#3411078 - 10/16/11 12:33 AM
New SE5a is Awful!
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 149
totalspoon
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 149
Australia
|
Hi Gents,
I finally had a Saturday to blow on Rise of Flight and had a play with the revised version of my beloved SE5a. It's Bloody Awful!
Take five ace SE5a's (no bombs) up against 5 ace Albatros's (any variant, even the 160hp Albatros D.II early) at 100 meters in the quick mission builder. If you try to turn with the albatros, without a pre-existing energy advantage, you'll soon find being out turned and out climbed and in a world of hurt. You can win but it's a hard fight
Now swap over, take five ace Albatros's up against 5 ace SE5a's (no bombs). You'll find you have to cut power to 50% to avoid overtaking the lumbering SE's in a turn as you sit effortlessly on their tails pumping rounds. It's an easy fight.
Against the Pfalz D.III, it's even worse.
Now I'm willing to bet that no one can show me a quote from pilots on either side saying how the Albatros and Pfalz dominated the SE5a. In reality, the SE5a wasn't even out classed by the Fokker D.VIIf;
Marshal of the Royal Air Force William Sholto Douglas, said " Just before the deaths if Jimmy McCudden and Mick Mannock, the Germans had started introducing on the Western Front a new fighter, the Fokker DVII, a single-seater biplane fitted with a new BMW engine - which was one of the best aero engines produced by either side up to that time. Fortunately for us, one of these new Fokkers was captured intact not long after it first appeared, and we were able to try it out against our own SE5. I was one of those who flew it, and we found that our own machine was a shade faster in level flight by about two or three miles per hour, but did not have such a good rate of climb. The Fokker DVII was also slightly more manourvreable than the SE5, but we still had the advantage in being able to pick up speed more quickly in the dive."
If we do some quick calc's (all data from the outstanding Profile Publications), we see the SE5a has a better powerloading and lower wingloading than both Albatros and Pfalz
Albatros D.III Late Powerloading .203 hp/kg (180hp/886kg) Wingloading 43kg/m2 (886kg/20.5m2)
Albatros D.V Powerloading .211 hp/kg (180hp/852kg) Wingloading 40kg/m2 (852kg/21.2m2)
Pfalz D.III Powerloading .197hp/kg (180hp/915kg) Wingloading 41kg/m2 (915kg/22.17m2)
SE5a (Viper) Powerloading .228hp/kg (200hp/879kg) Wingloading 38kg/m2 (879kg/22.84m2)
The only thing the SE5a can do now in ROF is run.
(P.S. I haven't posted this on the ROF forums because from past experience, all you get is endless personal attacks that you dared to question Neoqb)
Spoon
|
|
#3411091 - 10/16/11 12:55 AM
Re: New SE5a is Awful!
[Re: totalspoon]
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,093
Teddy Bär
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,093
|
Hi Spoon,
I believe the SE5a is currently at a disadvantage as the other aircraft are yet to be revised and they, both allied and German, are over modelled. The worst 2 are the Camel and the DR1 and I hope these are the 1st to be revisited by 777.
I am not expert, I am not even a good pilot, but the new SE5a resonates better with me in that I have always thought that the RoF planes were too WWII like in their ability.
Cheers,
Teddy Bär
One of the stupidest things in game design is the lack of uncertainty given to the player
"beatings will continue until morale improves" brought to you by Ubisoft DRM!
|
|
#3411196 - 10/16/11 05:32 AM
Re: New SE5a is Awful!
[Re: totalspoon]
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,092
HotTom
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,092
Phoenix, AZ, USA
|
If you're flying off line, use Criquet's AI Mod and fly Mods On. The SE (and other BnZ planes) will extend properly.
The stock BnZ AI try to turn and get killed very easily.
Exceptional engineering...and a large hammer to make it fit!
|
|
#3411214 - 10/16/11 07:24 AM
Re: New SE5a is Awful!
[Re: totalspoon]
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,147
Gambit21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,147
Pacific Northwest
|
The present ROF SE5a is defenceless once you reach energy parity and your forced to disengage. If you fly the SE5a vs Albatros, then an Albatros vs SE5a, historically you would feel the SE5a was the better machine. In ROF, I'd take the Albatros any day
Thanks
Spoon
That's my impression exactly so far, after just a few hours playing with it in some quick missions against DVII's. Forget slightly inferior turn rate, I can't even come close. Reminds me of flying Wildcats against Zekes in IL2. Of course I'm still shaking off the rust and getting used to RoF, but my impression was exactly as stated above.
Last edited by Gambit21; 10/16/11 09:48 PM.
|
|
#3411243 - 10/16/11 09:32 AM
Re: New SE5a is Awful!
[Re: totalspoon]
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 587
MIG77
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 587
Finland
|
If we do some quick calc's (all data from the outstanding Profile Publications), we see the SE5a has a better powerloading and lower wingloading than both Albatros and Pfalz I would have tought that in this point, people actually would have already undestood also importance of wingprofile, stagger, gap/chord ratio and why sesquiplane desing had adventages in lift efficiency. Listing just wingloading and powerloading can be very misleading... I dont even want to touch question about using only selected anecdotes as a proof...
You can get used to everything, but icicle in the a**. It melts before you get used to it.
|
|
#3411268 - 10/16/11 11:29 AM
Re: New SE5a is Awful!
[Re: totalspoon]
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 302
Borsch
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 302
|
AI vs AI is a pointless test because AI will ALWAYS turn and burn and does not know how to boom and zoom. With proper tactics (" seldom same alt, always above, never below"), the SEVa can completely dictate the way battle goes against any Albatroses, even when outnumbered by them. and yes, using anecdotes as proof doesnt cut it in RoF since 2009 See this thread and marvel at the work that was put into SEVa revision: http://riseofflight.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=351&t=22802The revised SEVa is realistic, historically accurate and meticulously researched and modeled.
Last edited by Borsch; 10/16/11 11:32 AM.
|
|
#3411272 - 10/16/11 11:52 AM
Re: New SE5a is Awful!
[Re: HotTom]
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Point Blank
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
|
If you're flying off line, use Criquet's AI Mod and fly Mods On. The SE (and other BnZ planes) will extend properly.
The stock BnZ AI try to turn and get killed very easily. Definitely, this helps a lot.
|
|
#3411319 - 10/16/11 02:32 PM
Re: New SE5a is Awful!
[Re: totalspoon]
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,426
Wodin
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,426
Liverpool
|
I feel these crates are being compared to WW2 birds and later. We read, say, the SE5a was great at BnZ however this term doesn't mean it's only good at BnZ. The SE5a and some other aircraft could do both, thats what was special about SE5a and why they became ace makers.
Our conceptions are mainly to do with WW2 planes and later as I said and a BnZ plane was great at BnZ but not a turn fighter. With WW1 planes this isn't the case. The SE5a should out fly many others be it turn or boom and zoom. It just so happens it wasn't just good at turning but diving and climbing aswell. We are boxing them into tiny compartments I feel and it doesn't work.
The SE5a in RoF at presnt does not feel like a ace maker nor one of the best planes inWW1. I'd take and Alb DVa any day or a Pflaz DIII.
In other sims the SE5a and the Brisfit are my favourite allied planes. In RoF I barely fly them. I just bought the Brisfit aswell, it didn't live up to my expectations, the speed drop off when you try and lift the nose off the horizon means it's a terrible climber for a start. Also the rear gunner may aswell not be there. I javen't seen them hit as plane yet even when I'm flying perfectly straight.
Last edited by Wodin; 10/16/11 02:34 PM.
|
|
#3411338 - 10/16/11 03:24 PM
Re: New SE5a is Awful!
[Re: totalspoon]
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 839
Laser
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 839
|
Should SE5a fly like in other sims? If i was used to Red Baron 3D, it means that here it should fly the same? Why? Is the FM of an older sim a reference? If i compare with some pilot account, am i better than that pilot, or how do i know which was the level of his enemies? The thread of SE5a FM correction, was it read by any of the complainers here, before they started to post? Sorry for the tone, but the title of the thread is in the same mood.
In multiplayer RoF, there are a lot of SE5a aces, and those good at flying SE5a before, online, were more than satisfied with the new corrections (diving etc.). It is an ace maker, for those who want to learn how to fly the machine, not to have a machine who fly like they already want. What i see here is people who do not want to fly by BnZ, they want to TnB and still have success, and invoking a lot of strange reasons for that.
( Reading the first post, more and more i see people who don't want to complain at the original forums, exactly because there know their complains are not quite valid and they will quickly get their answer. So instead they move here, and *sometimes* it looks like the SimHQ RoF forum becomes the 'second wave forum', a place to complain, like some weeks ago. )
|
|
#3411340 - 10/16/11 03:34 PM
Re: New SE5a is Awful!
[Re: Laser]
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 615
RoFfan
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 615
|
( Reading the first post, more and more i see people who don't want to complain at the original forums, exactly because there know their complains are not quite valid and they will quickly get their answer. So instead they move here, and *sometimes* it looks like the SimHQ RoF forum becomes the 'second wave forum', a place to complain, like some weeks ago. ) Or look at the post directly above yours. The part about the F2B not climbing well is a howler.
|
|
#3411346 - 10/16/11 03:41 PM
Re: New SE5a is Awful!
[Re: Django333]
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,827
Mace71
Dread pirate Mace
|
Dread pirate Mace
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,827
Darlington, UK.
|
Don't try to turn with them, BnZ. If I BnZ I loose my wings lol
Antec 902 | Intel i7 920 2.66Ghz OC'd to 3.40GHz | MSI GeForce GTX 660 Black Knight 2048MB GDDR5 | Corsair 6GB DDR3 | Coolermaster V8 CPU Cooler | W7 64
"There is only one way to avoid criticism: do nothing, say nothing and be nothing." Aristotle
|
|
#3411523 - 10/16/11 09:37 PM
Re: New SE5a is Awful!
[Re: Mace71]
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,343
Copterdrvr
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,343
Lafayette, LA. USA
|
Don't try to turn with them, BnZ. If I BnZ I loose my wings lol Dude, you are SERIOUSLY doing something wrong!!!! I'm currently flying mid-career in my trusty Se5. My primary opponents are the DV's, DIII's and Pfalz DIII's and the obligatory DFW. Except for the DFW's (which I ALWAYS attack from below), the other aircraft are easy pickings if I fly my SE5 properly. I NEVER engage the fighters unless I have the height advantage and if I start the fight that way, I do very well. I fly with full real except for a few viewing icons ( I don't see as well as I used to!!!) and I average 3 to 5 FIGHTERS a mission with real damage and real ammo. I generally come home without a scratch and almost always, no ammo. In fact, it's the running out of ammo that makes me head for home. I think the Boche hate my bird-for now... If you fly the aircraft to its potential, the above named aircraft cannot touch you. Your success is totally based on your knowledge of the SE-5's flight characteristics and using them to your advantage. I love my SE5-for now!
Skids are for kids!
|
|
#3411847 - 10/17/11 09:17 AM
Re: New SE5a is Awful!
[Re: totalspoon]
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 224
Kwiatek
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 224
|
The point is that SE5a was good B&Z plane but was not bad IRL also as turn and burn one. At least it shouldn't be drastically worse then contemporary German planes like Albatros or Pfalz or even DVII. Actually in ROF only tactic is use huge alt adventage over opponent and make a few passes if you miss you could only run away. You cannot fight in equal terms beacuse you dont have any chance. I think something is not right here. Or some German planes are too good ( and too easy to fly and fight) or new Se5a is not as good as it should be. Now i feel it is like Olegs crapped Fw 190 A-4 against Spitfires MkVb in IL2.
Last edited by Kwiatek; 10/17/11 10:34 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|