#3677058 - 11/07/12 09:31 AM
Re: [APOS] March 2013 update (news)
[Re: andrey12345]
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 132
rostov
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 132
China
|
Thank you for your quick reply, where can I find a full changelist about this patch, so I can translate and inform my friends. OK, found in the patch file,HOHO.
Last edited by rostov; 11/07/12 12:25 PM.
|
|
#3696418 - 12/10/12 08:10 PM
Re: [APOS] March 2013 update (news)
[Re: Wodin]
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 925
andrey12345
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 925
|
|
|
#3696487 - 12/10/12 09:41 PM
Re: [APOS] March 2013 update (news)
[Re: FlashBurn]
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 216
Void
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 216
Prague
|
Actually would be nice if red army/ german period icons where used depending on which side you played. A simple print out key for the budding battle commander to refer too.
+1
I5-4670@4.4Ghz, MSI Z87-G45,Crucial Ballistics lp 8Gb Ram, Crucial MX100 256 SSD, GTX 980, 1980x1080, Win10 64
|
|
#3696502 - 12/10/12 09:59 PM
Re: [APOS] March 2013 update (news)
[Re: andrey12345]
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,426
Wodin
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,426
Liverpool
|
WOW..love it..authentic symbols...superb...I agree would be cool if you had both German and Rec Army symbols depending on what side your playing. I wouldn't want to see NATO symbols..I want authenticity and it wouldn't take long to learn them...educating
Last edited by Wodin; 12/10/12 10:04 PM.
|
|
#3696580 - 12/11/12 12:22 AM
Re: [APOS] March 2013 update (news)
[Re: andrey12345]
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,426
Wodin
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,426
Liverpool
|
Dane.. thats taking abit too far I think it's still a game. I do like period symbols in wargames not enough use them and it's good to see Graviteam do it, however I think it needs to be like Flash says it wouldn't make sense only having one sides symbol set esp if your playing the other side so to speak.
Dane you will get used to the if you use them or stick with what we have now as I expect you will have a choice.
You never know Dane someone will mod it to NATO or the game may come with NATO aswell..I don't think they look any less "clean" than NATO symbols..infact they look quite cool in comparison. At one point you had to learn NATO symbols..I'm sure you will pick this up aswell.
Last edited by Wodin; 12/11/12 12:23 AM.
|
|
#3696696 - 12/11/12 05:12 AM
Re: [APOS] March 2013 update (news)
[Re: Dane49]
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,740
FlashBurn
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,740
Washington State, USA
|
Well if your going into that much depth over authenticity,then you might as well go all the way and only include the period maps that each side had to refer to,and not the one that is displayed now in all its fine and accurate detail.Since I'm not really keen on authenticity at this level,I still prefer the clean and easily read NATO symbols to go with the clean looking and accurate map we now have. In theory I agree completely. But I think our view is the minority. Also it would appear maps are generated direct from source files for the polygon. Meaning that yes indeed they are vary precise in some ways, but IMO do mot show enough detail for mild contours. Which means not a darn thing is actually wrong.
|
|
#3697020 - 12/11/12 06:14 PM
Re: [APOS] March 2013 update (news)
[Re: andrey12345]
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 128
Richie61
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 128
New England, USA
|
It's WWII, not the Cold War. Every war out there today has NATO icons, so I don't feel we need another one. IMO. Question. Did the Warsaw Pact use NATO symbols?
"You win some, lose some, and wreck some."
Dale Earnhardt
|
|
|
|