) are considered "filler", or "Side Quests". Hence no "Star Wars" in the logo, a different score and no title crawl. Unofficially, any stories (movies) where C3PO or R2 are not directly involved (in many and varying degrees) are Extended Universe, since they are the witnesses to the story, Especially R2, since 3PO's memory was wiped. Rogue One falls more in the category or Clone Wars and Rebels....and the Ewoks cartoons. For me, these are just fan-fic stories. I don't need fan service. The movies have shown to me that Star Wars is best when it's telling a new (separate) story. When it tries to tie things together or do any kind of prequel, it just messes things up. and need to force apologetic arguments to glue things together so they still make sense. Still, if anybody would make the Timothy Zahn's Thrawn quadrology (soon to be a pentalogy....ummm...quintology?) as movies, I would pay good money to see that....even though they were disavowed when Disney bought the rights.
Last edited by Bib4Tuna; 04/10/17 06:48 PM.
|
|
#4350297 - 04/10/17 06:44 PM
Re: Star Wars Rogue One
[Re: Falstar]
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,480
PanzerMeyer
Pro-Consul of Florida
|
Pro-Consul of Florida
King Crimson - SimHQ's Top Poster
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,480
Miami, FL USA
|
Does he get any royalties from lets say, "Robot Chicken" and the gay xxx parodies?
My understanding is no because usually parodies are exempt from copyright issues. For example, I don't think Mel Brooks had to pay Lucas for making "Spaceballs".
Last edited by PanzerMeyer; 04/10/17 06:45 PM.
“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|