Do you mean this?
Originally Posted By: Sobek
The point is that Georgia doesn't run in 2.0. If they were to ditch 1.5 now, we would "lose" Georgia until they are done with porting it to comply with how terrains work from 2.0 onwards. Essentially, people still flying in Georgia would have been stuck with whatever version number it was when 2.0 came out for potentially well over a year. No new modules with Georgia, no updates/bug fixes for existing modules. It would have been a drastic move.


I'm not quite sure you're answering my question here. You're telling me WHY you think ED is doing 1.5xxx/2.0/2.5, but I'm asking why their current approach (doing 1.5xxx/2.0/2.5) is a good idea? Why are they doing three things? Sure, not completely different versions, but still, three things. Why is focusing on ONE thing, in this case 2.5, not a good idea? Is there something that a developer or programmer sees in this framework that is not obvious to an outsider?


- Ice