First of all, I am not "slating" anyone.
As for this:
Then then was a very sensitive issue with a number of our developers I won't go into for contractual reasons.
Why even mention this? Not only was it a private matter, but you're being vague about it now in public. I'll clarify for you (and I still have the original e-mail you sent, and the entire exchange that followed).
Whilst Chris hides behind NDA (or something), what happened is he alleged (without proof, and despite multiple requests for same) that AvioDev had tried to poach his developers (non-specific developers, I might add). We did no such thing. The domain name he alleged was used to send these e-mails ISN'T EVEN REGISTERED (I have screenshots from a major domain name registrar from the time of the allegations).
Once again, I ask Chris to demonstrate proof of his allegations, but I strongly suspect he will once again refuse.
I'm not going to argue here in public, however I will say that hiding behind contracts/NDA as if it somehow demonstrates fact is just unbelievable.
May I suggest that people be very careful about slander.
I will not respond to any further posts anywhere about this. If Chris wishes to produce evidence of his allegations, he knows where to contact me. If he once again refuses to provide evidence of his allegations, I shall consider the matter closed and he is not to mention it again.
We are "sifting" through the code to fix radios and other issues because quite frankly, despite numerous requests, I had no response from Tango and we had to allocate another developer to Hawk.
Chris knows the EXACT situation regarding the communications radios, but due to NDA I can not say anything here (nice try). What I can say is they do not work in the C-101 for the same reason they do not work in Hawk (anyone with both products can easily verify the comms radios currently do not work). Not sure what is meant by "sifting through the code to fix radios".
I will monitor this thread, but not reply to it further.
Tango.