ED closes down the debates when it has gone far enough and hits a wall and gets silly. Remembered a debate is one thing, good real actionable wind tunnel and turbine data test papers are another and this is what ED needs to build their level of aircraft systems and FM's.

DCS: Bf 109 K-4 Kurfürst » Strange roll oscillations https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=173982

DCS: P-51D Mustang » engine startup modeling https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=175639&page=3

DCS: P-51D Mustang » TF-51 vs. P-51D engine cooling & durability https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=174093

The forum is full of discussions about how things should work? The bug sections are full of found bugs? I don't get what you mean by this? Can you tell me or show me a hidden or deleted questionable subject?

"anything questionable to ED is hidden or deleted and users banned"

If you have (good documented) info, Yo-Yo will debate it with you head to head no doubt in my mind when he has a little bit of time spare. Just don't go there and say he said she said type of conversation with no documentation to back it up.

I don't mind when 2.5 comes out as long as it's fairly good and stable and Not an "F4 MicroProse launch" just to get it out there etc.

Anyway Im more than happy with what I have, enjoy it very much and I'm willing to wait for 2.5 and the F14/F18. Plus we still have F4 BMS so its all good for now. Normandy soon I hope, Christmas?