Originally Posted By: David_OC


Well MicroProse did bite off more then they could chew with the Dynamic campaign and thats why ED would hold off on doing it + it may not be profitable to do? you would need to check the market.



That's exactly what I was talking about in terms of "Pro-DCS argument", that argument is FALSE, period!

MicroProse demise has nothing to do with Falcon 4 dynamic campaign! You "DCS people" need to STOP this FALSE arguments! You want to argument, fine and right go ahead it's in your own right but for "Christ sake" don't use false arguments.

MicroProse financial problems started before 1996, which is well before any impact that Falcon4 with its dynamic campaign might have had on the company.
Later MicroProse was bought by the "giant" Hasbro which felt that combat flight simulations weren't the way to go (for the newly acquired MicroProse) and as such Hasbro/Microprose abandoned the combat flight sim market and as such promptly released Falcon 4 and the rest is history!

Beside, if there's any impact of the Dynamic Campaign on Falcon4, that impact is largely and overly POSITIVE (and definitely not negative) because Falcon4 still sells today (and as such still gives profit to someone) and this reason can almost solely be attributed to the Dynamic Campaign. Of course there's the BMS mod, but if Falcon4 didn't have such an awesome dynamic campaign would BMS ever made it's mode for it? My personal opinion is NO!

Anyway, you can read more about MicroProse here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MicroProse


It sure doesn't look like Falcon4 Dynamic Campaign was the culprit for Microprose's demise. But saying this suits your Pro-DCS agenda, doesn't it??