#4425644 - 06/11/18 07:07 PM
Gone, But Not Forgotten – A Comeback for the F-14 Tomcat?
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 160
Bandit4
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 160
|
|
|
#4425648 - 06/11/18 07:16 PM
Re: Gone, But Not Forgotten – A Comeback for the F-14 Tomcat?
[Re: Bandit4]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
Was that supposed to be taken seriously?
- Ice
|
|
#4425656 - 06/11/18 07:41 PM
Re: Gone, But Not Forgotten – A Comeback for the F-14 Tomcat?
[Re: Bandit4]
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,581
Raw Kryptonite
Beat the Kobayashi Maru
|
Beat the Kobayashi Maru
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,581
MS
|
That whole article says basically nothing. LOL The last excerpt negates it all, stating the obvious.
“Although appreciation still exists for the classic F-14 and its commendable service history, the Navy will likely continue upgrades to the Super Hornet to make it more combat effective and rely on the newer aircraft to meet its future needs.”
It would be interesting if they could be updated, but what a waste of money with waiting for the F35’s after all these years.
·Steam: Raw Kryptonite ·MWO & Elite Dangerous: Defcon Won ·Meager youtube channel·Intel i5-9600K ·EVGA GTX1070 FTW 8GB ·EVGA CLC 120 Cooler ·16 GB Patriot Memory VIPER 4 3000MHz ·GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS PRO WiFi Mobo · CORSAIR CARBIDE AIR 540 case ·BenQ BL3200PT monitor
|
|
#4425665 - 06/11/18 08:29 PM
Re: Gone, But Not Forgotten – A Comeback for the F-14 Tomcat?
[Re: Bandit4]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
Exactly. If the Tomcat was retired due to maintenance costs and being behind the times, why on Earth would it make a comeback when there's a newer airframe that costs less to maintain and has newer equipment? I just hated myself a bit more for making that statement but such is the truth!
- Ice
|
|
#4425714 - 06/12/18 02:13 AM
Re: Gone, But Not Forgotten – A Comeback for the F-14 Tomcat?
[Re: Bandit4]
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,612
KRT_Bong
It's KRT not Kurt
|
It's KRT not Kurt
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,612
Sarasota, Florida
|
But really what we should ask ourselves is are there any Tomcat Air frames left in storage to even consider resurrecting? Truth be told the article is suspicious ahead of a possible Top Gun II reference? If the Navy was open to a Grumman refit of old F-14 Airframes they would first have an operational airframe yes?
Windows 10 Pro Gigabyte 970A DS3P FX AMD FX6300 Vishera 3.5 Ghz ASUS STRIX GeForce GTX 970 Overclocked 4 GB DDR5 16Gb Patriot Viper 3 RAM DDR3 1866Mhz Onikuma Gaming Headset (has annoying blue lights I don't use)
|
|
#4425715 - 06/12/18 02:26 AM
Re: Gone, But Not Forgotten – A Comeback for the F-14 Tomcat?
[Re: Bandit4]
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,712
Dart
Measured in Llamathrusts
|
Measured in Llamathrusts
Lifer
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,712
Alabaster, AL USA
|
Hey, what's that Japanese anime where they fly Gen 2 and 3 aircraft against Gen 4 aircraft that are controlled by aliens?
Apparently that's all they could get to work, so it was F-14's and stuff against F-35's.
The opinions of this poster are largely based on facts and portray a possible version of the actual events. More dumb stuff at http://www.darts-page.comFrom Laser: "The forum is the place where combat (real time) flight simulator fans come to play turn based strategy combat."
|
|
#4425771 - 06/12/18 03:28 PM
Re: Gone, But Not Forgotten – A Comeback for the F-14 Tomcat?
[Re: Bandit4]
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,723
bones
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,723
Earth
|
Sadly the F-14 airframes that were left that weren't used for museums were mothballed at AMARC in AZ....and since then they have been shredded. I haven't been to AMARC in a long time but looking at recent pix on Google Earth and such, it does look like what I heard is true--they are gone. Not including the IRIAF Tomcats, but that's kind of a moot point.
Now that's not to say someone doesn't have a blueprint to be able to produce more of them, but it would be pretty costly starting from scratch. I hear over and over about how the maintenance cost of the Tomcat and parts were astronomical, but from what I also heard, alot of this is due to the loss of tooling used to make those parts that were disposed of when Cheney killed the program. So naturally, it was harder to make spares without extra costs.
That aside, the F-14 was not really as behind the times as one thought. The F-14 turned out to be more ahead of its time than when it was first conceived. Tomcats has precision strike capability that was greatly enhanced by the LANTIRN system to the point that during OIF generals were tasking F-14s for more precision strikes than they were their own F-15Es. When ROVER first came out, it was quickly adapted to the F-14 and it was added at such a low cost and turnaround time it was astounding. When it went into operation a mere few weeks later, the precision strike capability got even better.
Then of course you have its air to air weapons, particularly Phoenix. The Phoenix never really got to see its fair share of combat use in the US Navy, but that coupled with not just the AWG-9 but the Delta's APG-71 radar is still hard to beat. The article made no mention of theTomcat's radar, particularly the AGP-71...and the radar really was the Tomcat's biggest "gun." No other airborne radar in a combat aircraft has been as powerful or effective as that.
So I of course would love to see the Tomcat make a comeback, and it's nice to know that people in the Navy think so too...but they are sadly sadly just thoughts. The economics of it all and the current political atmosphere will most likely not allow for it.
But it's the thought that counts!
v6, boNes
"Also, I would prefer a back seater over the extra gas any day. I would have 80 pounds of flesh to eat and a pair of glasses to start a fire." --F/A-18 Hornet pilot
|
|
#4425809 - 06/12/18 07:58 PM
Re: Gone, But Not Forgotten – A Comeback for the F-14 Tomcat?
[Re: Bandit4]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
Where'd you get that info, bones? Would love to have a read!
One thing that confuses me though --- why can't we have a Tomcat shell but with upgraded innards? Kind of like how people restore old muscle cars, but with newer engines, more modern shock absorbers, etc. So keep the Tomcat shape but improve the avionics. Surely with advancement in tech, stuff has gotten smaller and so a more advanced radar would still fit inside the Tomcat?
- Ice
|
|
#4425810 - 06/12/18 08:06 PM
Re: Gone, But Not Forgotten – A Comeback for the F-14 Tomcat?
[Re: - Ice]
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,723
bones
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,723
Earth
|
Where'd you get that info, bones? Would love to have a read!
One thing that confuses me though --- why can't we have a Tomcat shell but with upgraded innards? Kind of like how people restore old muscle cars, but with newer engines, more modern shock absorbers, etc. So keep the Tomcat shape but improve the avionics. Surely with advancement in tech, stuff has gotten smaller and so a more advanced radar would still fit inside the Tomcat? Stuff I've come across over studying the Tomcat since the 80s. Alot of it was also from people in the know at Grumman, USN, etc. As for keeping the shell and changing the innards. Well, you still need a shell...and they have all been shredded. That's just for starters. The titanium wing gearbox I'm sure is not an attractive expense having to make those all over again too... v6, boNes
"Also, I would prefer a back seater over the extra gas any day. I would have 80 pounds of flesh to eat and a pair of glasses to start a fire." --F/A-18 Hornet pilot
|
|
#4425820 - 06/12/18 08:51 PM
Re: Gone, But Not Forgotten – A Comeback for the F-14 Tomcat?
[Re: Bandit4]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
Well, I could be wrong but one thing that made the Tomcat great was the shape, right? So we know that aerodynamically, that layout works. So why not rebuild it but update the insides?
Also, why shred the Tomcats? Are they running out of space?
- Ice
|
|
#4425831 - 06/12/18 09:51 PM
Re: Gone, But Not Forgotten – A Comeback for the F-14 Tomcat?
[Re: - Ice]
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,402
Zamzow
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,402
|
Also, why shred the Tomcats? Are they running out of space?
I read a long time ago that all things F-14 were destroyed to ensure zero possibility of anything F-14 ending up in Iranian hands. Iran would pay massive money to anyone who could get them parts.
|
|
#4425834 - 06/12/18 09:55 PM
Re: Gone, But Not Forgotten – A Comeback for the F-14 Tomcat?
[Re: Zamzow]
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,723
bones
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,723
Earth
|
Also, why shred the Tomcats? Are they running out of space?
I read a long time ago that all things F-14 were destroyed to ensure zero possibility of anything F-14 ending up in Iranian hands. Iran would pay massive money to anyone who could get them parts. Yes this is correct, and also because of the value of scarp giving a return on investment in some sad way. In one documentary about it they said, "So the next time you drink your favorite soda from a can, think: the material used in this can might have been flying at supersonic speed over the trouble hotspots of the world." Talk about putting it in depressing perspective. v6, boNes
"Also, I would prefer a back seater over the extra gas any day. I would have 80 pounds of flesh to eat and a pair of glasses to start a fire." --F/A-18 Hornet pilot
|
|
#4425836 - 06/12/18 09:56 PM
Re: Gone, But Not Forgotten – A Comeback for the F-14 Tomcat?
[Re: bones]
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,402
Zamzow
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,402
|
The article made no mention of theTomcat's radar, particularly the AGP-71...and the radar really was the Tomcat's biggest "gun." No other airborne radar in a combat aircraft has been as powerful or effective as that What about the F-22?
|
|
|
|