Originally Posted By: Dane49
Well if your going into that much depth over authenticity,then you might as well go all the way and only include the period maps that each side had to refer to,and not the one that is displayed now in all its fine and accurate detail.Since I'm not really keen on authenticity at this level,I still prefer the clean and easily read NATO symbols to go with the clean looking and accurate map we now have.

In theory I agree completely. But I think our view is the minority. Also it would appear maps are generated direct from source files for the polygon. Meaning that yes indeed they are vary precise in some ways, but IMO do mot show enough detail for mild contours. Which means not a darn thing is actually wrong.