#3895646 - 01/15/14 05:37 PM
Does anyone ever think about "W/OFF for WW2"?
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 187
nhill40
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 187
|
Or am alone here? It's just sort of an idle/fantasy or daydream, but sometimes I wonder what you could pull off - given the time/talent/money - in terms of making a CFS3 "total conversion" (which I consider WOFF to be) for WW2? Granted, this is kind of an oxymoron because CFS3 originally WAS set in WW2, but anyone who has ever fired up stock CFS3 can tell you it is not a strong effort (which makes WOFF all the more remarkable). I've messed around a bit with some community created "hobby mods" (i.e. not payware) like ETO, MAW, PTO just to see what they were like and I came away thinking they were really quite good for "hobby mod" standards, but at the same time wondering what the potential would be for a WOFF-level quality "total conversion" with all the immersion and amazing career/campaign bells & whistles. One challenge I can imagine is how widespread the air fighting was in WW2 relative to the First World War (a huge amount of action was concentrated along a few hundred miles of frontline), so it would probably be very difficult to model to the same level of campaign detail across the span of WW2...but you could maybe start module by module - e.g. Battle of France, Early/Mid/Late Pacific Theater, etc. I know BOBII achieves this goal quite well for the Battle of Britain (and they have a France mod as well), just daydreaming a bit about "what could be" for the CFS3 engine...
|
|
|
#3895649 - 01/15/14 05:43 PM
Re: Does anyone ever think about "W/OFF for WW2"?
[Re: nhill40]
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,739
Olham
Barmy Baron from Berlin
|
Barmy Baron from Berlin
Hotshot
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,739
|
No time for that - I have all hands full to get to grips with my WW1 flying.
Vice-President of the BOC (Barmy OFFers Club) Member of the 'Albatros Aviators Club' - "We know how to die with Style!"
|
|
|
#3895653 - 01/15/14 05:46 PM
Re: Does anyone ever think about "W/OFF for WW2"?
[Re: nhill40]
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,808
Adger
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,808
|
Good Post nHill...the problem Maybe that ww2,s really been done to death,ive got no doubts whatsoever that OBD could do a great ww2 sim,but when you can pick up IL2 1946 for less than a tenner,then get UP3 ,Dark Blue mod for it for nothing as a download Also same for BOB 2 with BDG mod...but id still seriously be interested in ANY project that OBD come up with ps.....Do you know what id like to see from someone....A Vietnam campaign,i know there,s Wings Over Vietnam (good but too Arcadey) IMO,but i remember flying Hundreds of hours in Flight of the Intruder (Who remembers that) lol,and loving every single minute...a good Vietnam sim and id be there like a shot...Ive Even got the name for you Pol and Winding Man.....Wings Over Vietnams,fields and ERR Rice Paddies,I wont copyright it just yet ha ha
They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old: Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn. At the going down of the sun and in the morning We will remember them.
|
|
|
#3895691 - 01/15/14 07:01 PM
Re: Does anyone ever think about "W/OFF for WW2"?
[Re: nhill40]
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 487
speck01
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 487
California
|
I'm pretty sure one of the WOFF devs hinted recently in a post that was something they were thinking of. I'd buy it for sure based on the WOFF campaign experience.
Last edited by speck01; 01/15/14 07:02 PM. Reason: typo
|
|
|
#3895714 - 01/15/14 07:37 PM
Re: Does anyone ever think about "W/OFF for WW2"?
[Re: nhill40]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 187
nhill40
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 187
|
I agree very much with Adger that one of the primary deterrents to such an effort is that WW2 has been done SO many times (often very well, such as IL-2 + mods) - that sub-genre is really flooded with competition. In my mind, really what you would be paying for if OBD made a run at it is "immersion factor" - all the stuff built *around* the actual flying that makes WOFF so hard to step away from. Truthfully, there is probably only a small subset of the sim community that truly values that (or values that so far above & beyond eye/ear candy, multiplayer support, etc) that they would be wiling to hand over some hard-earned money for a "CFS3 WW2 Total Conversion" (name TBD ) I can say for myself if OBD ever did anything WW2 related, my credit card would probably involuntarily spring from my wallet.
|
|
|
#3896216 - 01/16/14 04:16 PM
Re: Does anyone ever think about "W/OFF for WW2"?
[Re: nhill40]
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 103
SneakyPete
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 103
Newark UK
|
I'm just deciding whether to pull the trigger on WOFF or not. I'm Having trouble tracking down my CFS3 disk!
The other thing is that WW2 is more appealing to me personally. There are a few good WW2 sims around now though what with Team Fusions efforts on CLOD and the current work on the new IL2 BOS. I must admit the last thing I wanted was a 'tarted up' version of IL2 however good it turns out to be. I guess I should be thankful for any sim in production these days though.
Something that the Flight Sim genre is missing in my opinion is Korea. Migs v Sabres (and the rest), guns only, what's not to like? I hope somebody gets around to it before long and fills the gap between WW2 and modern.
Intel I7 8700k @4,8 MSI GTX1070 16GB ram Windows 10 64 bit
|
|
|
#3896257 - 01/16/14 05:10 PM
Re: Does anyone ever think about "W/OFF for WW2"?
[Re: nhill40]
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 997
HumanDrone
Just shoot me...
|
Just shoot me...
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 997
Near Pittsburgh, PA USA
|
There was talk at simouthouse about how good WOFF is and what would happen if OBD could do the same for WWII. But as others have said, WWII has been done and done and done.
In my wildest dream, someone at Microsoft (or even a real software development company) looks at WOFF and says, "Yeah, we may not make a bundle on it, but it deserves something better than CFS3 as a base, and we're willing to free this into a world of multicore processors, massive RAM, and new graphics cards. It will be part of our reputation, so it's not as much of a money maker as it is an image maker. We'll be known for our flight simulation engine."
<Sigh> I know, the stars will fall from the heavens first...
Box: Win7 Pro 64 bit / I72600K @4.1 GHz / EVGA GTX1080Ti/ 16GB RAM / Corsair 240 GB SSD / WD 600 GB Velociraptor / 1050W Power FS Stuff: Saitek X52 Pro Stick/Throttle & Combat Rudder Pedals, TrackIR 5 Sims: FSX Gold, REX 2.0 OD, UTX-NA, FSGenesis 10m mesh/ CFS3 ETO 1.40/Wings Over Flanders Fields BH&H2 (more gorgeous than ever!) Proud BOC inductee 4/30/12!
|
|
|
#3896295 - 01/16/14 06:08 PM
Re: Does anyone ever think about "W/OFF for WW2"?
[Re: nhill40]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 187
nhill40
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 187
|
Apparently I'm not the only one, then! Some interesting ideas in this thread (as well as some "nay" votes). One thing I really like about WOFF is it really lets you feel the ebb & flow of the air war - which is exactly what sucked me into Red Baron WAY back into the day. I haven't really played any WW2 sims that really recreate this in a cohesive package like WOFF does. Sure, you can string together multiple IL-2 campaigns and sort of experience it that way, but it's not the same thing. It would be a monumental effort, no doubt...but I think a lot of OBD's experience and improvements would translate over nicely, so that may level the playing field a bit.
|
|
|
#3896305 - 01/16/14 06:15 PM
Re: Does anyone ever think about "W/OFF for WW2"?
[Re: nhill40]
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,474
JFM
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,474
Naples, FL
|
"WOKP." +1.
WW2 has been done and done and done, I agree. Except: the PTO. It's only been done half-arsed, in my experience. Love to see a full monty version. Just doing the proper naval ships would be a huge task.
HumanDrone, you are right. A longtime friend of mine has been employed with Microsoft and worked on various flight sims. He's shown me some inside figures on what their flight sims made versus other sims/games. I don't want to quote him here without his permission, but I'll say that certain flight sims generated about $100 million-ish total per release (a rough average), while Halo 4 generated $220 million during the first 24 hours after release. Thus, you can see why flight sims are not on their radar.
Last edited by JFM; 01/16/14 06:16 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|