As usual, your AMD rose-tinted spectacles actually try to paint a different picture from what the article reports......I'm not sure why you repeat the headline of 'You didn't really expect native 8K at 60 fps, right?' when the 11 game benchmarks are displayed in the graph and yet 8 of them show games running at 8K natively without DLSS and at 60fps or over.

It should be pretty obvious you don't get 'real' 8k without a native 8k display and therefore it's absolutely pointless raving about DLSS and how 'simulated 8K' is such a limitation when you're talking about a card that can and does hit 8k @60fps natively.


You say you're interested in what it would take to get good 8K eventually....and there is your answer, the Nvidia RTX 3900 - the evidence is there, in the article that you linked to!

The thing is, you say you're a happy 4K gamer using an RX5700XT (a 1400p card) which averages 20-40fps in pretty much every game at a 4k resolution, so you can't claim that 60fps minimum is a requirement for contentment either. Sometimes the blind faith to a brand name really negates the text and the articles which you 'report' on! If you actually read the article closely, the real headline of the article is that 8K native at 60fps cannot be met without DLSS when raytracing is enabled. You can't claim that ray tracing is a requirement for contentment either because as an exclusive AMD gamer you're not even using it.