#3921801 - 03/08/14 07:01 AM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov (SA-2E Guideline)
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 203
Lonewolf357
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 203
|
We had kept in Hungary the old Dvina (PAA cabins) equipment that were able to emit, nothing more, after upgrading them to Volhov. So it looks like "Dubler" was not exported even to the closest allies, strictly for Soviet PVO... Weird.
Last edited by Lonewolf357; 03/08/14 07:02 AM.
|
|
#3921806 - 03/08/14 07:18 AM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov (SA-2E Guideline)
[Re: Lonewolf357]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
piston79
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
|
So it looks like "Dubler" was not exported even to the closest allies, strictly for Soviet PVO... Weird.
I think it never was fielded, even in USSR....
|
|
#3932747 - 03/31/14 08:41 PM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov (SA-2E Guideline)
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
piston79
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
|
U-2 track: http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/cuba_mis_cri/dobbs/anderson_shootdown.kmz Here - the "killer" site, just hours before shotting Rudolf Anderson:
Last edited by piston79; 04/04/14 06:59 PM.
|
|
#3934909 - 04/05/14 11:49 AM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov (SA-2E Guideline)
[Re: Cat]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
piston79
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
|
|
|
#3961177 - 06/01/14 05:05 PM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov (SA-2E Guideline)
[Re: piston79]
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hpasp
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hungary, Europe
|
I am sorry for the dumb question, but from where we knew that UPR is up to 4 degrees? I would be very happy to see an official document describing UPR limitation. So far I received contradicting lectures from different Volhov system military high school teachers, both with convincing arguments for 3.5 and 4 degrees. Sim is using 4 degrees, as I was unable to decide between them. (changing it is just rewriting one character in the code for me...)
Last edited by Hpasp; 06/01/14 07:15 PM.
|
|
#3961186 - 06/01/14 05:25 PM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov (SA-2E Guideline)
[Re: Cat]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
piston79
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
|
All good health !
quote: Originally posted by piston79:
The missile can deviate by + -4 degrees line CHP- Target... quote:
Where did you get this information ? This is not so . During my service, when the C -75 was already old and was an urgent need to extend the service life of equipment SAMs was devised and put into operation a military system(rational system maintenance) . Under this system, instead of the weekly routine maintenance ( 8:00 hours) produced advanced functional control of missile guidance ( 1:00 hour) . One of the tests was as follows - " shooting VM" . Set angular speed - 1.5 deg / sec , the approach speed of 500 m / sec and at a certain distance produced start -missile (electronic shot) natural method UPR ( PS ) . On the screens of SNR measured leading angle under normal adjustment value preemption equipment must be within 6 + / - 1 deg . So you are wrong . The missile can deviate in anticipation of more than 4 degrees. Also had this: P.S. It won't be so easy, because you got to rework the lead behaviour at all (IMHHHO)...
|
|
#3961199 - 06/01/14 06:07 PM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov (SA-2E Guideline)
[Re: piston79]
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hpasp
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hungary, Europe
|
6 + / - 1 deg is right for the NEVA. To analyze this issue, you need to deeply understand the missile tracking system of the Volhov system. The flying missile beacon is ALWAYS tracked by the P-11V/P12V wide-beam antenna pair. If the missile beacon signal is not received by these two antennas, the missile is lost. My question is for you, to tell me (based on your knowledge) the area, where the missile beacon is received by BOTH wide-beam antenna system.
Last edited by Hpasp; 06/01/14 06:09 PM.
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|