#4418198 - 04/28/18 02:16 AM
Re: Big budget but still terrible
[Re: PanzerMeyer]
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 26,564
wheelsup_cavu
Lifer
|
Lifer
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 26,564
Corona, California
|
My absolute top 3 Cameron films: Aliens, Terminator 2, Terminator.
Avatar, The Abyss and Titanic were ok.
True Lies was just stupid. I thought Tom Arnold was great in True Lies. Bill Paxton as the sleazy car salesman putting the moves on his clients was great too. Wheels
|
|
#4432914 - 08/04/18 05:16 AM
Re: Big budget but still terrible
[Re: PanzerMeyer]
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,705
Blade_RJ
Simhq Weather man, dropping rain in your parade
|
Simhq Weather man, dropping rain in your parade
Hotshot
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,705
brasil
|
I've seen many sci-fi movies over the years that had tiny production budgets and I can completely understand why the acting, production values and script were not very good. This is not to say that there haven't been good sci-fi movies that were made on a small budget but they are relatively rare.
Having said that, I find it really absurd and sad that 70 million or more can be spent on a sci-fi movie and it STILL turns out to be a turd. Here are a few examples:
Battlefield Earth (2000) budget: 73 million Valerian (2017) budget: 177 million Jupiter Ascending (2015) budget: 176 million Babylon AD (2008) budget: 70 million Geostorm (2017) budget: 120 million Battleship (2012) budget: 209 million Independence Day: Resurgence (2016) budget: 165 million
Valarian IS GOOD, the problem with the film is that it created so much about the genre that when you actually adapted it, it became cliche of itself, also the main actors are dull and uncharismatic,that hurts a lot, i personally would had changed the ending to non cliche. the worst offender is IDR, like what the #%&*$# ! not even going to put the 22 years of waiting, who aproved that script ? a giant alien queen ? man some executive really had a beef and wanted to outdo cameron.
|
|
#4432977 - 08/04/18 03:26 PM
Re: Big budget but still terrible
[Re: PanzerMeyer]
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,572
Arthonon
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,572
California
|
I'll add Star Trek Into Darkness here - that movie was offensively bad in my opinion. It was like the makers said, "Hey Star Trek fans, we're going to make a movie that lacks creativity and makes no sense, but in the process, we're going to crap all over the movie you like best. "
|
|
#4433024 - 08/04/18 08:27 PM
Re: Big budget but still terrible
[Re: Arthonon]
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,841
F4UDash4
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,841
SC
|
I'll add Star Trek Into Darkness here - that movie was offensively bad in my opinion. It was like the makers said, "Hey Star Trek fans, we're going to make a movie that lacks creativity and makes no sense, but in the process, we're going to crap all over the movie you like best. " +1
"In the vast library of socialist books, there’s not a single volume on how to create wealth, only how to take and “redistribute” it.” - David Horowitz
|
|
#4433513 - 08/08/18 01:42 AM
Re: Big budget but still terrible
[Re: Arthonon]
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,985
wormfood
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,985
Texas
|
I'll add Star Trek Into Darkness here - that movie was offensively bad in my opinion. It was like the makers said, "Hey Star Trek fans, we're going to make a movie that lacks creativity and makes no sense, but in the process, we're going to crap all over the movie you like best. " Worst of the three new movies by a country mile.
|
|
#4433519 - 08/08/18 02:32 AM
Re: Big budget but still terrible
[Re: wormfood]
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,841
F4UDash4
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 13,841
SC
|
I'll add Star Trek Into Darkness here - that movie was offensively bad in my opinion. It was like the makers said, "Hey Star Trek fans, we're going to make a movie that lacks creativity and makes no sense, but in the process, we're going to crap all over the movie you like best. " Worst of the three new movies by a country mile. I wouldn't say "by a country mile" as I found "Star Trek Beyond" to be pretty ridiculous as well. All of Abrams movies were to me just SciFi action flicks in ST uniforms on ST ships, but "Beyond" was the worst in that regard.
"In the vast library of socialist books, there’s not a single volume on how to create wealth, only how to take and “redistribute” it.” - David Horowitz
|
|
#4433743 - 08/09/18 06:02 PM
Re: Big budget but still terrible
[Re: FlyingToaster]
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,468
PanzerMeyer
Pro-Consul of Florida
|
Pro-Consul of Florida
King Crimson - SimHQ's Top Poster
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,468
Miami, FL USA
|
I haven't watched True Lies in years, but remember it being a very fun no-brainer action film. You go in expecting explosions and stunts and one-liners and some sort of plot hanging it together.
Agreed. What made the film work is that the film made no pretenses about what it was. It was Cameron's farcical take on the popcorn action movie genre that became so popular in the 80's.
Last edited by PanzerMeyer; 08/09/18 06:03 PM.
“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
|
|
#4435472 - 08/23/18 05:20 PM
Re: Big budget but still terrible
[Re: PanzerMeyer]
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,712
Dart
Measured in Llamathrusts
|
Measured in Llamathrusts
Lifer
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,712
Alabaster, AL USA
|
Battlefield Earth (2000) budget: 73 million The first movie I ever sat all the way through saying "Da Fuq" and letting it just roll over me like a huge series of car wrecks. But not the good kind where they blow up real good. More like parking lot fender benders. Where the drivers are Polish and Armenian and yell at each other in their native languages with the subtitles in French. It really is an artistic accomplishment when one thinks about it: It's terrible from top to bottom. But no so terrible that it's funny and enjoyable. Keeping that perfect balance is a rare and wonderous thing.
The opinions of this poster are largely based on facts and portray a possible version of the actual events. More dumb stuff at http://www.darts-page.comFrom Laser: "The forum is the place where combat (real time) flight simulator fans come to play turn based strategy combat."
|
|
|
|