Simple summary:

AMD CPUs have caught up to Intel overall and AMD is competitive -- wins some and loses some. Now, its Intel that has to work hard to stay competitive.

Likewise with GPUs. Nvidia has the lead today. But, its really not a big lead -- comes down to what one has to pay that day. Most gamers do not buy $500 GPUs, they want to spend closer to $200 maximum. If AMD 7nm GPUs stay on track for launch next year or early in 2020, Nvidia will have to match (I assume they will). But, for practical (bang for buck) purposes, take away cryptocurrency GPU price rises and AMD technology is already competitive with Nvidia (or will be in 2019, depending on one's viewpoint).

Long term, "competitive" is all we consumers can hope for -- because the industry is reaching the end of what can be done with silicon (other than add more CPU cores or GPU shaders). Competition will give Intel, Nvidia, and AMD buyers the best products sooner, for less cash.

Competition is good smile


Sapphire Pulse RX7900XTX, 3 monitors = 23P (1080p) + SAMSUNG 32" Odyssey Neo G7 1000R curve (4K/2160p) + 23P (1080p), AMD R9-7950X (ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 420), 64GB RAM@6.0GHz, Gigabyte X670E AORUS MASTER MB, (4x M.2 SSD + 2xSSD + 2xHD) = ~52TB storage, EVGA 1600W PSU, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Full Tower, ASUS RT-AX89X 6000Mbps WiFi router, VKB Gladiator WW2 Stick, Pedals, G.Skill RGB KB, AORUS Thunder M7 Mouse, W11 Pro