Not sure I agree. Or should I say, not sure I agree with the wording you've chosen.

I'd say that it's become focused on the wrong details. Details can/should be nothing but a good thing, but details in isolation without the depth surrounding them are largely worthless.

I do feel that recent debates around certain details have been somewhat erroneously presented. Don't think for a second that Noodle, I, or others would suggest that ITT modelling or other details are more important than something such as AI modelling (quite the opposite in fact). But if something can be improved then the aim of all parties should be to do so.