So there you go, ED are involved with all of the points in my previous list - yes,
No, please actually read my answer.
Originally Posted By: Paradaz
ED are developing DCS, but they're also having to put additional resources into periphery that isn't essential and shouldn't be high on their priority list.
This is something that generates revenue. Do is really require an explanation in what way something that generates revenue for very little involvement is a good thing for the areas of work that don't directly generate revenue?
Originally Posted By: Paradaz
Now magnify this work by as many campaigns there are, now magnify it again when one of ED's builds breaks a campaign because all of this will need checking and updating.
You saying fixing a bug that breaks 10 campaigns is more work than fixing a bug that breaks one campaign?
As for testing, yes, fixes have to be tested. But whether you like it or not, much of that is being outsourced to the open beta program.
Originally Posted By: Paradaz
Surely you can see it's irrelevant who creates a campaign.
