Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
#378496 - 12/27/06 03:12 PM [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet  
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 361
Bright_Sky Offline
Member
Bright_Sky  Offline
Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 361
Quote:
GE completes F414 demonstration
By Guy Norris

General Electric has completed tests of the XTE77/SE2 advanced technology demonstrator engine, which it says validates critical technologies for the F414 Enhanced Durability Engine (EDE) aimed at growth versions of platforms including the Korea Aerospace Industries/Lockheed Martin A-50 and Saab Gripen.

The engine was also the last GE-built demonstrator to run under the US government and industry's Integrated High Performance Turbine Engine Technology (IHPTET) programme, which began in 1988. Since succeeded by the Versatile Affordable Advanced Turbine Engines programme, the effort aimed to more than double turbine engine power-to-weight ratio and reduce specific fuel consumption by 40% over late 1980s-standard engines.

The XTE77/SE2 was used to demonstrate an advanced two-stage, all-blisk (blade and disk) fan and new high-pressure turbine (HPT) design, says GE. "The engine ran to 100% of maximum steady core speed and successfully completed all programme objectives during more than 20h of testing."

In a design similar to its much larger new commercial counterpart, the GEnx, the demonstrator's fan design incorporates three-dimensional-aerodynamic forward-swept aerofoil technology, which GE says provides about 10% higher airflow. The recently completed work builds on rig tests completed in 2005 to verify an advanced, six-stage compressor configuration.

The higher power of the F414 EDE is being offered by GE as a way of either increasing thrust by up to 20% over the current F414-400 engine, or offering "up to three times the life of today's hot section at current thrust levels". Partly funded by the US Navy, the ongoing demonstrator programme also includes research into high-cycle-fatigue reduction technologies, and foreign object damage-tolerant fan and compressor aerofoil designs.

"GE is working with the USN to plan the next phases of testing, which are aimed at further performance and durability improvements through application of next-generation aero and HPT cooling schemes, advanced materials and low-emissions technologies," says the company.

The F414 EDE is likely to compete for future combat aircraft opportunities with the Volvo Aero RM12++ project, as well as potential growth versions of the Eurojet EJ200 and Snecma M88-2. Pratt & Whitney has also studied an IHPTET-derived engine, dubbed the PW7000. This is based on its XTE/XTC-66 demonstrator originally sized as a drop-in replacement for the F414, more than 650 of which have now been delivered for the USN's Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornets.

Here is the link to the article:
http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles/2006/12/19/211144/ge-completes-f414-demonstration.html

Inline advert (2nd and 3rd post)

#378497 - 12/30/06 02:13 AM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet  
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 361
Bright_Sky Offline
Member
Bright_Sky  Offline
Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 361
Another article quoted from GE website:

Quote:
F414 Growth Demonstrator Engine Completes Testing
December 12, 2006 -- LYNN, MASS -- The F414-based advanced technology demonstrator engine, XTE77/SE2, has successfully completed a test program that demonstrated an advanced two-stage, all-blisk (blade and disk) fan and new high-pressure turbine (HPT) design. The engine ran to 100% of maximum steady core speed and successfully completed all program objectives during more than 20 hours of testing.

The new fan design incorporates 3D-aerodynamic forward-swept airfoil technology, which provides approximately 10% higher airflow, improved efficiency and reduced parts count compared with current F414 fans. This second phase of testing builds on work completed in 2005 to verify an advanced, six-stage compressor configuration.

"These demonstrations verify critical F414 Enhanced Durability Engine (EDE) technologies that can deliver added mission capability and lower life cycle cost," said Tony Mathis, F404/F414 general manager at GE Aviation.

GE has tested growth versions of the F414 since 2004. Through application of advanced 3D-aero airfoil designs, low-loss structural frames, and the latest hot-section materials and cooling concepts, the F414 EDE offers up to 20% thrust increase over today's F414-400 engine, or up to three times the life of today`'s hot section at current thrust levels. The ongoing demonstrator program also includes research into high-cycle-fatigue reduction technologies, and foreign object damage-tolerant fan and compressor airfoil designs.

Demonstrator testing was funded jointly by GE and the U.S. Navy (USN) under the U.S. Government Integrated High Performance Engine Technology (IHPTET) program, which targets technologies aimed at increasing thrust-to-weight ratios, reducing fuel burn, and reducing cost of sustainment through time-on-wing and durability improvements. GE is working with the USN to plan the next phases of testing, which are aimed at further performance and durability improvements through application of next-generation aero and HPT cooling schemes, advanced materials, and low-emissions technologies.

The F414 is the powerplant for the dual-engine F/A-18E/F Super Hornet. With more than 500,000 flight-hours, the F414 engine continues to exceed USN reliability goals. The F414-powered F/A-18E/F Super Hornet has expanded its presence in the USN fleet, with 19 active squadrons available for carrier deployment. To date, more than 650 F414 engines have been delivered in support of the USN's plan to purchase engines and spares for 552 twin-engine F/A-18E/F and EA-18G aircraft.

The F414 is also a potential powerplant for growth versions of the Saab Gripen, KAI/LMTAS A-50 light fighter (a derivative of the T-50 advanced trainer), and other combat aircraft under development.

GE Aviation, an operating unit of General Electric Company (NYSE: GE), is one of the world's leading manufacturers of jet engines for civil and military aircraft. GE also is a world-leading provider of maintenance and support services for jet engines.
The link : http://www.geae.com/aboutgeae/presscenter/military/military_20061212.html

#378498 - 12/30/06 03:06 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet  
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,079
Frodo 13 Offline
Hotshot
Frodo 13  Offline
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,079
USA
I hope it passes to get the green light to be in the plane.

#2127329 - 02/01/07 03:06 AM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: Frodo 13]  
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
H-6 Offline
Member
H-6  Offline
Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
Hey Julian, how goes it.
I must say that I also hope they green light this project(I would personally like to work on it)

Just boost the thrust to a 33% increase, and moderat redesign the wing.

Last edited by H-6; 02/01/07 03:06 AM.
#2127660 - 02/01/07 02:43 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: H-6]  
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,079
Frodo 13 Offline
Hotshot
Frodo 13  Offline
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,079
USA
Kind of ironic how this topic comes when I was working on the 18F with the current engine. \:\)

I am sneaking in free time that I have for the jets while work goes on another project.

I need more data on the 'new engines and wing redesign' if I was to model it.

#2127944 - 02/01/07 09:18 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: Frodo 13]  
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
H-6 Offline
Member
H-6  Offline
Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
I would eliminate the saw-tooth design altogether if possible. I forgot if that was for better slow speed handling or increased internal fuel capacity. And see if you could eliminate those canted pylons(they suck). I'm well aware that there's so much you can do.

Now, can there be a 33-40% increase in thrust? That would really raise it's P-rating and give a T:W along the category of the new advanced fighters coming on line. I also know you only have so much space to work with.

I always keep forgetting if this was a future fighter or a stop-gap plane.

#2128477 - 02/02/07 02:33 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: H-6]  
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,079
Frodo 13 Offline
Hotshot
Frodo 13  Offline
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,079
USA
From talking someone that is close to the program, the canted pylons are staying.

I still need to do more investigating on the dog tooth if they are going to remove it.

Thrust is going to be increased by a total of 20% not 40%. This extra power can possibly close the performance gap between it and the Hornet in the transonic to supersonic regime if you just talking about acceleration for intercepting or extending. No doubt it will help in the subsonic speeds.

Regardless, if the intakes were to be redesigned where performance instead of stealth was the primary, the plane could equal or even best the Hornet in acceleration.

#2129409 - 02/03/07 09:29 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: Frodo 13]  
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
H-6 Offline
Member
H-6  Offline
Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
LOSE the canted pylons.
My idea: an aerodynamic,low-RCS pod that contains the external armament? That's something I was thinking up.

Will increased thrust alone overcome the dragginess of this airframe? I read in one publication is that there will be a 25% increase in thruse

What I mean to say, Is there a threshold of increased engine power that you can never go over; ie a 50% increase in thrust?
I hope it gets to the point where it surpasses its predecessor rather than equals it.

#2129428 - 02/03/07 10:01 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: H-6]  
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,079
Frodo 13 Offline
Hotshot
Frodo 13  Offline
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,079
USA
What part of envelope are you referring about?

Subsonic, transonic, supersonic, altitude? Load out? etc...



There is a point when you can have too much thrust that the airframe can not handle.

#2129441 - 02/03/07 10:27 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: Frodo 13]  
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
H-6 Offline
Member
H-6  Offline
Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
I'm intersted in Load-out and supersonic and possible load-out while supersonic.

In general, I'd like to see improvements over every spectrum, an increase in reserved energy when needed- 25% increase will do fine.

It's correct that a over-increase will be a liability than an asset. I'm curious to know... "but can you do it!??"

What do you think about my "stealth pods"?

Last edited by H-6; 02/03/07 10:29 PM.
#2129452 - 02/03/07 10:52 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: H-6]  
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,840
ricnunes Offline
Senior Member
ricnunes  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,840
Portugal
Originally Posted By: H-6
I would eliminate the saw-tooth design altogether if possible. I forgot if that was for better slow speed handling or increased internal fuel capacity.


The saw-tooth design is to reduce the aircraft's Radar Cross Section (RCS) or in a simplier term to make the aircraft stealthier.

#2129566 - 02/04/07 03:43 AM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: ricnunes]  
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
H-6 Offline
Member
H-6  Offline
Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
I doubt that. The saw-tooth generates faster airflow over the ailerons for better manuverability and efficiency. The old Phantoms had them as well.

Last edited by H-6; 02/04/07 03:46 AM.
#2129788 - 02/04/07 03:18 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: H-6]  
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,840
ricnunes Offline
Senior Member
ricnunes  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,840
Portugal
Well that's what I've read.
And if you notice other stealth aircraft uses saw-tooth design in parts of their airframe. Examples are the F-22 and F-117 (in the landing gear bay doors and weapons bay doors). The Super Hornet also uses the saw-tooth design in the landing gear bay doors.
Anyway, I'm pretty sure that I read somewhere that that the saw-tooth design helps to reduce the aircraft's RCS but I don't remember where I read it and I also don't know how the saw-tooth design can reduce an aircraft's RCS.

#2129988 - 02/04/07 09:04 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: ricnunes]  
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
H-6 Offline
Member
H-6  Offline
Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
You're right about that, I was referring to the dogtooth design near the leading edge of the wing. The conflict is that it decreases the LE sweep. This is probably the main reason why there is such high bleed-off speeds at transonic and supersonic manuvers.

I don't know whether a stronger engine is the panacea to this power problem

#2130377 - 02/05/07 11:57 AM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: H-6]  
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,840
ricnunes Offline
Senior Member
ricnunes  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,840
Portugal
Humm, I see...

#2130759 - 02/05/07 10:08 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: ricnunes]  
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,079
Frodo 13 Offline
Hotshot
Frodo 13  Offline
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,079
USA
The dogtooth has nothing to do with RCS it's all about correcting airflow.



FWIW, the F15 has a dogtooth on its stabilators.

#2130807 - 02/05/07 11:10 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: Frodo 13]  
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
H-6 Offline
Member
H-6  Offline
Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
Is it(dogtooth) responsible for the transonic and supersonic fall backs??
I know there are other variables, but is this the main culprit?

Last edited by H-6; 02/05/07 11:11 PM.
#2131207 - 02/06/07 01:44 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of GE-F414-EDE for Super Hornet [Re: H-6]  
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,079
Frodo 13 Offline
Hotshot
Frodo 13  Offline
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,079
USA
No, the dog tooth was to break up the airflow disturbances along when pulling maneuvers. e.g. Adding alpha to the wing.

The major culprit of the slower acceleration is the intake as they wanted a lower RCS. Since you lower the RCS, you take away the performance from the intake that it can give to an engine due to the ram effect. IOW, you don't get a nice boost in thrust.

You want a good example?

Here's one. The anemic TF30 was a 20k lbs thrust class engine. Attributed to the installation losses, the install thrust is lower than its 'rated thrust', however, fly into the transonic at SL and due to the ram effect the engine picks up an additional thrust which puts this considerably over its rating, which 28K LBS.

The F15 and F16 intakes also gives this type of added performance.

#2131221 - 02/06/07 02:09 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of [Re: H-6]  
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,079
Frodo 13 Offline
Hotshot
Frodo 13  Offline
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,079
USA
Originally Posted By: H-6
I'm intersted in Load-out and supersonic and possible load-out while supersonic.

In general, I'd like to see improvements over every spectrum, an increase in reserved energy when needed- 25% increase will do fine.

It's correct that a over-increase will be a liability than an asset. I'm curious to know... "but can you do it!??"

What do you think about my "stealth pods"?


Anything you hang off the wings is a blows up RCS.

The structural integrity defines how much thrust you can use. While the F119 sans the vectorizing nozzles may fit in a F14, F15, and F16 you are pushing the airframe as they were designed with a certain amount of thrust. Basically, you don't put a 1000hp street in a car that came off the showroom floor. You need to either buy a new chassis or modify the hell out of the frame to handle the additional loads that this power plant will give.

sidenote: The F119 has been used in the F15 and F16 at Edwards

Now the question is would the additional 'thrust' close the gap when doing a 'speed of heat' intercept in a similar configured legacy Hornet? Yes, in theory it should make it close to even. However, I don't think the added thrust is going to match the F14B/D times though as the airframe was designed all about pure performance. The Hornet and Super Hornet airframe were all about multi-roles. Sure, nowadays you don't need M2+ but you still need the capability of running down or running away.

The added thrust would do wonders in the Ps department as I assume that she's a nominal 500-600f/s if input an operational load of two 480 jugs on board. Now the question is, "will it be a 1000f/s machine like the clean Raptor?" And the answer is "No' but she'll definitely be a lot higher and better than she was prior the engine upgrade.

One of these days, I am going to do an estimated 20-25% increased thrust to the F414 and see what the Psub shows me.

#2131579 - 02/06/07 09:24 PM Re: [News] The latest update on the development of [Re: Frodo 13]  
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
H-6 Offline
Member
H-6  Offline
Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 338
Ahh, so it's the fixed inlet? I think that's correctable.

How does the F-22 overcome that? 1000f/s is amazingly impressive.

Could you ever show me your calculations with the increased thrust?

A rated thrust of 28K in each engine would be ideal: The same ratio of power to max weight takeoff of the F-22. That comes to a 27% increase in thrust, which looks do-able. ... A mini F-119???

Another thing worth noting is to have a more streamlined fuselage to further decrease drag. Another possible solution, if it's even possible, is to tuck ATFLIR internally.

Is it possible to find out why the pylons are staying? I'm pretty sure they 're still restricted in their present stores cinfigurations, what's that all about!!?



Last edited by H-6; 02/06/07 09:36 PM.
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  RacerGT 

Quick Search
Recent Articles
Support SimHQ

If you shop on Amazon use this Amazon link to support SimHQ
.
Social


Recent Topics
Dickey Betts was 80
by Rick_Rawlings. 04/19/24 01:11 AM
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
Grumman Wildcat unique landing gear
by Coot. 04/17/24 03:54 PM
Peter Higgs was 94
by Rick_Rawlings. 04/17/24 12:28 AM
Whitey Herzog was 92
by F4UDash4. 04/16/24 04:41 PM
Anyone can tell me what this is?
by NoFlyBoy. 04/16/24 04:10 PM
10 Years ago MV Sewol
by wormfood. 04/15/24 08:25 PM
Pride Of Jenni race win
by NoFlyBoy. 04/15/24 12:22 AM
It's Friday: grown up humor for the weekend.
by NoFlyBoy. 04/12/24 01:41 PM
OJ Simpson Dead at 76
by bones. 04/11/24 03:02 PM
Copyright 1997-2016, SimHQ Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0