#2146252 - 02/25/07 02:31 PM
Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
bohica
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
|
Hi guys, I'm from the UK and fly the Su33/27 and am training with an online squad. I've been a big fan of LOMAC for while now and just updated to FC before Christmas. I've found this forum a big help. For some time I've been searching for info on how to estimate range using the SPO-15s Signal strength circle. A fellow virtual squad member said that that Ironhand had done some stuff but I only saw his tutorials. So after hours surfing and only finding broken links I did a test myself. I set the Su33/27 on a straight an level course on Auto Pilot and allowed all fighters with search radars to intercept. I paused the sim and measured the distances for each one as the signal strength lamps lit anti clockwise round the scale. The table below shows my results. The +7 to +1 is left of the nose symbol indicating the threat is closing. The -7 is the maximum range of the enemy search radar and is furtherest away. Hope you guys find this useful. If you have a few hours spare check my results.
Last edited by bohica; 02/25/07 02:35 PM.
|
|
#2146261 - 02/25/07 02:50 PM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: bohica]
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 780
Groove
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 780
|
|
|
#2146328 - 02/25/07 05:21 PM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: Groove]
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,892
GrayGhost
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,892
|
Keep in mind that, since this isn't teribly realistic, it will eventually get fixed.
-- 44th VFW
|
|
#2146350 - 02/25/07 05:58 PM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: GrayGhost]
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
bohica
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
|
Keep in mind that, since this isn't teribly realistic, it will eventually get fixed. I'm not sure what you mean by this. The data used by Lomac is reasonable, since Westinghouse etc don't really publish their radar specifics its hard for the Sim developers to model this. This is a sim and my intention was to inform those who enjoy it for what it is. Whether black shark addon will change these, I don't know. I thought it might be useful for those of us that enjoy flying the more demanding Russian A/C. The F15 TEWS (RWR) has a very different system which used in conjunction with the radar can give very detailed info regarding threats. I personally like the challenge of flying the Su27/33 but I know it's not everyones cup of tea.
Last edited by bohica; 02/25/07 05:59 PM.
|
|
#2146361 - 02/25/07 06:22 PM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: bohica]
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,892
GrayGhost
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,892
|
What I mean by it is that range estimation via RWR is realistically quite unreliable.
-- 44th VFW
|
|
#2146401 - 02/25/07 08:13 PM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: GrayGhost]
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 403
BritRadarDude
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 403
Chelmsford UK
|
Nice job bohica. That'll go into my useful info folder on my PC for sure. Nice that you included the L - Lock distance. Still can't decide whether I find your +7...0...-7 way of thinking about the SPO-15 easier than 15...1, I think I probably do.
You don't actually say it, but I assume those range are Km (and not Nm) right?
Incidentally does anyone know why it's called the SPO-15? Were there 14 previous versions of it, or is it named 15 because it has 15 levels of signal strength?
Sorry Death, you lose! It was Professor Plum...
|
|
#2146424 - 02/25/07 09:12 PM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: BritRadarDude]
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,314
BeachAV8R
Lifer
|
Lifer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,314
KCLT
|
Yes..good tool...it is always nice to see research done on how the sim works (I've seen some of BritRadarDude's stuff too..impressive!).. I'm sure mission designers and pilots alike benefit from this type of info...
Regards.. BeachAV8R
|
|
#2146534 - 02/26/07 12:58 AM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: BritRadarDude]
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
bohica
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
|
You don't actually say it, but I assume those range are Km (and not Nm) right?
Sorry I forgot to mention that the distances are in Kms. Also the Lock is based on the A/C radar not on missile range. In practice missile lock may vary depending on situation. So don't bank on the lock figures too much. I added them as an observation. Thanks guys for your encouragement. I plan to do a similar test on ground based radars.
|
|
#2146561 - 02/26/07 01:45 AM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: bohica]
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,971
EricJ
Me, just me.
|
Me, just me.
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,971
Baltimore, MD
|
Cool man, much appreciated. Was the hostile fighter at the same altitude as well?
Last edited by EricJ; 02/26/07 01:48 AM.
| My Books | Home Page | http://562.combatace.com/ | - 'Nearly everyone felt the need to express their views on all wars to me, starting with mine. I found myself thinking, I ate the crap sandwich, you didnt, so please dont tell me how it tastes.' - CPT Cole, US Army - "...parade ground soldiers always felt that way (contempt) about killers in uniform." -Counting The Cost, Hammer's Slammers
|
|
#2146571 - 02/26/07 02:01 AM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: EricJ]
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
bohica
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
|
Cool man, much appreciated. Was the hostile fighter at the same altitude as well? Yes the hostile A/C was at the same altitude. However I did a random test 1500 meters above and below and the result was the same. Also I did a test to see if the aspect angle made a difference. I placed a hostile 45 deg to the left and did the test. The results were the same. Also I did another where the hostile approaches at high speed from behind (rear aspect). Interestingly the results showed a slight drop in the maximum range of the search radar! But it was about 1-2 kms which is nothing much.
|
|
#2146781 - 02/26/07 01:16 PM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: bohica]
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 333
RSoro01
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 333
New Hampshire, USA
|
Interestingly the results showed a slight drop in the maximum range of the search radar! But it was about 1-2 kms which is nothing much... That's a result of keeping the radar set to interleaved PRFs (default). In that mode, it uses a mix of high and medium PRFs. So you don't detect an approaching or fleeing aircraft as quickly as you would using a "pure" Hi or Medium setting (Hi for approaching, Medium for fleeing). RWin-I is the toggle (available only in V1.1 and later).
|
|
#2146847 - 02/26/07 02:34 PM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: RSoro01]
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Jedi Master
Entil'zha
|
Entil'zha
Sierra Hotel
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Space Coast, USA
|
The most interesting rule of thumb I see here is that if the range ring lights up to the 12 o'clock position, in most cases you either can be or will soon be able to be locked on to. The absolute range differs, but it does seem to the be threshold.
The Jedi Master
The anteater is wearing the bagel because he's a reindeer princess. -- my 4 yr old daughter
|
|
#2146970 - 02/26/07 05:30 PM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: bohica]
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 969
FlashHeart
Old fart
|
Old fart
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 969
5256'N 002'W (UK)
|
I thought it might be useful for those of us that enjoy flying the more demanding Russian A/C.
Su27/33 demanding???? Try the Frog, m8! I know - just kidding - you have already
"The way you keep forgeting things, you'd think you'd remember" - my wife
|
|
#2147168 - 02/26/07 09:22 PM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: PanzerMeyer]
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,079
WalterNowi
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,079
Arcadia, CA
|
bohica,
Thanks. It is a really handy chart.
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 ASUS Sabertooth X79 4 x 4GB Crucial Ballistix VLP PC3-12800 ASUS Cerberus GTX 1070 Ti Seasonic Platinum 860W Thrustmaster Cougar Uber II Nxt CH Products PT/TQ/MFP Slaw Pedals TrackIR 5
|
|
#2147363 - 02/27/07 03:08 AM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: bohica]
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,971
EricJ
Me, just me.
|
Me, just me.
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,971
Baltimore, MD
|
Cool man, much appreciated. Was the hostile fighter at the same altitude as well? Yes the hostile A/C was at the same altitude. However I did a random test 1500 meters above and below and the result was the same. Also I did a test to see if the aspect angle made a difference. I placed a hostile 45 deg to the left and did the test. The results were the same. Also I did another where the hostile approaches at high speed from behind (rear aspect). Interestingly the results showed a slight drop in the maximum range of the search radar! But it was about 1-2 kms which is nothing much. True it doesn't mean much, but still maybe a few more seconds for you to get out of there, but that's dependant on other factors, so while it's not much, it can make somewhat of a difference somehow. Like a 3km minimum range for a Buk. Sure the hard part is just making it, but do the weapon delivery right and you're free to fly around. Though I'd expect the ground radars to be a little different given various altitudes, as there's more factors, such as if they actually model the terrain right, then you will obviously get a different result from a 50m ingress to a 4000m ingress, where at that level you'll get max detection range, while you can get obviously closer at 50m. I may take a flight just to mess around myself though. But FlashHeart is right, the -25T is a pain to fly while the other ones... yeah too easy, even the AFM A-10 is easy to fly.
| My Books | Home Page | http://562.combatace.com/ | - 'Nearly everyone felt the need to express their views on all wars to me, starting with mine. I found myself thinking, I ate the crap sandwich, you didnt, so please dont tell me how it tastes.' - CPT Cole, US Army - "...parade ground soldiers always felt that way (contempt) about killers in uniform." -Counting The Cost, Hammer's Slammers
|
|
#2147381 - 02/27/07 03:34 AM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: EricJ]
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,160
Cali
Military Advisor - USAF
|
Military Advisor - USAF
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,160
Davis-Monthan AFB, Az
|
Someone posted this a while back [img] [/img]
Last edited by Cali; 02/27/07 03:35 AM.
i5-2500k @ 3.3, Asus P8Z77-V LE mobo Windows 7 64-bit, 8GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 670 FTW 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, Warthog, uber modded Cougar, TM Cougar MFD's, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard
|
|
#2147390 - 02/27/07 03:46 AM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: Cali]
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,971
EricJ
Me, just me.
|
Me, just me.
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,971
Baltimore, MD
|
Nice.
98 kilometers at ~50m for the 1L13 against an Su-33 flying head on so far, so that should add a little bit to the scale.
| My Books | Home Page | http://562.combatace.com/ | - 'Nearly everyone felt the need to express their views on all wars to me, starting with mine. I found myself thinking, I ate the crap sandwich, you didnt, so please dont tell me how it tastes.' - CPT Cole, US Army - "...parade ground soldiers always felt that way (contempt) about killers in uniform." -Counting The Cost, Hammer's Slammers
|
|
#2147560 - 02/27/07 12:47 PM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: EricJ]
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
bohica
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 10
|
Yes the hostile A/C was at the same altitude. However I did a random test 1500 meters above and below and the result was the same. Also I did a test to see if the aspect angle made a difference. I placed a hostile 45 deg to the left and did the test. The results were the same. Also I did another where the hostile approaches at high speed from behind (rear aspect). Interestingly the results showed a slight drop in the maximum range of the search radar! But it was about 1-2 kms which is nothing much.
True it doesn't mean much, but still maybe a few more seconds for you to get out of there, but that's dependant on other factors, so while it's not much, it can make somewhat of a difference somehow. Like a 3km minimum range for a Buk. Sure the hard part is just making it, but do the weapon delivery right and you're free to fly around.
Though I'd expect the ground radars to be a little different given various altitudes, as there's more factors, such as if they actually model the terrain right, then you will obviously get a different result from a 50m ingress to a 4000m ingress, where at that level you'll get max detection range, while you can get obviously closer at 50m. I may take a flight just to mess around myself though.
But FlashHeart is right, the -25T is a pain to fly while the other ones... yeah too easy, even the AFM A-10 is easy to fly.
The original test was based on Air-to-Air threats (ie Aircraft). I'm working on ground based threats (SAMs/AAA/Radars) and I will be testing at different Altitudes to see what the effect is. The SPO-15 can only receive threat information at +/- 30 degrees vertical axis (altitude). Given that the sensors are fore and aft there will be a blind spot as the A/C flies close to the radar threat depending on altitude. I started last night and already I've noticed some interesting stuff. This test may take a while longer so watch this space...
Last edited by bohica; 02/27/07 02:48 PM.
|
|
#2147620 - 02/27/07 01:57 PM
Re: Russian RWR Signal Strength Range
[Re: bohica]
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Jedi Master
Entil'zha
|
Entil'zha
Sierra Hotel
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Space Coast, USA
|
There is no AFM A-10. Only the Su-25 and 25T have AFMs.
The Jedi Master
The anteater is wearing the bagel because he's a reindeer princess. -- my 4 yr old daughter
|
|
|
|