#4345113 - 03/17/17 07:55 PM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: watermanpc]
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 209
Dondy
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 209
Germany
|
"F-5 Freezes DCS completely, CTD, regardless if in the air or ground." And at the same time releasing a new campaign for the F-5 in Nevada.
In memory of the JaboG34 "Allgu" Memmingen 1959-2003 Last take-off: 17.12.2002 10:06am
Legends may sleep but they'll never die
|
|
#4345169 - 03/18/17 12:33 AM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: watermanpc]
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 772
Johnny_Redd
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 772
|
"DCS C-101 by AvioDev Fixed auto startup sequence. No more BLOC.CAB announcement after autostart. Fixed main wheels coordinates, wheel smoke will be shown correctly now. Fixed helmet visor texture (removed banding)." I'm so glad I bought this module when all that was wrong with it was the helmet textures, smoke positioning and the auto startup sequence. I'm so glad they're working so hard on my purchase.
DCS Kickstarter Wags July 2014 "In this July 2014 update, the primary news is in regards to the restructured backer rewards. After a careful review of the older system under RRG, we found it financially unattainable." Wags October 2017 "the investment vs. generated revenue has been excellent for the World War II aircraft. In fact, the P-51D Mustang has twice the cost effectiveness of the A-10C Warthog."
|
|
#4345172 - 03/18/17 12:36 AM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: Johnny_Redd]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
all that was wrong with it was the helmet textures, smoke positioning and the auto startup sequence. Priorities. Like Normandy over 2.5. How many people are waiting for Normandy? As opposed to those waiting for 2.5?
- Ice
|
|
#4345175 - 03/18/17 01:02 AM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: Dondy]
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,079
the soupdragon
Sexy Beast
|
Sexy Beast
Hotshot
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,079
Cardiff South Wales UK
|
"F-5 Freezes DCS completely, CTD, regardless if in the air or ground." And at the same time releasing a new campaign for the F-5 in Nevada. F-5 works for me both off and online. I actually joined a server(which I never normally do . Offline only usually must be 15 years since I played online) and managed to start the F-5 and take off. It's a strange one. But I agree promoting an F-5 campaign when there a re obviously some issues with it does seem a bit strange. But the again THIS IS DCS !!!!!!!! (Said in a Gerard Butler kind of voice ) SD
From the hills rebounding Let this war cry sounding Summon all at Cambria's call The mighty force surrounding
Men of Harlech onto glory This shall ever be your story Keep these fighting words before ye Welshmen never yield
|
|
#4345591 - 03/20/17 02:16 PM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: watermanpc]
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Jedi Master
Entil'zha
|
Entil'zha
Sierra Hotel
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Space Coast, USA
|
It does say "we can't reproduce them" which means it's not all users experiencing these given problems. I don't know how many people are seeing them.
I mean, "F-15C control axis don't work." and "A-10C Crash when battery switch is used from cold start" seem like things that a LOT of people would be complaining about if it was widespread.
The Jedi Master
The anteater is wearing the bagel because he's a reindeer princess. -- my 4 yr old daughter
|
|
#4345687 - 03/20/17 06:52 PM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: Jedi Master]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
It does say "we can't reproduce them" which means it's not all users experiencing these given problems. I don't know how many people are seeing them.
I mean, "F-15C control axis don't work." and "A-10C Crash when battery switch is used from cold start" seem like things that a LOT of people would be complaining about if it was widespread. Irrelevant. We all know how ED picks which bugs they want to tackle and which ones they've chosen to ignore --- and we all know that the ability to reproduce a bug isn't the criteria for working on it
- Ice
|
|
#4345694 - 03/20/17 07:02 PM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: - Ice]
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,042
cichlidfan
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,042
Woodbridge, VA, USA
|
Irrelevant. We all know how ED picks which bugs they want to tackle and which ones they've chosen to ignore --- and we all know that the ability to reproduce a bug isn't the criteria for working on it Is that a royal 'we' or do you have a mouse in your pocket?
Last edited by cichlidfan; 03/20/17 07:03 PM.
ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1
|
|
#4345697 - 03/20/17 07:11 PM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: cichlidfan]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
Is that a royal 'we' or do you have a mouse in your pocket? Do you have a counterpoint or is word nitpicking the best you can do?
- Ice
|
|
#4345712 - 03/20/17 08:31 PM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: - Ice]
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 623
Sobek
Professional scapegoat
|
Professional scapegoat
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 623
|
Do you have a counterpoint or is word nitpicking the best you can do?
I think his point is quite valid.
|
|
#4345813 - 03/21/17 09:39 AM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: Sobek]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
Your post did not really represent opinions from all over the spectrum that make up this forum. I think suffice to say it represents enough opinions to be valid. Now about that counterpoint.... was there one?
- Ice
|
|
#4345841 - 03/21/17 12:53 PM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: - Ice]
|
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 87
watermanpc
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 87
Spain
|
Nice idea watermanpc! Just don't be surprised if things get "critical". It won't be long berfore some people here because they can't handle truth and logic. Yeah!, I know ...but even then, it would be great to be able to freely discuss about updates in a REAL way, not as in other forums where the only things you will find about new updates are " selectively ignored bugs" (God, thats a really accurate way of describing it Ice ) in the bugs sub forums and/or just people congratulating because its the "day for updates", even if the update is just a pile of crap or there is no update at all ... meanwhile here, we can discuss how they decided that fixing things like " Encyclopedia. Some updates and bugfixes" was a priority over the utterly broken (for 5/6 months) 2.0 version which hasnt even been acknowledged by devs (f**k logic!!).
Last edited by watermanpc; 03/21/17 12:54 PM.
i7 6700K/// Z170X-UD3 /// GB GTX 1070G1 /// 16Gb@2800 /// SSD + 1Tb Barracuda x2 (DCS here) /// NOX Hummer M750 /// HOTAS WartHog /// DIY IR Clip+Opentrack+PS3 EYE 60-120fps /// Win10 pro 64
|
|
#4345994 - 03/22/17 06:24 AM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: - Ice]
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 623
Sobek
Professional scapegoat
|
Professional scapegoat
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 623
|
I think suffice to say it represents enough opinions to be valid. Now about that counterpoint.... was there one? When you say we, you should qualify who you mean by that. You obviously don't speak for the forum, however at this point it is impossible to know even who you *think* you speak for.
Last edited by Sobek; 03/22/17 08:02 AM.
|
|
#4346004 - 03/22/17 08:44 AM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: Sobek]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
When you say we, you should qualify who you mean by that. You obviously don't speak for the forum, however at this point it is impossible to know even who you *think* you speak for. I'm sorry but if I have to explain to you who or what "we" means, well, I don't have the time, patience, or the crayons for what you want me to do. Feel free to replace "we" with "I" if it bothers you that much, then I invite you to tackle the remainder of the post, the actual CONTENT of the post. Try to stop focusing on that one word if it confuses you that much and move on. Otherwise, good luck with your strawman argument.
- Ice
|
|
#4346071 - 03/22/17 03:13 PM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: - Ice]
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,042
cichlidfan
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,042
Woodbridge, VA, USA
|
Irrelevant. We all know how ED picks which bugs they want to tackle and which ones they've chosen to ignore --- and we all know that the ability to reproduce a bug isn't the criteria for working on it No you don't know how ED decides anything. You might profess to know, but you don't. You may think that reproducing a bug has nothing to do with fixing it, but you would be wrong since knowing the cause of a bug is actually quite important with regard to fixing it. There, I ignored your poor command of the language and addressed the points that you attempted, badly, to make.
ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1
|
|
#4346165 - 03/22/17 09:02 PM
Re: DCS 1.5 / 2.0 Updates discussion thread
[Re: cichlidfan]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
No you don't know how ED decides anything. You might profess to know, but you don't. You may think that reproducing a bug has nothing to do with fixing it, but you would be wrong since knowing the cause of a bug is actually quite important with regard to fixing it.
There, I ignored your poor command of the language and addressed the points that you attempted, badly, to make. Wow... took you two days to come up with that? My "command of the language" (a 2nd language at that!... or maybe fourth... do different dialects count??) must be really, really poor then. Please cite where else I've gone wrong other than your strawman "we" nitpick, that I may learn the language even better. As for your counterpoint, again, do I have to draw you a picture for you to understand it? There are bugs in this sim that are easily reproduced and have been around for YEARS... therefore, the ability to reproduce a bug is not the criteria for working on a fix for the said bug. I've never said "reproducing a bug has nothing to do with fixing it"... nice try for another strawman argument though. Let's now see how long it takes you this time. No pressure.
- Ice
|
|
|
CD WOFF
by Britisheh. 03/28/24 08:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|