People seem to forget, the x86 Instruction Set (as well as x-86-64) are owned by Intel, and most if not all of these games are compiled using Intel's Compiler, so they will favor Intel a bit.

Some Synthetic Benchmarks are the same, but you cant really favor one or another in raw performance.

None of these games have been patched or even looked at code wise to make sure there isnt anythng that needs changed to accommodate AMD Processors.

Most of the gaming scores are affected by the Mainboard's used.

They are using Brand New Boards w/ Version 1.0 BIOS's vs Matured Intel Platform, and more than HALF of the reviews have stated to have compatibility issues with Memory Sticks etc and forced to run them at much slower speeds, which will affect gaming FPS more than Synthetic CPU Benchmarks.


These Numbers are right where I Expected them to be, once Board Manufacturers Update the BIOS' to fix alot of the Ram and PCIe Issues, and Developers give their games a look to make sure there's not a conflict somewhere, those numbers will go up for gaming FPS.


HAF922, Corsair RM850, ASRock Fata1ity 990FX Pro,
Modified Corsair H100, AMD FX8350 @ 5.31GHz, 16GB G.SKILL@DDR2133,
2x R7970 Lightnings, +1 HD7950 @ 1.1/6.0GHz, Creative XFi Fata1ity Platinum Champ.,
3x ASUS VS248HP + Hanns�G HZ201HPB + Acer AL2002 (5760x1080+1600x900+1680x1050), Oculus Rift CV
CH Fighterstick, Pro Throt., Pro Pedals, TM Warthog & MFDs, Fanatec CSR Wheel/Shifter, Elite Pedals
Intensity Pro 10-Bit, TrackIR 4 Pro, WD Black 1.5TB, WD Black 640GB, Samsung 850 500GB, My Book 4TB