It's based on a campaign maker not needing specialist tools beyond what is already provided to them as part of the product in comparison to aircraft developers.
I don't quite see how this absolves 3rd party campaign makers from the responsibility of supporting their product. I also don't see what extra tools they'd require, other than the testing build they receive nightly.
Originally Posted By: Paradaz
You may say I have no evidence but you're not providing any either in your counter-argument, and as you've admitted in the past you're none the wiser than any of the customers. A lot of opinion is based on common sense but when discussing ED's business practice its often pointless because it seems to be something they use very little of.
Yeah I agree - there is no evidence, just assumptions. Neither of us know the contract between the the 2 parties. While you may assume a particular view, I may assume another. Neither being correct.
