#2860878 - 09/15/09 01:10 PM
Video Game Review: The Fall of 'Rise of Flight'
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 14
Darkwing
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 14
Texas, USA
|
|
|
#2860889 - 09/15/09 01:32 PM
Re: Video Game Review: The Fall of 'Rise of Flight'
[Re: Darkwing]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,456
Dunkers
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,456
England
|
Why should we need to read it? I have now and it's a fair review, but, like all the others, extremely subjective - especially in its conclusions. All of the points mentioned have been discussed on this forum ad infinitum; the reviewer offers nothing new to anyone here so, again, why do you think we need to read it? Are you the reviewer? Just curious.
Once upon a time there was dunkelgrun...
|
|
#2860902 - 09/15/09 02:02 PM
Re: Video Game Review: The Fall of 'Rise of Flight'
[Re: Dunkers]
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,187
Damocles
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,187
Inverness Scotland
|
I can't disagree with what the reviewer has to say, except maybe the half star.
However, even with all the niggles, and having to pay for all the planes you want to fly, I still absolutely enjoy playing this game. Not only that, but, bar the developer going bust (always a worry) I have complete faith that the game will get better and better as time goes on.
Like IL2, I reckon it's here for the long haul. If nothing else it seems to be a superb engine on which to build any flying game you could wish for, so I reckon it has a golden future, whether it's with Neoqube or not.
|
|
#2860904 - 09/15/09 02:04 PM
Re: Video Game Review: The Fall of 'Rise of Flight'
[Re: JohnnyBoy]
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 426
FiveDigits
The Grim Squeaker
|
The Grim Squeaker
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 426
Germany
|
Track IR works in full 6 degree DOF (depth of feel).
(emphasis by me) I lol'd.
|
|
#2860913 - 09/15/09 02:21 PM
Re: Video Game Review: The Fall of 'Rise of Flight'
[Re: Feathered_IV]
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,712
Dart
Measured in Llamathrusts
|
Measured in Llamathrusts
Lifer
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,712
Alabaster, AL USA
|
I wouldn't say "run screaming" from RoF.
Indeed, almost nothing was said about the positives of the sim.
It's an opinion piece, like all reviews, and there's a lot more goodness to the sim than he's allowing for.
LOL, I wonder if he didn't just read forums and cherry picked complaints in order to write a review...
This was published on the 15th of this month, and he didn't know that four planes come standard now? It's hardly "fair" to say only two planes come with the sim in a review published at this late date. Sloppy work; somebody hasn't done their research, which again leads me to believe the author doesn't actually own the sim.
It's an axe job on the sim.
The opinions of this poster are largely based on facts and portray a possible version of the actual events. More dumb stuff at http://www.darts-page.comFrom Laser: "The forum is the place where combat (real time) flight simulator fans come to play turn based strategy combat."
|
|
#2860967 - 09/15/09 03:25 PM
Re: Video Game Review: The Fall of 'Rise of Flight'
[Re: Darkwing]
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,984
Master
meh
|
meh
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,984
|
Maybe try thinking before you speak (type). It only came with 2 planes! Forty bucks for two stinking planes! Oh sure, if you read the fine print they kind of warn you. I'm paraphrasing here, 'With this game you can fly lots of great old planes like the Fokker D7 and the Spad XIII (and more planes to be released with upcoming patches). What they failed to mention in the fine print is that they are going to charge you the better part of ten bucks per plane and make you wait months and months for them to eek them out . I guess the grumblings from the peanut gallery forced them to give away two extra planes with the first update but still I think this was a pretty low way to launch a game. They'd have been better off releasing the game with all the planes and just charging five or ten dollars a month to play online like World of Warcraft or other such games. He stated several times that they only give two planes and then at the very end he states, oh yea btw there are actually 4 planes the the whole first 90% of my review is a misrepresentation of the facts. Granted he did mention earlier that there were two more planes but he also mentioned earlier that there were only two planes.He does not even mention what those planes were. He completely glosses over the facts because they do not help prove his argument. He gives mixed signals off and on. That is a hatchet job if I ever read one.
|
|
#2860980 - 09/15/09 03:39 PM
Re: Video Game Review: The Fall of 'Rise of Flight'
[Re: Dart]
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,979
Buddye1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,979
South East,Texas,USA
|
Indeed, almost nothing was said about the positives of the sim.
"Here are the pros: This is easily the most beautiful combat flight simulator I have ever seen. The graphics are top shelf and the in-game weather is amazing. The flight model is stable and seems fairly accurate when compared to similar games. There is a master server online that keeps track of things like your kill/death ratio which I think is a wonderful option. You can go from server to server and keep the stats you've built up while flying multi-player. If you have three monitors you can use either a Triple Head to Go box or SoftTH and be able to see the landscape across all three monitors. Track IR works in full 6 degree DOF (depth of feel)." Seems a fair review of ROF but too much rant for a professional review, IMHO.
Last edited by Buddye1; 09/15/09 04:04 PM.
Intel I7 920 processor (2.66GHz, 8MB cache), 6GB DDR3 Triple Channel @1333MHz, 1.8GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295, Sound Blaster X-Fi PCI Sound Card, Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit , CH Fighter Stick & Pedals ,TrackIR4 Pro thanks to BobII crew.
|
|
#2860982 - 09/15/09 03:45 PM
Re: Video Game Review: The Fall of 'Rise of Flight'
[Re: Speyer]
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 587
MIG77
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 587
Finland
|
I got feeling from review that author has agenda in it. He purposebly talks most of review about negative sides (most which are true) and only makes very few words about positives. Example here "The flight model is stable and seems fairly accurate when compared to similar games.", when in fact flight model (or flight engine, you can argue about "correct" data forever) is very, very well done and way above most games in current market.
Misleading (you dont need to buy anything if you dont like or only few) sentences like this: "Their plan obviously being to release a couple of planes every month or so and milk this puppy for all it's worth. Which, when you do the math, comes to around 39.95 + 7.62 x 30 (30 being an estimate on how many planes they plan to release) = $268.00 give or take." only makes you think review motives.
You can get used to everything, but icicle in the a**. It melts before you get used to it.
|
|
#2860984 - 09/15/09 03:46 PM
Re: Video Game Review: The Fall of 'Rise of Flight'
[Re: Buddye1]
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,101
jocko-
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,101
Georgetown, ON Canada
|
Some valid points, but I'd take the reviewer more seriously if he: a) could spell - 'eek' vs. 'eke'. b) had a clue - '6DOF' = depth of feel = WTF? =
Cheers!
jocko-
417 RCAF
|
|
#2861006 - 09/15/09 04:11 PM
Re: Video Game Review: The Fall of 'Rise of Flight'
[Re: Darkwing]
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,771
Para_Bellum
Oberkriegkaboomführer
|
Oberkriegkaboomführer
Hotshot
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,771
Germany
|
I thought it was a rather sub-par review. Not that RoF doesn't deserve criticism in various areas, but to simply slam the game that way and rate it with a "half star out of five" IMO shows that the 'reviewer' certainly did have an axe to grind with RoF. It's pretty obvious that the reviewer is a BIG fan of dogfight servers, something that is in my experience actually of rather low importance for a lot of sim fans.
"...late afternoon the Air Tasking Order came in [and] we found the A-10 part and we said, "We are going where!? We are doing what!?"
Capt. Todd Sheehy, Hog pilot, on receiving orders during Operation Desert Storm
|
|
#2861014 - 09/15/09 04:26 PM
Re: Video Game Review: The Fall of 'Rise of Flight'
[Re: Para_Bellum]
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 213
DD_JoeBob
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 213
Salt Lake City, Utah
|
Agreed Parabellum ... while I can understand the desire of some (perhaps many) of those who fly sims for a dogfight server I also know that many prefer the coop style of play. I also found the review a bit of a hatchet job. But then we old Cess Patrollers have to stick together don't we WH_JoeBob
I'm a Chickenhawk and you're my victim, ya gonna come along quiet or do I gotta muss ya up?
|
|
#2861026 - 09/15/09 04:38 PM
Re: Video Game Review: The Fall of 'Rise of Flight'
[Re: RSColonel_131st]
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,456
Dunkers
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,456
England
|
Bringing our attention to the review at 7.10 a.m. on the day it was published in the blog points to Darkwing and the reviewer being one and the same person. Also, both parties reside in Texas and both share the same opinion, plus there has been no answer to the question of identity. Not 100% conclusive but I rest my case. Christopher Mallard is to Darkwing as Bruce Wayne is to Batman. Thus you should not read this review unless you understand this first - the duplicity of pointing to a self-penned review whilst attempting to pass it off as independent makes the whole exercise worthless. The views expressed are perfectly valid, but belong to a disgruntled individual and do not represent a balanced assessment of Rise of Flight.
Once upon a time there was dunkelgrun...
|
|
|
|