#4362622 - 06/07/17 07:26 PM
New total war historical game information
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,803
Forward Observer
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,803
Central Arkansas,US of A
|
Here's a link to the latest "what we are currently working on" announcement from Creative Assembly. The first part deals with their fantasy game "Warhammer", but then they go on to update what their historical teams are working on. It appears that there are now 3 separate items. One of course is the next major historical title and the other two are to fill in the gap until the major title is released. https://www.totalwar.com/blog/what-the-teams-are-working-on-07-06-17/Basically 1 and 2 are the gap filling releases and three is the major new title. Number two appears to be a more recent decision and will be a stand alone game. 1. A new content campaign DLC for a recent historical title to be released later this year. This would would almost have to be for Attila or Rome 2--more likely it would be Attila, but no mention of the exact subject matter. They do include a piece of concept art with a character who could either be a Celtic, Germanic, or Viking chieftain. The sword pommel certainly looks Viking. 2. A brand new stand alone expansion similar to Fall of the Samurai, which they are calling a "Flash-point" game that concentrates on a short time span in history. They mention that it is a period that they have visited before and that it's a favorite. This would probably hit next year, and I would have thought maybe a Viking invasion, but I can't imagine them doing this twice in a row unless that piece of art work for the DLC has nothing to do with Vikings. 3. Then comes the next major historical title--probably year after next, which they say covers an era they have never visited before. No clue as to the subject matter at all. Cheers .
Artillery adds dignity to what would otherwise be a vulgar brawl.
|
|
#4363271 - 06/11/17 05:47 PM
Re: New total war historical game information
[Re: PanzerMeyer]
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,803
Forward Observer
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,803
Central Arkansas,US of A
|
Thanks for that info FO. I'll buy buying ALL of those historical titles and DLC's.
I have zero interest in the fantasy stuff like Warhammer but I'm very happy that it sold like crazy since that directly benefits Creative Assembly. I'm of the same mind. It's hard to believe that I've been playing the same game franchise for 17 years now. I didn't buy the first Shogun at release, but found a new boxed copy in a bargain bin at an Electronics Boutique store in the local mall about 4 or 5 months later. I think it was $10 or less, so I took a chance. I've been hooked ever since. Of course the developers have had their ups and downs, but they have still given me lots of gaming nirvana. Cheers
Artillery adds dignity to what would otherwise be a vulgar brawl.
|
|
#4370297 - 07/21/17 06:51 AM
Re: New total war historical game information
[Re: Forward Observer]
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,945
Nimits
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,945
United States of America
|
Depending on how they define it, there are not a lot of options for "unvisited" eras. Western History has been pretty-well covered from Ancient Greece through 1815, and a majority of the major conflicts withing the Japanese empire were included in the two Shogun games. Assuming they do not go into the 20th century (which I think would be a mistake), you really have only mid-19th century, Ancient/Medieval China, or the Biblical-era Middle Eastern empires. The former would interest me most, but I am not sure how much enthusiasm any of those would generate in the American and European strategy game markets.
As for me, I very much prefer the gunpowder era Total War games over the ancient and medieval titles. My ideal would be either an ACW-focused game, or a revisit of the the 18th and 19th century, but with the better AI and 40-unit battles we saw in Shogun, Rome, and Attila.
Last edited by Nimits; 07/21/17 06:53 AM.
|
|
#4370356 - 07/21/17 02:52 PM
Re: New total war historical game information
[Re: Forward Observer]
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,292
DBond
Strategerizer
|
Strategerizer
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,292
NooJoyzee
|
I cut my TW teeth on Medieval 2, and loved it. For whatever reason I held off for a long time on getting in to gunpowder TWs. Not sure why really, but once I did I found I preferred it to the melee titles. Gunpowder era is perfectly suited to the TW engine. I can't say I care too much about which conflict the next game will feature, but I've found that assymetric/dissimilar forces make for interesting gameplay and battles. So the mid to late 19th century I see as sort of the sweet spot. ACW, yes. World War I, sure, why not. I have to admit I am quite interested in how this would turn out. Submarines and tanks Like PM, I would buy a new Napoleon or Empire era game. I'd even go for a new Medieval 2. The TW formula works, and works quite well. However, I'd really like to see the devs devote time to rethinking the non-combat aspects of the series. I don't see it happening, as if it ain't broke don't fix it. As long as the formula sells, there is little compelling reason to innovate. Politics, economy, diplomacy, supply and communication, unrest,recruitment and more are all modeled in a very simplistic way. I would like to see those aspects given an overhaul, but not holding my breath.
No, now go away or I shall taunt you a second time!
|
|
#4371064 - 07/26/17 04:20 PM
Re: New total war historical game information
[Re: Forward Observer]
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,920
Dick Dastardly
I Don't Care Bear
|
I Don't Care Bear
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,920
Earth
|
New era? Anglo-Zanzibar war. Epic campaign consisting of 180 15-second turns. Would have loved to see Empire 2, period offers a lot and the original got short changed a bit with some issues never truly ironed out ACW could be interesting.
Suicide is man's way of telling god "You can't fire me, I quit!"
|
|
#4371089 - 07/26/17 06:59 PM
Re: New total war historical game information
[Re: EAF331 MadDog]
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,473
PanzerMeyer
Pro-Consul of Florida
|
Pro-Consul of Florida
King Crimson - SimHQ's Top Poster
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,473
Miami, FL USA
|
I woiuldn't be surprised if a China/Asia scenario pops up.
China is an increasing market adn catering to them might be a sensible thing. Also there are tons of time periods there which would be extremely intersting to play in. Agreed. I think a TW title covering the "Warring States Period" of Chinese history would do very well. I'd buy it for sure! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warring_States_period
“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
|
|
#4372647 - 08/03/17 11:55 PM
Re: New total war historical game information
[Re: Forward Observer]
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,945
Nimits
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,945
United States of America
|
You may be right, and that would definitely track with the "new era" hint, but I hope not. Like with Shogun II (where I bought "Fall of the Samurai" for the 19th century/ACW-era tech, but skipped the base and the Rise of the Samurai), there would have to be some very compelling game play reasons, outside of its setting, to make me want to buy it. It is not an auto-"no buy" like the Warhammer stuff was, but I am not particularly interested/excited about ancient/medieval Asian history (or really, any era of ancient/medieval history that does not involve the Greeks, Romans, English, or French in a meaningful way).
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|