#3195590 - 02/01/11 07:02 PM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov qualification day
[Re: vintorez]
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hpasp
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hungary, Europe
|
on A screen: the black one with "C" (up) and "R" (down). I can see some effect on the display, but I don't understand it.
One of the early phases of the Vietnam War, US was jamming the missile beacon channel. For a few months, all launched missile were lost. The missiles were field modified to the V-750VM standard, that effectively made this type of jamming method obsolete.
That switch is from this time.
Before transmission and missile launch, switching this switch to "R" (Missile) you can see, if the enemy is jamming the missile tracking frequency. Switching this witch to "C" (Target) you can see, if the enemy is jamming the target tracking frequency. In the middle "standard" state, we can see both the missile, and the target tracking frequency channels.
Last edited by Hpasp; 02/01/11 07:06 PM.
|
|
#3197104 - 02/03/11 07:01 AM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov qualification day
[Re: PLCC]
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hpasp
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hungary, Europe
|
In the current version not. Before the "other SAMs into the SIM" fewer, one development possibility was to stick with the S-75M3 Volhov only, and integrate the NASA digital elevation map (SRTM) into the program. If it would happened, there would have been realistic ground clutter displayed, and SDC (MTI) would be realistically modeled.
|
|
#3197183 - 02/03/11 12:03 PM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov qualification day
[Re: NaiseFail]
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hpasp
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hungary, Europe
|
Some good news... ... the next version of the SAM Simulator will be released before the end of this weekend. 163. ZRBR, Loburg, DDR
Last edited by Hpasp; 02/03/11 01:25 PM.
|
|
#3198189 - 02/04/11 08:07 AM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov qualification day
[Re: NaiseFail]
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hpasp
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hungary, Europe
|
I would be interested in Your opinion about the possible SAMSIM development paths... 1, Add ZSU-23-4V1 Shilka, with the 1986 El Dorado Canyon, and some War of Attrition scenarios. 2, Add SA-75MK Dvina with realistic Vietnam and War of Attrition scenarios. 3, Add the NASA Digital Elevation Model, to have realistic ground clutter. Each of the above options would take around a year of development...
Last edited by Hpasp; 02/04/11 08:08 AM.
|
|
#3198282 - 02/04/11 12:43 PM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov qualification day
[Re: NaiseFail]
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 58
Redcoalition
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 58
Brazil
|
Something i would preffer first than the development of the Shilka: Increase S-75M3 complexity + advanced manual. That would made me very happy
Last edited by Redcoalition; 02/04/11 12:47 PM.
|
|
#3198489 - 02/04/11 04:00 PM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov qualification day
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 54
arkhangelsk
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 54
|
I would be interested in Your opinion about the possible SAMSIM development paths... 1, Add ZSU-23-4V1 Shilka, with the 1986 El Dorado Canyon, and some War of Attrition scenarios. 2, Add SA-75MK Dvina with realistic Vietnam and War of Attrition scenarios. 3, Add the NASA Digital Elevation Model, to have realistic ground clutter. Each of the above options would take around a year of development... Actually, first, as soon as the S-200 comes out (please don't say you found some last minute bug and so it'll be next week or something), write out the Advanced Manual - it is IMO quite un-nerving to have all those undefined clickable buttons. Then do 3 then 1. Don't worry too much about 2 (really, I'm sure that we can be given the small handicap of using an advanced SAM model)
|
|
#3198995 - 02/05/11 12:16 AM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov qualification day
[Re: NaiseFail]
|
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 7,747
Ssnake
Virtual Shiva Beast
|
Virtual Shiva Beast
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 7,747
Germoney
|
I think it'd be very cool to see this linked with SB Pro PE! If you haven't already, you should make that same offer to DCS, Ssnake. With virtual simulations that both render 3D environments it is a lot more challenging to do, actually. As long as you only have to coordinate the radar of the terrain profile with that of the virtual exterior, this is much, much easier. The user doesn't experience a discrepancy in the representation of the virtual environment, so you don't have to implement methods for terrain correlation other than the height profile, which is almost trivial (once that both simulations can access the same base data like DTED files). You then only need to exchange unit positions and handle the weapons effects; not entirely trivial, but certainly manageable.
|
|
#3199316 - 02/05/11 01:38 PM
Re: S-75M3 Volhov qualification day
[Re: NaiseFail]
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 19
Vulture
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|