#4252179 - 04/23/16 01:36 PM
Re: Not so large
[Re: KraziKanuK]
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 24,075
oldgrognard
Administrator
|
Administrator
Lifer
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 24,075
USA
|
That is a good comparison. I too would have thought differently.
Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
Someday your life will flash in front of your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
|
|
#4252184 - 04/23/16 01:46 PM
Re: Not so large
[Re: KraziKanuK]
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,872
F4UDash4
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,872
SC
|
Keep in mind that oiler beside Iowa is almost 40 years newer. Regardless, the Iowa class BB's still rank as some of the largest warships ever built. If they were active today the only other active warships larger than the Iowas would be US nuclear carriers and Russian Kuznetsov and Kiev class carriers.
So yes, Iowas are BIG warships.
"In the vast library of socialist books, there’s not a single volume on how to create wealth, only how to take and “redistribute” it.” - David Horowitz
|
|
#4252186 - 04/23/16 01:51 PM
Re: Not so large
[Re: Lieste]
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,872
F4UDash4
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,872
SC
|
Dunno, she's still some 180ft longer than the "stretched"AO next to her and 9000 tonnes greater displacement. Actually closer to 20000 tons greater displacement, when finally retired the Iowas were rated at about 58,000 tons.
"In the vast library of socialist books, there’s not a single volume on how to create wealth, only how to take and “redistribute” it.” - David Horowitz
|
|
#4252225 - 04/23/16 04:19 PM
Re: Not so large
[Re: KraziKanuK]
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,581
Raw Kryptonite
Beat the Kobayashi Maru
|
Beat the Kobayashi Maru
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,581
MS
|
I'd say they're large, it's just that those ships are larger than expected. I toured the Alabama, which isn't even an Iowa class. It was immense and like an ant hill on the inside. LOL
·Steam: Raw Kryptonite ·MWO & Elite Dangerous: Defcon Won ·Meager youtube channel·Intel i5-9600K ·EVGA GTX1070 FTW 8GB ·EVGA CLC 120 Cooler ·16 GB Patriot Memory VIPER 4 3000MHz ·GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS PRO WiFi Mobo · CORSAIR CARBIDE AIR 540 case ·BenQ BL3200PT monitor
|
|
#4252365 - 04/24/16 04:30 AM
Re: Not so large
[Re: KraziKanuK]
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,543
Timothy
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,543
Phoenix - Ft. Carson
|
Last edited by Timothy; 04/24/16 04:43 AM.
Keep Calm and Check CanopyThere are no ex-paratroopers, only ones off jump statusLearn Economics at: http://www.mises.orgCarthago delenda est
|
|
#4252366 - 04/24/16 04:42 AM
Re: Not so large
[Re: KraziKanuK]
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,113
KraziKanuK
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,113
Ottawa Canada
|
Has the Olympia been fixed up Timothy? It was in pretty bad shape not to long ago.
There was only 16 squadrons of RAF fighters that used 100 octane during the BoB. The Fw190A could not fly with the outer cannon removed. There was no Fw190A-8s flying with the JGs in 1945.
|
|
#4252368 - 04/24/16 04:46 AM
Re: Not so large
[Re: KraziKanuK]
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,543
Timothy
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,543
Phoenix - Ft. Carson
|
Has the Olympia been fixed up Timothy? It was in pretty bad shape not to long ago. They are working on it, but it's got a long way to go. I saw it in 2010 and then 2014 and it was worlds better, so there are signs of hope. I'm sure the turrets are in bad shape, they aren't even original, which is disappointing. They are just steel plate and not armoured turrets.
Keep Calm and Check CanopyThere are no ex-paratroopers, only ones off jump statusLearn Economics at: http://www.mises.orgCarthago delenda est
|
|
#4252401 - 04/24/16 08:47 AM
Re: Not so large
[Re: Timothy]
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,534
Alicatt
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,534
Ice Cold in Alex or Eating in ...
|
The USS New Jersey <snip> Timothy, can you check your meds please Get well soon Great pics by the way
Chlanna nan con thigibh a so's gheibh sibh feoil Sons of the hound come here and get flesh Clan Cameron
|
|
#4252416 - 04/24/16 10:52 AM
Re: Not so large
[Re: KraziKanuK]
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,740
FlashBurn
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,740
Washington State, USA
|
Well... War ships have always been traditionally smaller than jumbo merchants. Bigger you are the slower you maneuver. Although not always the case any more. I am sure something like QE2 was bigger than an Iowa class. Well in terms of size. QE might even be bigger than those 2 freakishly large super battleships Japan had back in the day. Or I am totally wrong.
OOPs not QE2...just QE. The first one. Not the other one. Or I guess the new one. Ugh confusing.
Last edited by FlashBurn; 04/24/16 10:55 AM.
|
|
#4252417 - 04/24/16 11:10 AM
Re: Not so large
[Re: KraziKanuK]
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,113
KraziKanuK
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,113
Ottawa Canada
|
RMS QE Type: Ocean liner Tonnage: 83,673 gross tons Displacement: 83,000+ tonnes Length: 1,031 ft (314.2 m) Beam: 118 ft (36.0 m) Height: 233 ft (71.0 m) Draught: 38 ft (11.6 m)
Yamato Class and type: Yamato-class battleship Displacement: 65,027 t (64,000 long tons) 71,659 t (70,527 long tons) (full load)
Length: 256 m (839 ft 11 in) (waterline) 263 m (862 ft 10 in) (overall)
Beam: 38.9 m (127 ft 7 in) Draft: 11 m (36 ft 1 in)
There was only 16 squadrons of RAF fighters that used 100 octane during the BoB. The Fw190A could not fly with the outer cannon removed. There was no Fw190A-8s flying with the JGs in 1945.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|