#3652470 - 09/28/12 04:09 PM
new RC patch Sept 28th 2012: many more new fixes + SU-26, CoD is starting to look good
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 831
rootango
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 831
everywhere
|
the new RC patch is listing many fixes for aircraft FM's, various bugs, and even includes the long awaited SU-26 CoD is starting to gradually look good to early to conclude anything firm yet, but first reports indicate further fpsec improvements, better high altitude clouds, and improved net code. for those who are testing the patch in the next few days, give us your reports
Be advised, we got zips in the wire
|
|
#3652546 - 09/28/12 06:24 PM
Re: new RC patch Sept 28th 2012: many more new fixes + SU-26, CoD is starting to look good
[Re: rootango]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 831
rootango
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 831
everywhere
|
Hein,
true, but i am going to be mostly on the lookout for FM fixes (spit and hurricane speed and climb rates etc), as well as some important fixes like errors of certain controls etc. new added features are a bonus (new planes), and so far the cloud improvements being reported look also positive
fingers crossed luthier and team put some effort into addressing some of the major bugs and errors (as well as continued to improve performance of fpsec and general fluidity of the game grafix)
Be advised, we got zips in the wire
|
|
#3652700 - 09/28/12 11:01 PM
Re: new RC patch Sept 28th 2012: many more new fixes + SU-26, CoD is starting to look good
[Re: rootango]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,118
Brigstock
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,118
London, England
|
Here's a FM fix for you The new patch has porked the RAF aircraft. Can't start any of them from cold. (ie when on line) It seems only the Spit 2a will start. It's been reported on the banana forum. Looks like the A/C are too cold for the Glycol to kick in. Rolling back to the previous beta......
|
|
#3652770 - 09/29/12 01:34 AM
Re: new RC patch Sept 28th 2012: many more new fixes + SU-26, CoD is starting to look good
[Re: Brigstock]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 831
rootango
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 831
everywhere
|
Here's a FM fix for you The new patch has porked the RAF aircraft. Can't start any of them from cold. (ie when on line) It seems only the Spit 2a will start. It's been reported on the banana forum. Looks like the A/C are too cold for the Glycol to kick in. Rolling back to the previous beta...... and here is a solution for you Bug: Hurricane engine temps too cold for engine start up.
Hurricane MkI 100 Oct: oil temp starts at around 16'C (although one trial oil was 12'C on spawn), engine wont start until 20-21'C. Method for starting engine was spamming ignition until temps reached 20-21'C oil, 40'C water. Radiator was closed; mixture auto rich; prop 100% (tried different % but made no difference); throttle 15% (again tried different settings, 15% worked well once temps got to near 20'C as prop would spin for longer). the real question is of course, did/do these aircraft have the same issue with colder engines or not ? is suspect not, BUT a rather interesting observation about the complexity of the engine modeling is that activating/using one part (ignition) has a direct effect on another (engine temp) which then allows the aircraft engine to be started still, it doesnt actually prevent gameplay either, so just think of your flying day as beeing an exceptionally cold day during a long BoB summer and here are some of the good things people are starting to report: new nicer colors and better color tones for scenery and some objects, great visibility to the horizon with very distant landmass/sea, smooth gameplay with no more (? less) sudden drop in fpsec, ghost dot problem solved, etc.
Be advised, we got zips in the wire
|
|
#3652856 - 09/29/12 05:01 AM
Re: new RC patch Sept 28th 2012: many more new fixes + SU-26, CoD is starting to look good
[Re: rootango]
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,744
HeinKill
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,744
Cloud based
|
I dont jump into new patches, so here is what I gather from sukhoi and 1C...
RAF aircraft speeds corrected for low alt...RAF can dogfight again. This is a big positive.
Even smoother rendering, fps, no stuttering.
Light clouds are back, but cloud shadows not consistent and objects visible through clouds.
People are having fun with the Su26 and its weird weapons (for them, I recommend War Thunder!). They need to be enabled in FMB tho and there may be a landing taxi issue.
Engine startup issue on most RAF types. Time to warm up engine sufficiently to start Hurricanes - 9 mins! Return of a bug from a previous patch. This is a big backward step.
Couple of report of strange effects from the winder weapons on the Su26, including aircraft still able to fly despite missing half the airframe after being hit.
Machines without fuel, or with engines destroyed able to auto taxi to hangars.
So...as with many a patch, one step forward, two back.
|
|
#3652900 - 09/29/12 07:26 AM
Re: new RC patch Sept 28th 2012: many more new fixes + SU-26, CoD is starting to look good
[Re: HeinKill]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 831
rootango
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 831
everywhere
|
So...as with many a patch, one step forward, two back.
i would call it 3 steps forward and 1 step back the main issue, more fluid gameplay and much less major sudden drops in fpsec over cities or near other aircraft formations, further improvements in scenery and gfx engine, FM fixes for allied fighters, Visually sharper cockpits and scenery/objects, turning on the grass is significantly less demanding on cpu/gpu, clouds have shadows again, no more ghost planes, The Spitfire Ia and IIa are now quite competitive against the 109 online (as should have been the case) there are a few new annoying glitches, like the 1/2 aircraft only showing when some less severe damage occurred in that plane section, the startup problems for cold engines on the spitfire and hurricanes, and a few others the new issues seem specific technical bugs that are relatively easy to sort out, the gameplay and scenery improvements are the big +++'s to me the big one i am waiting for is to see if netcode and AI control improved, those are big issues for players and wil significantly determine if people return to the game after trying previous patches. also remember this is a RC beta patch, to be tested and for us to provide feedback on (while we get to enjoy an early version of the patch)
Be advised, we got zips in the wire
|
|
#3652921 - 09/29/12 09:15 AM
Re: new RC patch Sept 28th 2012: many more new fixes + SU-26, CoD is starting to look good
[Re: rootango]
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,194
EAF_92 Whiskey
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,194
Suffolk, UK
|
They manage to feck up the engine starts yet give us an aircraft that has no place any where near the BoB. Surely they'd have better spent the time fixing the game rather than giving us the Su26!? Not many things bother me these days but this patch has really p1ssed me off. [/rant] WB.
I'm Spartacus.
|
|
#3652927 - 09/29/12 09:56 AM
Re: new RC patch Sept 28th 2012: many more new fixes + SU-26, CoD is starting to look good
[Re: rootango]
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 858
sharpe26
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 858
Maastricht, Holland
|
I guess I'm therefore not the only one that has a weird feeling about this patch...
I'm a crappy pilot, but one hell of a shot.
|
|
#3653065 - 09/29/12 03:30 PM
Re: new RC patch Sept 28th 2012: many more new fixes + SU-26, CoD is starting to look good
[Re: EAF_92 Whiskey]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 831
rootango
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 831
everywhere
|
They manage to feck up the engine starts yet give us an aircraft that has no place any where near the BoB. Surely they'd have better spent the time fixing the game rather than giving us the Su26!? the Su-26 was already nearly finished when the original CoD was released, its not a "new" aircraft that has just been created. it was also intended to be in the original CoD release (had been stated so during development), so it is more a case of 1C meeting their obligation or promises rather then going of on another tangent and not being aware there are other problems.there are a significant number of old il2 users who are eagerly awaiting it for aerobatic use. with the cold start problem, all i can say is that it is a beta patch, and errors slip in. on the plus side, there are many new fixes and improvements, and hopeful they will release a micro-patch just to solve the immediate problem with the cold start issue personally i am more concerned to see if the long awaited FM issues for the hurricane and spitfire mk1 are addressed (speed and climb issues at various altitudes). not all facts are in yet (its been 24 hrs), but low altitude problems seem to have been addressed to a significant degree, but new high/mid altitude issues are now present (major problems climbing above 3km it seems). the next few days/week will flesh that issue out. the MAIN good news with this patch is the continued gfx engine performance improvements i mentioned a couple of posts back, and the more fluid gameplay. since that was the main problem with the original release, the last few patched seem to confirm they have made major progress on this, and the game now has become playable for a large number of people on mid level systems, and i think other issues should now be possible to address more easily and more effectively (for ex in the latest patch, with the further improved grafix, there is now better visibility of distant aircraft, and they are easier to spot and track (which was extremely bad and unrealistic before)
Be advised, we got zips in the wire
|
|
#3653320 - 09/30/12 02:37 AM
Re: new RC patch Sept 28th 2012: many more new fixes + SU-26, CoD is starting to look good
[Re: rootango]
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 427
TychosElk
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 427
|
|
|
#3653347 - 09/30/12 05:23 AM
Re: new RC patch Sept 28th 2012: many more new fixes + SU-26, CoD is starting to look good
[Re: HeinKill]
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 811
commorange
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 811
Troy, OH
|
Engine startup issue as described above. Time to warm up engine sufficiently to start Hurricanes - 9 mins! Return of a bug from a previous patch. This is a big backward step.
This isnt going to make Keith Park happy. He wanted them airborn in two minutes didn't he?
my system: Intel Core I7 920 @ 3570ghz Asus P6T MB 6 GB OCZ DDR3 RAM , dram freq 680 mhz, NB freq 2720 mhz Radeon HD 4870 w/ 1 Gb vram OS.. Windows 7 professional 64 bit WD 2 TB hard disk drive etc.
|
|
#3653365 - 09/30/12 06:54 AM
Re: new RC patch Sept 28th 2012: many more new fixes + SU-26, CoD is starting to look good
[Re: TychosElk]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,271
Sluggish Controls
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,271
Hong Kong
|
Yup, I can confirm there is no grass in the hangers: Next time, I'm going to see if I can do it inverted. Show-off. You're taxiing Cheers, Slug
"Major Burns isn't saying much of anything, Sir. I think he's formulating the answer..." - Radar - M*A*S*H
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|