#4401359 - 01/22/18 01:45 PM
Decision needed on EECH codebase account
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,883
messyhead
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,883
|
Hi folks. Since before Christmas, I've been trying to get in touch with Executioner about the eech.codebasehq account through PMs and also email. I've also opened a support ticket at codebasehq to see if they can contact him. But we've not had any contact.
At the moment, he is the only account admin that was in contact, and he also pays the subscription fee for the account, which is due to be renewed in August. The codebasehq support have said they'd need his permission in order to upgrade anyone else to an account admin, with the ability to change the billing or renew the subscription.
I was upgraded to an admin a couple of months ago, and I emailed every registered member asking if they still needed an account, and have been deleting those that either said they didn't need one, or didn't reply. So we're down to 15 user accounts on codebasehq, from I think 24 or 26.
However, the codebasehq account is a paid for account, and not free to use. Executioner paid for a year subscription last year, after a couple of months of it lapsing.
Even if we managed to cut the number of users down to 10 (which was my plan with the emails) it would still be $9/month.
So as it stands, the account will lapse in August unless Executioner comes back in contact.
Therefore, we need to decide what to do with the codebase. There are free code repositories, Github being probably the most well known. However, the code was released under licence, and users had to agree to that licence before being given access. This was the main reason it was uploaded to a controlled repo. I'm no legal expert, and so I have no idea whether the licence still applies as the publisher, and software house are no longer existing. I also don't know whether having commercial code hosted on something like Github is even allowed. And then there's the issue of having anyone be able to access it, and use it however they wish, if it's on an open repo.
There's also the hassle of moving the code, as we'd probably want to move some of the previous branches and try to keep the log history intact.
So I thought I'd just post this now so those of us that have an interest can decide what needs to happen. I did wonder whether we could approach SimHQ to host a repo and put it on there, and then access could be controlled, in terms of agreeing to the licence. I could also look into setting up my own server and hosting it. I had thought about setting up my own web server for a while anyway for a couple of other personal projects.
Last edited by messyhead; 01/22/18 01:48 PM.
|
|
#4401402 - 01/22/18 07:04 PM
Re: Decision needed on EECH codebase account
[Re: messyhead]
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,382
thealx
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,382
|
That's important question actually, tried to raise it before but it always ends with nothing.
As for open source repository - you are right that it will be impossible, I am not license specialist either but was told so by experienced developers.
If SimHQ will host repository same way as they did with eechcentral, when it was half broken for year, no thank you. If it will has 99% uptime - sure, why not.
Personal server can provide required functionality, but it will take some of your personal time, and when you will be no longer interested in this project, or just not available, it can make a problem. So it will be your decision, I am not against it but not recommend. Have my own EECH repo available but hardware is not reliable and internet quite slow, so it can be only a reserve solution.
Decreasing Codebase subscription fees and pay for it by ourselves is the best one. But, account owner should grant admin rights at least several active devs. In case of $9/m I can pay half of the sum without problem, but I really believe that we can collect at least part of the payment from the crowd. Not like ask for donation in every single post, but create a topic a month before subscription ends where ask to support project.
|
|
#4401413 - 01/22/18 08:44 PM
Re: Decision needed on EECH codebase account
[Re: thealx]
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,883
messyhead
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,883
|
That's important question actually, tried to raise it before but it always ends with nothing.
As for open source repository - you are right that it will be impossible, I am not license specialist either but was told so by experienced developers.
That limits choices then to controlled repo. That's what I thought would be the case. If SimHQ will host repository same way as they did with eechcentral, when it was half broken for year, no thank you. If it will has 99% uptime - sure, why not. They didn't host it before when it went down. It was hosted by another forum member. SimHQ have hosted it since it was recovered. Personal server can provide required functionality, but it will take some of your personal time, and when you will be no longer interested in this project, or just not available, it can make a problem. So it will be your decision, I am not against it but not recommend. Have my own EECH repo available but hardware is not reliable and internet quite slow, so it can be only a reserve solution. If I did it, then I would build in availability. If I ever give it up completely, then I'd arrange for something else before I did. I was going to set up a webserver anyway for my own site that I'm building. Decreasing Codebase subscription fees and pay for it by ourselves is the best one. But, account owner should grant admin rights at least several active devs. In case of $9/m I can pay half of the sum without problem, but I really believe that we can collect at least part of the payment from the crowd. Not like ask for donation in every single post, but create a topic a month before subscription ends where ask to support project. I was thinking of some sort of crowd sourcing for it, but it would depend on who would want to keep funding it. We'd also need to remove 5 more accounts to get it down to the $9/month limit, and we wouldn't be able to add any new users. Perhaps another repo with a similar price but more users could be found.
Last edited by messyhead; 02/01/18 09:56 AM.
|
|
#4414163 - 04/01/18 04:45 PM
Re: Decision needed on EECH codebase account
[Re: thealx]
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,922
Marc
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,922
Corona, California
|
but I really believe that we can collect at least part of the payment from the crowd. Not like ask for donation in every single post, but create a topic a month before subscription ends where ask to support project.
I for one am willing to donate Marc..
HP-Compaq-8100-Elite-SFF-Intel-Core-i5-660-3-33GHz-8GB-250GB-Windows7, GTX1050 -X45+Rudder Pedals, Playseat Challenge
|
|
#4415569 - 04/10/18 01:33 AM
Re: Decision needed on EECH codebase account
[Re: messyhead]
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,922
Marc
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,922
Corona, California
|
What's happening with this?
Marc..
HP-Compaq-8100-Elite-SFF-Intel-Core-i5-660-3-33GHz-8GB-250GB-Windows7, GTX1050 -X45+Rudder Pedals, Playseat Challenge
|
|
#4415920 - 04/11/18 10:22 PM
Re: Decision needed on EECH codebase account
[Re: messyhead]
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,922
Marc
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,922
Corona, California
|
I'm still willing to donate, $3 a month or $36 for one year( I have paypal too)
Marc..
HP-Compaq-8100-Elite-SFF-Intel-Core-i5-660-3-33GHz-8GB-250GB-Windows7, GTX1050 -X45+Rudder Pedals, Playseat Challenge
|
|
#4416412 - 04/15/18 08:43 PM
Re: Decision needed on EECH codebase account
[Re: messyhead]
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,883
messyhead
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,883
|
Can someone try accessing this url? You should just see an Nginx welcome page.
EDIT: link removed while I'm setting things up
I'm experimenting with setting up a web server.
Last edited by messyhead; 04/16/18 07:41 AM.
|
|
#4416414 - 04/15/18 08:55 PM
Re: Decision needed on EECH codebase account
[Re: messyhead]
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 486
XIII
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 486
|
|
|
#4427807 - 06/26/18 09:37 AM
Re: Decision needed on EECH codebase account
[Re: messyhead]
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,883
messyhead
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,883
|
Hi. I've been looking into this today, and I think the best option would be to use Amazon CodeCommit. It's there hosted git repo, and it can be set up as a private repo. The first 5 active users are free, then it's only $1 per month for each user over that. https://aws.amazon.com/codecommit/pricing/It looks quite good. I've got an AWS account already, so I'll try setting up the repo today and see how it goes. I think we only have about 5 active devs at the moment, so we could maybe manage to keep it free for a while. As for paying for extras, I'll see if there's a way that the additional users are billed. I don't think I'll transfer all of the current users over. If anyone is needing a read only copy, then I could do something like have a downloadable copy in my google drive for them to use. Update: I'm also considering Google Source Repositories. Their definition of a user means that we could have potentially more 'inactive' users than on AWS. Google only considers active users to be those that read or write to the repo. So anyone browsing it online isn't counted. AWS count anyone logging in to the management console as a user, whether they read/write to the repo or not. Update 2: I'm going to go with AWS for now. I think there definition of an active user is actually the same, it's just subtle differences in how they word it.
Last edited by messyhead; 06/26/18 10:05 AM.
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|