#2988095 - 04/02/10 12:38 PM
BoB SoW Update 2 4 10.
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,072
RedToo
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,072
Bolton UK
|
My 'Waiting for Clod' thread: http://tinyurl.com/bqxc9eeAlways take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.Elie Wiesel. Romanian born Jewish writer, professor, political activist, Nobel Laureate, Holocaust survivor. 1928 - 2016. Indeed the safest road to Hell is the gradual one - the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts. C.S. Lewis, 1898 - 1963.
|
|
#2988110 - 04/02/10 01:12 PM
Re: BoB SoW Update 2 4 10.
[Re: RedToo]
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 789
Craterman
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 789
|
|
|
#2988298 - 04/02/10 06:52 PM
Re: BoB SoW Update 2 4 10.
[Re: Chivas]
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,701
Compans
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,701
Bristol VA
|
I want to see 300+ formations and fighters wheeling all over the sky leaving vapour trails! That would be a revolutionary step forward. I agree the models are beautiful but the overall tone is very IL2.
Geforce GT 610
AMD Athlon (tm) IIX3 450 processor
4.00 GB RAM
Win 7 Home premium
|
|
#2988368 - 04/02/10 09:19 PM
Re: BoB SoW Update 2 4 10.
[Re: El Hefe]
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,124
Lancelot
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,124
Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
Well, i think that graphically it looks way way better that IL-2, and much more closer to photorealistic that any combat sim out there. About the overall feeling of the video, i agree it "feels" or "seems" like an improved IL-2, but my question would be: Is that a bad thing?
You guys say its not revolutionary as you expected. Well, what did you expected? What its revolutionary for you?. With this videos we can only "judge" the graphics, and they are hugely better that any version of il2, and also IMO that any of the latest realistic sims out there.
About the clouds and huge bomber formations, obviously we will have to wait more to see if the engine cand handle it. But some of you are judging for what its not being showed and want to see NOW, than what its being really showed.
Si hay que huir, YO PRIMERO!!!
|
|
#2988597 - 04/03/10 09:32 AM
Re: BoB SoW Update 2 4 10.
[Re: El Hefe]
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 70
Cupid Stunt
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 70
Bristol, UK
|
I remember a while ago there were a few videos around from the very talented (I think) Japanese guy who does the CGI stuff, a low level pass by some Mosies, a pair of Japanese fighters coming into land, etc. Which looks almost totally real.
Maybe that is what people are expecting? Of course we would all love that to death but maybe a reality check is in order, it aint gonna be like that yet.
Personally, I think it is looking really nice, the beauty is in the detail, which is easy to overlook in the small scenes we have seen so far. Someone already mentioned how good the shadow of the Do-17 canopy looked on the engine Nacelle, I mean come on that is superb. The clouds, the water reflections, the aircraft surfaces, the people inside the aircraft all look tons better to me. I cant wait for this to come out.
I am just glad Oleg and crew are providing these regular updates, the guy is a genius and to know progress is happening is enough to keep me happy.
Salute Oleg!
|
|
#2988677 - 04/03/10 02:28 PM
Re: BoB SoW Update 2 4 10.
[Re: HeinKill]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,556
Li'lJugs
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,556
St. Cloud MN USA
|
Looks pretty good to me, and remember, it ain't all about graphics.
Hi, I'm Larry and this my brother Dayrle, and this is my other brother Dayrle.
|
|
#2988726 - 04/03/10 04:11 PM
Re: BoB SoW Update 2 4 10.
[Re: Li'lJugs]
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 255
heady89
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 255
Sweden
|
I don't know if i should cry or laugh at the people who claim it looks like IL2.
Not only does it look light years ahead in lightning, models , ploy count , effects, water reflections etc but you've also to consider engine capabilities, features of the game itself , aero dynamics and overall realism.
But sure i don't mind if the crybabys stay in IL2, sure are some nasty nice mods for IL2 but they do not enhance the engine for IL2 anywhere near this , it's just pure bs talk.
Last edited by heady89; 04/03/10 04:12 PM.
Specifications; Intel I7 950 3,1 GHZ 4890 OC 900mhz 1GB DDR5 6084 MB DDR3 PC8200 RAM Saitek X52 , Track IR 5 , F!tality Headset
|
|
#2989172 - 04/04/10 01:38 PM
Re: BoB SoW Update 2 4 10.
[Re: Hackl]
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,712
Dart
Measured in Llamathrusts
|
Measured in Llamathrusts
Lifer
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,712
Alabaster, AL USA
|
I suspect that no matter how good SoW: BoB is, it will be bashed and attacked, particularly by the IL-2 modding crowd.
They'll look at it as competition to their work, which is silly but nonetheless true.
Can we get a pool for when after release the first "don't buy BoB, just download the mods - they're better!" post will be?
The opinions of this poster are largely based on facts and portray a possible version of the actual events. More dumb stuff at http://www.darts-page.comFrom Laser: "The forum is the place where combat (real time) flight simulator fans come to play turn based strategy combat."
|
|
#2989218 - 04/04/10 03:21 PM
Re: BoB SoW Update 2 4 10.
[Re: Dart]
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 87
-Peregrine-
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 87
Johnson City, TN
|
I suspect that no matter how good SoW: BoB is, it will be bashed and attacked, particularly by the IL-2 modding crowd. Some of the guys complaining may just be looking for a reaction from the forum users, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|