|
#4009314 - 09/13/14 04:48 PM
Re: Bug reports
[Re: Cat]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,011
piston79
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,011
|
Just refreshing memories: Easiest answer is that Plamya use different program codes, for the different tasks.
(manual page 17)
Plamja-KV CVM (digital computer)
The digital computer has a 16bit processor, running at 64kHz frequency.
It has 256 bytes of RAM, and 4,096 bytes of ROM.
It has five built-in programs:
1. Idle
In this mode, the Plamja-KV is calculating the firing solution using the instantaneously available data from the RPC.
2. IADS target acquisition
In this mode, the Plamja-KV is interpolating the target's predicted position, between the 10Hz updates received from the IADS information.
3. Target tracking
In this mode, the Plamja-KV is continuously calculating the target's predicted path, and figuring the firing solution based on this information.
4. Tracking Jamming Target
In this mode, the Plamja-KV is calculating the firing solution using a manually preset target range. This mode is called AS-2.
5. Self Test
I think, that CVK always DO a firing solution, no matter how the data is inputed on it (manually, by "local sensors" (those MD buttons and red lights) or by IADS. The real behaviour of the system is a mystical process for me, understanding the behaviour is a key for a bug findings or some mistery solving (04.10.2001 - Tu-154M)...
Last edited by piston79; 09/13/14 04:53 PM.
|
|
#4015031 - 09/27/14 11:14 AM
Re: Bug reports
[Re: piston79]
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hpasp
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hungary, Europe
|
SA-5According to "Manual of battle work of S-200B", page 146,- "RABOTA PO V" knob must be in "AVTOPEREZAHVAT VIKL" mode by default.... Link That switch behavior is not simulated.
|
|
|
#4015032 - 09/27/14 11:17 AM
Re: Bug reports
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,011
piston79
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,011
|
That switch behavior is not simulated.
So, does it mean that it must stay wrong??? As it is like now, we had AS on epsilon/beta only... 
Last edited by piston79; 09/27/14 11:19 AM.
|
|
|
#4015033 - 09/27/14 11:17 AM
Re: Bug reports
[Re: piston79]
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hpasp
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hungary, Europe
|
1S12 screen - OAF scenario: the Ashuluk is drawn on the glass. The drawing is appearing only when the power is on... On what date/position?
|
|
|
#4015034 - 09/27/14 11:20 AM
Re: Bug reports
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,011
piston79
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,011
|
1S12 screen - OAF scenario: the Ashuluk is drawn on the glass. The drawing is appearing only when the power is on... On what date/position? 2-th of may.... But I think it is for all of dates...
|
|
|
#4015045 - 09/27/14 11:45 AM
Re: Bug reports
[Re: Cat]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,011
piston79
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,011
|
SA-5:
On Tallin scenario, managed to shoot at receding SR-71 and got it down... According to manuals, we could engage receding targets with 300 m/s....
Last edited by piston79; 09/27/14 11:45 AM.
|
|
|
#4015087 - 09/27/14 01:26 PM
Re: Bug reports
[Re: max2012]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,011
piston79
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,011
|
Strange if another shoot at moving away goal, then the maximum speed of 300 m / s, why do Volkhov then 420 m / s, Volkhov system older than Vega rocket and she also weaker.
At the C-200 'Vega' Hypersonic missile, the idea should not be a problem, it just easily catch up with the target.
No idea... Probably due to SARH method...
|
|
|
#4015096 - 09/27/14 02:01 PM
Re: Bug reports
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,180
scrim
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,180
|
Hmmm, a lucky shot.  You think that's a lucky shot? Then you obviously ain't seen this AAR yet: 14:40 19th of December, 1972.
SR-71 bomb damage assessment flight number two.
SA-75M Dvina
+++++++++++++++++
00:00:43, SNR ON AIR
00:03:27, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-1
Target distance: 58km
Target azimuth: 264°
Target elevation: 24°
Target altitude: 24,2km
SNR mode: 110km
Missile guidance method: UPR (Half Lead)
00:03:33, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-2
Target distance: 58km
Target azimuth: 267°
Target elevation: 26°
Target altitude: 26,4km
SNR mode: 110km
Missile guidance method: T/T (Three Point)
00:03:40, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-3
Target distance: 58km
Target azimuth: 271°
Target elevation: 30°
Target altitude: 29,6km
SNR mode: 110km
Missile guidance method: T/T (Three Point)
00:03:52, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-1
Target distance: 58km
Target azimuth: 282°
Target elevation: 36°
Target altitude: 35,4km
SNR mode: 110km
Missile guidance method: T/T (Three Point)
00:04:36, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-2
Target distance: 58km
Target azimuth: 38°
Target elevation: 57°
Target altitude: 49,7km
SNR mode: 110km
Missile guidance method: T/T (Three Point)
00:04:46, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-3
Target distance: 58km
Target azimuth: 62°
Target elevation: 49°
Target altitude: 44,7km
SNR mode: 110km
Missile guidance method: T/T (Three Point)
00:04:49, Missile exploded on Channel-1
SR-71 Habu killed by SAM. (miss distance: 88m)
00:06:32, V-750VMVK 11DMVK Missile launched on Channel-1
Target distance: 42km
Target azimuth: 89°
Target elevation: 20°
Target altitude: 14,6km
SNR mode: 110km
Missile guidance method: K (Half Lead Elevated By Constans)
00:09:07, SNR OFF THE AIR
-----------------
Total, SNR On Air Time: 8min 21sec TL;DR Shot down a Blackbird with an SA-2F  . To be fair though, something must've glitched because the jammer wasn't on, or at least not having any effect on me. I'm guessing the same goes for the various other anti SAM systems that have been mentioned in this sub forum if they're modeled as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
