Most likely you will send half-strength signal to each display if you simply split it. Supposing you use a passive splitter and it works, it will be a device like this:
Passive Splitter Letterboy - thanks for this. Hmmm it does seem as though it might be an idea just for me to have a projector running from the graphics card - DVI to HDMI and that's it. !
It will mean running the PJ lamp longer, but I won't need a monitor nor one of those expensive Power splitters.!
( I do have another computer for internet and general use, so the PJ is really only for when I'm flying the sims.)
But if the image quality suffers The whole venture is to get better image Quality - 1920 x 1080pHD - so I don't want any image quality suffering thru the power being split.
Then you will have to fork over a little extra. Here is a powered DVI multiplier:
DVI Multiplier
That's a pricey one, Yes it is . Hence my Projector only option.
The exception to the rule here is when video card manufacturers purposely design a card with only one output port but provide a splitter for dual monitor output. In this case, they output enough power from one port for it to work properly.Hmm = As I say, It is a nVidia GTX 280. How do i know if it is such a card as you refer to above?
[i]By the way, I speak from professional experience. I've spent years installing AV equipment in university classrooms. We always used a VGA multiplier to send signal from one port to the monitor and to a ceiling-mounted projector. When you cut the power to the multiplier (thus making it a passive device) you notice the image dim considerably on both displays. At the moment I have a big CRT Monitor ( Got to go, need the room ),and a projector both connected via VGA cables, and I can switch between the two via a switch box, but I'm wanting to upgrade to a 1080pHD projector, which is what this is all about. Thought i'd get a 1920 x 1080 DVI monitor as well, hence the original question, but it seems very expensive to get both running!