#3271772 - 04/16/11 05:23 PM
(SSAO) Screen Space Ambient Occlusion?
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,939
Scoobe
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,939
|
What does this do? It say screen space abient occlusion, but I can not really tell whats its doing?
Rob
Intel Core i7-3770K GB (4 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 2000 (PC3 16000) MSI GTX 960 GTX 4GB
|
|
#3271791 - 04/16/11 06:10 PM
Re: (SSAO) Screen Space Ambient Occlusion?
[Re: Scoobe]
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,939
Scoobe
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,939
|
OK cool, Thanks for the detail explanation. Never heard of it before.
Rob
Intel Core i7-3770K GB (4 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 2000 (PC3 16000) MSI GTX 960 GTX 4GB
|
|
#3271832 - 04/16/11 07:22 PM
Re: (SSAO) Screen Space Ambient Occlusion?
[Re: Scoobe]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 939
RocketDog
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 939
Bath, England
|
Maybe not the best examples, but... The shading is a bit nicer with it on, but on my rig (i7 920 @ 3.8 GHz, GTX285, Wi 7) the difference is hard to notice when actually playing and it costs an awful lot of FPS. I have turned it off . 86 FPS with SSAO off: 54 FPS with it on
Beyond gliding distance
|
|
#3271837 - 04/16/11 07:39 PM
Re: (SSAO) Screen Space Ambient Occlusion?
[Re: RocketDog]
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,737
FearlessFrog
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,737
|
Here is a mathematical difference between the before and after SSAO comparison shots. Note that the 'yellow' in the bottom right is the frames counter difference. Science shows there is actually no difference whatsoever, apart from about 30 frames per second. Now, normally SSAO is subtle, but it's not that subtle. My guess is that the test is broke or that (more likely) the SSAO rendering in COD is not working at all (apart from impacting performance on cards that don't have the feature. Maybe it's a horizon effect, i.e. try a different angle shot with a longer focal length.
|
|
#3271845 - 04/16/11 07:50 PM
Re: (SSAO) Screen Space Ambient Occlusion?
[Re: Scoobe]
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 421
_michal
poly pusher
|
poly pusher
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 421
Poland
|
|
|
#3271851 - 04/16/11 08:01 PM
Re: (SSAO) Screen Space Ambient Occlusion?
[Re: _michal]
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,737
FearlessFrog
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,737
|
@empeck, Again, I've run those images through an analytics comparison tool and (I've only done the moth) and they are exactly the same. The SSAO goggles do nothing. PS I could post a solid rectangle of black showing not one pixel difference between the before/after's but thought not much point. Hmm, I wonder how many placebo comparisons are happening - people are odd that way...
|
|
#3271853 - 04/16/11 08:05 PM
Re: (SSAO) Screen Space Ambient Occlusion?
[Re: Scoobe]
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,737
FearlessFrog
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,737
|
Actually there is a difference, but it's very small in that the difference was so low the 'dark black' on 'darker black' makes it hard to see. If you look real (real) close you can see the yellow underbelly of the moth (just above where the lower wing joins) has a darker shadow. It helps to use a 'swipe' style tool, as that helped me spot it. Man, that's subtle.. (Edit: attached a 'swipe' where the red box highlights the difference on the left/right of vertical line is image 1 / 2)
Last edited by FearlessFrog; 04/16/11 08:09 PM.
|
|
#3271903 - 04/16/11 09:28 PM
Re: (SSAO) Screen Space Ambient Occlusion?
[Re: Scoobe]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 939
RocketDog
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 939
Bath, England
|
Yep - if I switch backwards and forwards between the two Defiant screenshots (at full size) I can see small differences. On the two I posted, it's harder to spot because of the reduced size, but if you look at the insides of the cockpit and turret you can see it's darker with SSAO on and also the wing root is a touch darker. I actually rather like the effect, but as implemented in ColD it is so very subtle as to be scarecely noticeable and is definitely not worth > 30% of my FPS.
Beyond gliding distance
|
|
#3272268 - 04/17/11 12:19 PM
Re: (SSAO) Screen Space Ambient Occlusion?
[Re: Scoobe]
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 314
nats
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 314
Pocklington UK
|
Its a complete waste of processing power.
"It's life, Jim, but not as we know it!"
AMD Phenom II X6 (6x2.8Ghz Six Core) 12GB DDR3 RAM Nvidea Ti550 1Gb Graphics Card MS Sidewinder Forcefeedback 2 Joystick Windows 10 64bit
Games that I am playing: Elite: Dangerous Making History: The Great War Strike Fighters II: Europe Hearts of Iron 3 Fallout 4 Waterloo
|
|
#3273095 - 04/18/11 02:56 PM
Re: (SSAO) Screen Space Ambient Occlusion?
[Re: Scoobe]
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Jedi Master
Entil'zha
|
Entil'zha
Sierra Hotel
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Space Coast, USA
|
Wow, that's a lot of extra power for a whole lotta nothing in the looks department.
SSAO really appears to have no place in a pure flight sim like this.
The Jedi Master
The anteater is wearing the bagel because he's a reindeer princess. -- my 4 yr old daughter
|
|
#3273112 - 04/18/11 03:15 PM
Re: (SSAO) Screen Space Ambient Occlusion?
[Re: Scoobe]
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 25,138
RSColonel_131st
Lifer
|
Lifer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 25,138
Vienna, 2nd rock left.
|
As a photographer, maybe I can explain SSAO in a different way, and explain what it SHOULD be doing (not that people here haven't done a good job).
Basically, SSAO as I understand it takes into account the natural real world effect that there is usually "ambient" light playing a part in what we see. As in, the interior of your car is not only lit by direct sun light coming trough the window (and everything not in the sun would be pitch black) but actually your car's "not in the sun" part are lit by reflections of sunlight coming from other surfaces and from "stray light" for example caused by a cloud or by other refraction, rough surfaces and so on. When you start working with precisely defined light sources (as I do for a picture) you really are initially surprised how much light hits an object "roundabout" even though you have no direct ray going from the bulb to the surface.
So even with an theoretically idealistic single light source (a pin-point small sun) surfaces not touched by direct light are never fully dark in our real world, if the primary light is powerful.
What SSAO does is to calculate the amount of geometry around a given 3d plane. You can see that good on Empeck's top two footwell shots from the cockpit interior. The metal deep inside the footwell has less chance of being caught by "stray rays" so it is notable darker when using SSAO. Actually SSAO likely works the other way round, brightening everything up that has a chance of being lit by "stray rays".
The problem here seems to be that the outside of an aircraft, smooth shapes and all, is particularly bad at causing ambient light occlusion. So the effect - even in reality - is just not very much present there. It still costs the same amount to compute though.
|
|
|
|