#4441169 - 09/27/18 08:24 PM
Re: Obscure scenarios
[Re: Moggy]
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 516
RIBob
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 516
|
@ Moggy
Does the scenario terrain include the other, outlying USAAF airfields? If so, I could see some scenarios with increased warning time to American forces making a significant difference, and that might make for a vastly more interesting scenario. The increased warning time could have occurred from many different origins, so a variable amount of early warning, depending on the source of the warning, is historically quite possible.
With user-variable warning time(s), the number and tactical formation/positions of USAAF aircraft could be varied. So could the ships. With adequate warning, at least the ships (and ground AA) would be better-manned, and with greatly increased warning, some/all of the ships could have sortied, and possibly be out of danger, or moving into position to attack the Japanese fleet. Certainly, more USAAF aircraft would have been in the air, and most likely in a position to intercept incoming Japanese aircraft. Even the B-17s might have flown-off to attack the Japanese fleet, which, at that moment in history, was their intended role.
As one might imagine, there have been written many such "Alternative History" scenarios, with various outcomes.
By the same token, the (historically) absent carriers might be in port, which were the real target of the Japanese in the first place. The possibility of a third strike, argued-for by Kenda, would be interesting. If the oil tank farm had been destroyed, the US might have had to send surviving naval forces back to continental US, thus affecting the outcome of the war incalculably. As in No Midway, No submarine campaign.
Aircraft AI would certainly favor the far more experienced Japanese pilots at that point in the war. AA effectiveness would need to be dialed-up, depending on amount of warning. At some point of prior warning, it would be maxxed-out. FWIW, US Regular infantry troops were trained in massed AA fire, and that massed fire should not be dismissed as ineffective at that place, and point in time, with enemy aircraft focusing on a immovable attack point.
This scenario offers up tremendous opportunities. To my (imperfect) knowledge, there has never been done a Pearl Harbor sim where the Americans were allowed better/more timely forewarning of the attack, and all that might have devolved from that.
If some sim developer wants to develop this sort of scenario, I humbly offer my help.
Submitted for your consideration
Last edited by RIBob; 09/27/18 08:41 PM.
|
|
#4441221 - 09/28/18 03:10 AM
Re: Obscure scenarios
[Re: Moggy]
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,267
iron mike
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,267
Maryland, USA
|
Hey Ray, Too bad it doesn't have the actual air wings from the Akagi, Hiryu, Soryu and Kaga eh? If only they were available to use... Hey Mogggy, by some odd quirk of fate aren't those carriers and air wings show up at Midway? If only those skins existed. Too bad they won't be used if they did... or, would they? Nah, those old bland EAW skins will do just fine... oh btw..... Akagi (Red Castle) Zero Zero Kate Val Hiryu (Flying Dragon) Zero Kate Val Kaga (Kaga Province, Ishikawa Prefecture {current name} Zero Kate Val Soryu (Green Dragon) Zero Kate Val http://SimHQ.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/4095083/ijn-air-groups-midway-1942
Last edited by iron mike; 09/28/18 03:12 AM. Reason: forgot Ray
|
|
#4441293 - 09/28/18 04:12 PM
Re: Obscure scenarios
[Re: Moggy]
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,497
MrJelly
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,497
Montagnac, L'Herault, France
|
Fly EAW online at GameRanger: GameRanger SiteFaceBook Pages UAW 160 downloadsEAW ClubMark Twain: I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man's reasoning powers are not above the monkey's.I am now of an age at which I no longer need to suffer fools gladly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|