#119918 - 05/02/06 11:10 AM
Re: AMD vs. Intel
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,441
Kraut
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,441
Kit. Ont. Canada
|
Does it really matter that it's out of date? What they're comparing is very much apro to what most are using now. We've just switched over to AMD, due to what we've read on these boards, after 12+ years of Intel & so far, we're impressed & it's definately not all because of financial savings. It was just that AMD vs Intel stuff that swayed us & we were so satisfied, we built a second system. By the way, both top line chips are mentioned in the above out dated comparison. FWIW, Good Hunting!
|
|
#119920 - 05/02/06 11:10 PM
Re: AMD vs. Intel
|
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 15,786
Haggart
I Fought Diablo
|
I Fought Diablo
Veteran
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 15,786
The Lone Star State
|
They should be even better soon when AMD goes to DDR2
"everything lives by a law, a central balance sustains all"
|
|
#119922 - 05/03/06 02:42 AM
Re: AMD vs. Intel
|
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 15,786
Haggart
I Fought Diablo
|
I Fought Diablo
Veteran
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 15,786
The Lone Star State
|
Then again, the actual performance gain of AM2 seems to be in question
"everything lives by a law, a central balance sustains all"
|
|
#119924 - 05/04/06 05:28 AM
Re: AMD vs. Intel
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 275
Curious142
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 275
Broomfield, CO USA
|
Originally posted by Kraut: ...By the way, both top line chips are mentioned in the above out dated comparison. FWIW,... Does this mean that neither AMD or Intel have come out with anything new since Nov. '05? I hope that's not the case. That would be sad. CB
|
|
|
|