Wags request info to the community (post answers on the ED forum post)

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=151627&page=3

Maps, maps and more maps.
I'd also like to see more FC3 aircraft. The wait for high fidelity aircraft is way too long and appears beyond most 3rd party skill sets.
Vietnam war era aircraft.
Oh and better effects. I'll admit the P-51 gun smoke is waaaaaaaaaaaaaay better in 1.5

I was tempted to write in "more companies to compete for our hard-earned dollars" - given how pathetic ED is half the time. In the end I decided to curb the cynicism and went with the 4th gen multirole fighters. Still waiting for a high-fidelity F-18. Once you have that, then dynamic campaign becomes the next priority in my book.

I don't really see grounds for objecting over the question being asked. Even if the cynical view is correct and E.D. doesn't choose to pursue whatever wins the poll (currently, Dynamic Campaign), it makes it easier for enterprising 3rd parties to see where the highest interest levels are. Having the information out in plain view should be a good thing.

Just wondering, are PMs still a thing or do people enjoy having it out with each other in public at the expense of the topic? How bout a poll?

Anyways since the biggest issue I have with DCS at the moment is justifying why I am risking my virtual pilot in a virtual war, I went with the DC.

DYNAMIC CAMPAIGN IS NEEDED

Dynamic Campaign is not must imo.

The point of immersion in Falcon4 IMO is UI that's being able to analyze battlefield, threats and activities (Recon) and then plan flight (Add-flight), so you feel you are reacting to the changing situation.

So I would say, "being able to create Air-Tasking-Order while mission is running"

Gents,

I temporarily locked this thread so I could do some clean up. It's a simple poll...let's not "over-think" it and devolve this topic into something that has nothing to do with the poll.

If there is a choice on the poll you want to discuss...let's hear it.

Stay on topic please.




( I voted for Dynamic Campaign)

Dynamic Campaign! DYNAMIC CAMPAIGN!DYNAMIC CAMPAIGN! DYNAMIC CAMPAIGN! DYNAMIC CAMPAIGN! DYNAMIC CAMPAIGN!

what is missing in my opinion is

^ This.

Seriously, I'd spend a lot more time with DCS if it had a DC. And I already own like 8 modules. I just don't actually fly them.

One thing that I think is going to be interesting about this poll is it kinda draws a red line in the sand so to speak. As of now the Dynamic campaign seems to be the runaway favorite, I know I voted for it cause the multi role fighter is already supposed to be well under development. In my opinion ED will now have to say ok, we hear you, let's do it!!! Or give a pretty convincing explanation of why it's not going to happen. I guess the other option would be to say; it's in the plans but don't expect to see it this decade.

Aircraft. No More Trainers! Except for the T-38
F-16
F-18

MiG-17
MiG-19
MiG-23 Should be at the top of the MiG list.
MiG-31

Maps
Vietnam
Middle East (Heck give me a generic one)
Europe

Any of these things would make me happy.

Flaming Cliffs 4

I would like more FC level aircraft, I love flying the SU-25 and I want more of the same - F-15E Strike Eagle, Mig-23, Tornado GR-1, Saab Gripen please.

Anything about mission content, AI actors (ATC, wingman, etc.), and the ability to save/edit/resume single and multiplayer flights.

DCS is a very good race car without the racetrack or race to enjoy it in.

Dynamic campaign engine.

AH64

Dynamic campaign. Nothing else is even remotely as important as this.

It's the reason I've been playing Falcon 4 and it's variants for the past 200 years.

ED once said that the vast majority of customers are playing SP (~80% IIRC).
So ANY feature in the sim that can support this group should be implemented.
Mission creation is tedious for the casual player and the mission generator
could be taken as a base to work from.