You can't compare DCS with sims like Falcon BMS or the FSX Tacpack. Both of them work on existing platforms and "only" extend them. Eagle Dynamics, on the other hand, wrote the simulator including the engine on their own and have extensive sim development knowlegdge since over a decade.
Exactly my point. Other people are "extending" or reverse-engineering a platform and improving it and are doing a better job at it than someone who has made their "engine" from the ground up. "Extensive sim development knowledge"? I wonder how you quantify that.
Originally Posted By: codefox
They're doing an impressive job on DCS but all the community gets to do is complaining - man, just take a look at the other flight sims.. DCS is far ahead for most parts! Yes, DCS may be a little instable here and there and it also got plenty of bugs to sort out but tell me about one bug-free flight sim and I'll sell my soul!
Far ahead where exactly? "A little instable" is an understatement!