#3433454 - 11/14/11 04:07 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 12
Broncq
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 12
|
The Hawk system, not on the doable list? Now, that woulld be a neat system to simulate. I assume that it's performance would be similar to that of the SA-3.
|
|
#3433494 - 11/14/11 05:30 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 54
arkhangelsk
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 54
|
- Measured Complete System Initialization Procedure Does this mean, I get to press buttons and see the hydraulic pressure of my missile launchers rise? If yes, I vote for this further increased realism as the next developmental direction.
|
|
#3433551 - 11/14/11 08:56 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hpasp
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hungary, Europe
|
The Hawk system, not on the doable list? Now, that woulld be a neat system to simulate. I assume that it's performance would be similar to that of the SA-3.I never seen any Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. HAWK documents. (In fact, I never seen any documents about the HAWK.) I assume, that its performance is closer to the KUB (SA-6). Does this mean, I get to press buttons and see the hydraulic pressure of my missile launchers rise? If yes, I vote for this further increased realism as the next developmental direction. It would mean performing the system startup pre-checks, after system switch on, against the time. (Using many more buttons, and switches on the Volhov panel, unused currently) Hydraulic pressure of my missile launchers rise is not included in this. The voting is not started yet, just doing a brainstorming with You.
|
|
#3433572 - 11/14/11 10:40 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 54
arkhangelsk
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 54
|
It would mean performing the system startup pre-checks, after system switch on, against the time. (Using many more buttons, and switches on the Volhov panel, unused currently) Close enough. I'll plug my vote early.
|
|
#3433722 - 11/14/11 04:04 PM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
piston79
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
|
Results from math modeling and real practice с75 от&...amp;#1074;.djvu, for C-75M3. Interesting results... Obviously the best (so far) method that I found to escape from 5Ya23 and -750;755 is "kabrirane" (loft) with 8 g (Kill possibility with 1 missile - 0.2!!!). Against targets with maximum parameter - fragments hits with 0-15 degrees and often only "scratch" the target... Shooting in "Dogon" - fuse detects the tail of target, and fragments hits tail, so no important components are destroyed, so must use more than 1 missile.
Last edited by piston79; 11/15/11 08:40 AM.
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|