Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#3132451 - 11/07/10 01:38 PM A word about the missions and campaign?  
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,507
Ripcord Offline
Member
Ripcord  Offline
Member

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,507
Houston, Texas
From the Aerosoft press release....

Quote:
Because Jet Thunder: Falklands/Malvinas Conflict is a large and complex project it will be release in three 'stages' where each stage builds upon the feedback from customers and adds more features. The first two products will be digital download only, while the last (and final) version will be available in download and worldwide in boxed form. Splitting the project in stages also will enable us to gradually increase the complexity of systems and introduce this generation of jets to customers who have never flown combat flight simulators.

The first release (Jet Thunder: Royal Air Force Harrier) will include the full Falklands/Malvinas islands as a backdrop for the missions flown with the Royal Air Force 1(F) Squadron's Harrier. Starting from the HMS Hermes the user will have battle the Argentinean fighters in support of the Fleet Air Arm Sea Harriers, defend the British ships from attack, prepare the landing operations and provide close air support for the Royal Marines and Paratroopers. The Harrier is expertly modeled and fully operational. From a 'cold and dark' start, all the way to shut down the systems are as they are in the real aircraft. As far as we know this will be the first time full VTOL procedures will be realistically possible in a simulator. Release is scheduled for late 2010, download only, at a of price 20 (plus VAT when applicable).

In 2011 there will be additions that will add many more flyable aircraft, the Argentinean side, and finally the boxed/download version that combines it all.


Ok so this is the context for the planned release or releases, Dante -- what kind of missions will we have? I understand it will be historically accurate, so that will missions set up to recreate what happened? So how will that look? Will there be a linear campaign, eg, a number of missions strung together in a certain order? Or will that order be semi-dynamic, based on missions events and outcomes? Can we assume there will be some additional 'twists and turns' along the way, in the campaign, contingent on events? Or maybe there will be a stock campaign that strictly historically accurate and another one that has a little more 'artistic license' in terms of a wider range of missions to be flown?

And also, what about a Mission Builder/Editor tool for user-made missions? Will that be available in the first release or in later releases?

I apologize, Dante, if you have answered this somewhere in another interview.

Ripcord


USN/USMC -- when it positively, absolutely has to be blown up overnight.
Inline advert (2nd and 3rd post)

#3132471 - 11/07/10 01:58 PM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Ripcord]  
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,507
Ripcord Offline
Member
Ripcord  Offline
Member

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,507
Houston, Texas

I just saw this SimHQ that Joe did last year with Scary Pidgeon.... that link is here

Part of that interview talks about a Dynamic Campaign

Quote:
Joe: In 2006 you told SimHQ about the dynamic campaign system planned for Jet Thunder. Dynamic campaigns are always a hot-button issue with SimHQ members. Can you give us a current description of the campaign system and tell us what you feel are some of its major strengths?

SP: I think it would be unthinkable to not have some sort of dynamic campaign. Embarrassingly, we dont have the complete design for it yet. We are pondering mainly if there ought to be a sort of RTS running in the background, which might be quite tricky technically. Alternatively, we could use a turn-based approach similar to the Total War strategy game series; this would be turn-based strategy with optional real time resolution, which might be easier. I'm pondering rules of popular board games to see if they are applicable.

We imagine the dynamic campaign will also have a number of "what ifs"; for example, what if Port Stanley runway was extended? The Argentinians chose to fortify the island's ground defenses rather than improve its airfield. Would the option of using Mirages supersonically be a useful edge?


First, I don't think there is anything to be embarrassed about, if you don't have a true dynamic campaign, because nobody else does either, outside of the various flavors of Falcon 4 .

Second, I kinda doubt that this would be feasible in your initial release? Will it make into the final boxed release, or will it be part of some kind of future add-on?

Third, how much of these plans have been changed/modified now that you have a publisher? The focus has to be getting a product out there and getting some cash flow in the door -- that's just reality and nothing wrong with that.

Personally I am good with something like we see in DCS:A10 -- a mission generator and a campaign builder that allows for semi-dynamic campaigns, something with some room to grow and add-on later, but still enables users to generate additional content. I also like the idea of the campaign server for MP and/or maybe some kind of RTS or something running in the background (less enthusiastic here if it sucks up memory).

Please give us an update on where we are at on all this now that we have a publisher and a phase release strategy.

Ripcord







Last edited by Ripcord; 11/07/10 02:01 PM.

USN/USMC -- when it positively, absolutely has to be blown up overnight.
#3132652 - 11/07/10 07:35 PM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Ripcord]  
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 320
Dante-JT Offline
Member
Dante-JT  Offline
Member

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 320
Florianpolis - Brazil
Hi Ripcord!

Having the first release as the RAF Harrier Gr.3, their missions will follow closely the events on Jerry Pook's book. As you may know, it starts half way through the campaign timeline, at May 20, 1982, with the brits on the eve of getting the beach head at San Carlos. It will have a set of missions based on the descriptions (and maps) found in the book. Actually, our programmer scary_pigeon, through the book's editor got Jerry's contact (lets cross our fingers smile

For the second release with the argentinean side and the mainland bases, it will be similar, except it will start on May 1, 1982 with the "baptism of fire" of the argentinean airforce. Regarding the mission data, the argentinean air force has a lot of info, with correct schedules, loadouts, description of events and even waypoint coords for each of their missions.

For the third release, the full boxed release, we'll take a shot at a dynamic campaign like what scary_pigeon mentioned in his interview, and this is huge, costly and complicated, as you may know by the lack of such feature in any other sim outside of Falcon 4, and you're right too, the first two installments are meant to be getting a product out there and getting some cash flow so we can at least have a shot at the dynamic campaign.

Regarding the artistic license regarding a wider range of missions flown, we're pondering about the lack of air-to-air in RAF Harrier missions. Actually, they brought the Gr.3s into the theater to support the Sea Harriers in air combat, because of the numeric advantage of the argentinean air force, the war planners had foresee a huge attrition in the Sea Harrier's force. Those RAF pilots were trained in air-to-air and have fought mock battles against French Mirages and Super Etendard before being dropped in the South Atlantic. They had the AIM-9L too. Perhaps is not too much of an artistic license if some missions calls for supporting the SHARs in CAP duties, even if this didn't happened historically. Or, less of an artistic license, it could had happened, is a flight of RAF Harriers on a mud moving mission got into visual range with a flight of argentinean aircraft - by all accounts, even if both flights were in air-to-ground missions, they would jettison their stores and prepare to self-defense! So, I must mention Jane's F-15 historical campaign of Desert Storm/Iraq 1991: we were intercepted by Iraq MiG-29s half way through the campaign, even knowing that in the real events the Iraq Air Force was blasted out of the skies in the first nights of the conflict. Artistic license! Please give us your opinions on this interesting subject.

P.S.: they actually launched in an intercept mission on May 19 but were unsuccessful and returned to carrier. The first mission were they dropped ordnance with effects on targets was on May 20.


-----
Jet Thunder Project
http://www.thunder-works.com
#3132766 - 11/07/10 11:34 PM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Ripcord]  
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,823
ricnunes Offline
Senior Member
ricnunes  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,823
Portugal
Since you're asking, here are my oppinions:

- It's a petty that you won't include the dynamic campaign in the inicial release. I disagree with Ripcord when he says that "dynamic campaigns are not that important" (not his exact words but that's what he meant - at least that's what I understood) since nowadays every modern combat flight sim only have static campaigns and that's IMO it's a bit frustrating - I miss the dynamic campaigns of "old-day" sims such as Falcon 4, EECH or Longbow 2. I would prefer much more that you delayed the release date of this first release in order to include the dynamic campaign (similary to what Ubisoft did with Silent Hunter 3 few years ago - a move that worked extremelly well, BTW).

- When you announced this Harrier Gr3 inicial release, I had the similar though as you - this would be a much more limited choise since the Harrier Gr3 ended up doing Air-to-Ground missions exclusively (and not Air-to-Air ones) and the Sea Harrier would be a much better choise BUT then I remebered all the A-10 similations that came up in the past and will come up in the future (DCS A-10) - These sims modeling the A-10 were as expected very limited in Air-to-Air combat content but nevertheless were between the most loved modern combat aircraft sims and aircraft modeled and this was IMO partly or even mainly done with the introduction of interesting Air-to-Ground missions (which often involved close air support of friendly troops).
Anyway, I always thought that the Harrier Gr3 back in the 80's was the RAF counterpart to the USAF A-10, even if the Harrier is lighter, less resistant, faster and somehow more agile and STOVL capable when compared to the A-10 even because the mission of both the A-10 and Harrier Gr3 centered around Close Air Support. So this means that a good idea is to look at missions of previous A-10 simulations (such as A-10 tank killer, A-10 Cuba, etc...) for inspiration.

- Regarding a possible dedicated Air-to-Air role/missions for the Harrier Gr3 in Jet Thunder, my oppinion is:
Avoid it! Well I guess there could ocasionally be one or two (top) Air-to-Air missions during the campaign but except for this you should avoid the Air-to-Air missions and the A-10 simulations prove that these type of missions aren't really that needed for a great combat flight sim. Anyway I know that there is always the need for the "rush of Air-to-Air combats" in any combat flight sim so IMO what should be done in Jet Thunder in order to satisfy this "appetite" is using a similar "formula" used in the A-10 sims which basically is - TARGETS OF OPPORTUNITY - In the case of Jet Thunder this could be done by introducing flights of argentinian aircraft such as Pucaras, or helicopters (Pumas, Hueys, Chinooks, Agusta A-109, etc...) or even faster fighter-type aircraft such as the A-4 nearby the player's mission objective areas (and some of this aircraft could be tasked to attack friendly ground/naval units) thus giving the player the decision wether or not to try to engage and kill some of those enemy aircraft as targets of opportunity (and thus saving some friendly ground/naval units in the "end of the day").

#3132866 - 11/08/10 04:13 AM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: ricnunes]  
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 778
Bumfluff Offline
Member
Bumfluff  Offline
Member

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 778
g'day dante. really looking forward to this. it should be fantastic.

any chance of you posting a few more videos to give us a taste of how it will look.

#3132878 - 11/08/10 04:46 AM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Ripcord]  
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 320
Dante-JT Offline
Member
Dante-JT  Offline
Member

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 320
Florianpolis - Brazil
ricnunes: thanks for the input! It's very appreciated.

nick10: yes, it perhaps went under tha radar, but a few days ago our programmer scary_pigeon posted a video showing the AI succeed in landing a Sea Harrier on Hermes deck. This AI is really flying the Harrier in the V/STOL mode without fudges or magic forces pushing it here and there: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yng0_utGRiA


-----
Jet Thunder Project
http://www.thunder-works.com
#3132919 - 11/08/10 08:36 AM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Ripcord]  
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,524
Keithb77 Offline
Member
Keithb77  Offline
Member

Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,524
UK
For me you are doing exactly the right thing by releasing the 1st component as soon as you can (so long as its debugged - though if you need a beta tester I would volunteer).
Personally I rarely have time for campaigns and suspect the only a small percentage of users actually do fly campaigns. attack
Historical missions very important, but the capability for 'what if' missions also very important.
Given that
a, Jerry Pook strongly supported the idea of RAF Harriers flying A2A (no surprise...)
b, The radar on the Sea Harriers was quite variable in performance
c, Many of the Sea Harrier interceptions were eyeballed from CAP or from GCI
there is lots of opportunity to provide A2A.

You haven't mentioned the mission editor ... I think it will be very important to have that capability in the first release to leverage the community enthusiasm to produce content.
Hopefully your mission files are ascii ... I've written a number of complex to simple mission editors in the past (see here ) copter
Cheers
Keith

#3132926 - 11/08/10 09:07 AM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Dante-JT]  
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 778
Bumfluff Offline
Member
Bumfluff  Offline
Member

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 778
whoa. looks difficult. wouldn't want to be doing that when short of fuel.

#3133004 - 11/08/10 02:19 PM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Ripcord]  
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,158
MoonJumper Offline
Member
MoonJumper  Offline
Member

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,158
D-CHOC
Historic missions are important, so that we can try to do "what they have done".
Dodging the intense AAA etc, getting weapons on target.
But I dont mind a 2nd option with lots of artistic licence , to keep things interesting in the long run.. which lets the player
fly the missions in his own style.
Thats includes air combat. ( maybe making it a option , probability of intercept or somehting )

Also, given the circumstances, I dont expect to much from the first part/release. ThunderWorks isnt a big company.
I think that the game will be really enjoyable/good only once its fully finished, with everything build and functional.

#3133066 - 11/08/10 03:57 PM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Keithb77]  
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,823
ricnunes Offline
Senior Member
ricnunes  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,823
Portugal
Originally Posted By: Keithb77
...suspect the only a small percentage of users actually do fly campaigns.


Well I completly disagree and if that really happens which I doubt the only reason is because of the boring nature of a static campaign - IMO, there's no point playing a static campaign (and nowadays every combat flight sim seems to have static campaigns only). IMO it's preferable to play single missions (specially of the sim support user made missions) instead of a static campaign since in single missions you can choose which mission you wish to fly (as opposed to a static campaign).
If you take a closer attention, the vast majority of people play older sims such as Falcon 4, EECH or Over Flanders Fields (even if this last one isn't "that old") because of their dynamic campaigns.

I also have enormous time contraints (for playing games) but IMO the time that requires to play ONE campaign mission is exactly the same or very similar as the time required to play ONE Single mission - The diference is that in a dynamic campaign a mission that you play will somehow affect the next one and this makes all the diference!

#3133368 - 11/09/10 01:02 AM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Ripcord]  
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,507
Ripcord Offline
Member
Ripcord  Offline
Member

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,507
Houston, Texas

Some good answers, Dante, thanks for that.

So no campaign really in the initial releases, just historical missions, did I get that right? Or we might have a linear campaign?

Ripcord


USN/USMC -- when it positively, absolutely has to be blown up overnight.
#3133468 - 11/09/10 05:05 AM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Ripcord]  
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 320
Dante-JT Offline
Member
Dante-JT  Offline
Member

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 320
Florianpolis - Brazil
Ripcord: we might have a linear campaign.


-----
Jet Thunder Project
http://www.thunder-works.com
#3134135 - 11/10/10 02:01 AM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Ripcord]  
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 855
joey45 Offline
Member
joey45  Offline
Member

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 855
London UK
Im all for it... Where do I sign up........


DCS:World Sqd - 159th G.A.R
my pics - Tour
Team VRC - Texture artist
#3234308 - 03/14/11 09:58 PM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Dante-JT]  
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 197
Skoop Offline
Member
Skoop  Offline
Member

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 197
Ventura, CalifornIA
Originally Posted By: Dante-JT
Ripcord: we might have a linear campaign.


You Guys are still gonna try to do a dynamic campaign for the 3rd and final release right ?

That could make or break the sim for alot of people on the fence about this one.

If you need inspiration for a dynamic campaign, check out Battle of Britain WOV. It's dynamic but believably historic as you play it out.

Last edited by Skoop; 03/14/11 09:59 PM.
#3234604 - 03/15/11 04:40 AM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Ripcord]  
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 601
Lemon Offline
Member
Lemon  Offline
Member

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 601
Dante, I think everyone appreciates the difficulty of building a dynamic campaign. Very few sims have tried and fewer have done a great job. Still, of all the bullet point features that's the one I'm most excited about. Makes a world of difference and it's why I still play Falcon and EECH.

Best luck.

#3235818 - 03/16/11 04:45 PM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Ripcord]  
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,859
RSColonel_131st Online biggrin
Lifer
RSColonel_131st  Online Biggrin
Lifer

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,859
Vienna, 2nd rock left.
I think many sims that try for the "dynamic campaign" simple set their sights to high, as for example trying to go Falcon 4.0

If you look at any of Thirdwire's titles you see a simple, actually quite basic campaign design, that gives the player everything he would have in a "real war". It really doesn't have to be much more than that to make a lot of people happy.

#3239681 - 03/20/11 01:41 PM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Ripcord]  
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 850
toonces Offline
Member
toonces  Offline
Member

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 850
Honolulu, Hawaii
Well said Colonel.

The DC in Falcon 4.0 will always be the grail, but Third Wire does a "good enough" job with their version.

Why this hasn't become the industry standard by now I don't understand. It can't be that hard to program.


"A week or even a month for someone basically saying "shucks, this is pants" maybe. But their banhammer only has the forever setting. Gotta set phasers to stun for the localization of female undergarments, not kill yo." - Frederf
#3259003 - 04/04/11 10:05 AM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Ripcord]  
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,859
RSColonel_131st Online biggrin
Lifer
RSColonel_131st  Online Biggrin
Lifer

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,859
Vienna, 2nd rock left.
I actually think TW should license and "code to adapt" for cash his engine to other simulators, to make it an industry standard. It seems simple enough to activate in any game that can track ground object damage and where the AI can do waypoints, not more required than that. All it would need is to map the "ground nodes" that define the vehicle/frontline movement, supply depots and such, and to adapt the mission format to the game specific syntax. But it really does not seem to need any advanced TW specific AI features or such...

#3259578 - 04/04/11 06:55 PM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: RSColonel_131st]  
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,246
Johan217 Offline
Member
Johan217  Offline
Member

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,246
Gent, Belgium
Originally Posted By: RSColonel_131st
I think many sims that try for the "dynamic campaign" simple set their sights to high, as for example trying to go Falcon 4.0

If you look at any of Thirdwire's titles you see a simple, actually quite basic campaign design, that gives the player everything he would have in a "real war". It really doesn't have to be much more than that to make a lot of people happy.
I would be happy if this sim came with a campaign like the TW sims. Having done a bit of modding, I know they may seem pretty basic at first look, but they actually deliver all that is needed: a persistent world, supply and morale tracking for overall forces as well as individual units, strategic priorities and squadron/unit management. Using the right campaign parameters, it is perfectly possible to the actual historical flow of the battle. I'm sure that if this system was presented through a niftier UI (like a more detailed and clickable map), many people would call it hardcore smile

That said, I'm afraid I belong to the "no dynamic campaign, no interest" group. I have tried hard to get into sims such as Lock On, DCS or Kharkov 42... but as much as I appreciate the accurate physics etc, it all feels too restrictive for me.


Undercarriage lever a bit sticky was it, Sir?
#3260408 - 04/05/11 02:01 PM Re: A word about the missions and campaign? [Re: Johan217]  
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,823
ricnunes Offline
Senior Member
ricnunes  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,823
Portugal
Originally Posted By: Johan217
That said, I'm afraid I belong to the "no dynamic campaign, no interest" group. I have tried hard to get into sims such as Lock On, DCS or Kharkov 42... but as much as I appreciate the accurate physics etc, it all feels too restrictive for me.


That's exactly my oppinion!

My sugestion is: if this sim (Jet Thunder) is to be released in "modules" or "betas" (which it will, according to all the info that we have), please don't spend ANY time with linear campaigns. Just work on the dynamic campaign and release a few single missions for the inicial "modules" or "betas". This is my oppinion as a potential customer (I'm only interested and will only buy sims that have or will have dynamic campaign - or similar random generated campaigns such as Strike Fighters).

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RacerGT 

Quick Search
Recent Articles
Support SimHQ

If you shop on Amazon use this Amazon link to support SimHQ
.
Social


Recent Topics
Sinking of the Britannic
by KraziKanuK. 12/07/19 11:31 PM
The Skunk Works
by KraziKanuK. 12/07/19 10:51 PM
Lest We Forget...
by WOLF257. 12/07/19 06:42 AM
There will be no painting in the shed today
by Ajay. 12/07/19 03:47 AM
P 40B
by carrick58. 12/07/19 12:47 AM
I want this this Christmas season.
by NoFlyBoy. 12/06/19 10:35 PM
The Last Full Measure (2020)
by NoFlyBoy. 12/05/19 09:24 PM
Movies that were totally NOT what you were expecting
by PanzerMeyer. 12/05/19 11:46 AM
Got ingrown toenail(s)? I found a MIRACLE
by Zamzow. 12/05/19 01:08 AM
Copyright 1997-2016, SimHQ Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0