Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#4341183 - 02/28/17 11:53 PM More 160 Dunkirk  
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
Moggy Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Moggy  Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
A slit trench at RAF Gravesend
Nice to see that all all the things we worked on in 128/129, smoky tmods, all the single mission stuff, sunrise and sunset, all still there and functioning in 160.

Still recovering Dunkirk:

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]




Last edited by Moggy; 02/28/17 11:55 PM.
Inline advert (2nd and 3rd post)

#4341214 - 03/01/17 03:29 AM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,497
MrJelly Offline
Veteran
MrJelly  Offline
Veteran

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,497
Montagnac, L'Herault, France
Great Moggy smile
I have been working on the railway page of the target editor.
Where a line crosses a bridge it can calculate the direction of the line, which can be set as the direction of the bridge smile

Attached Files bridge.jpgbridge1.jpg
Last edited by MrJelly; 03/01/17 03:33 AM.

Fly EAW online at GameRanger: GameRanger Site

FaceBook Pages
UAW 160 downloads
EAW Club

Mark Twain: I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man's reasoning powers are not above the monkey's.

I am now of an age at which I no longer need to suffer fools gladly
#4341243 - 03/01/17 09:59 AM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
Moggy Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Moggy  Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
A slit trench at RAF Gravesend
That's good stuff. At some point I will have to get my head around the way railways now work.

It was also my original intention to make a set of "canal" tiles, since there were many canals in the Dunkirk hinterland which are inaccurately currently inaccurately represented by river tiles. Am I right in thinking convoys now run on "invisible railways", and so it would be possible to have barge convoys running on such invisible tracks?

#4341255 - 03/01/17 11:49 AM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,859
Rotton50 Offline
3DZ / campaign designer
Rotton50  Offline
3DZ / campaign designer
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,859
Cape Charles, Virginia, USA
Oh sure, NOW you fix the bridge thing. Talk about a lot of labor, whew!

What I finally did with the ETO2015 target upgrade package was to edit the rail lines so that they crossed the rivers at 0, 90, 180, 270 degrees. That way placing the bridge was pretty straight forward.

I did the same thing with the railroad stations and warehouse districts That way adding TMODs was fairly easy because everything was in a straight line.

FWIW, I recorded the number of meters that various buildings needed to be placed near the rail lines so that they looked as real as possible.

Actually I have a lot of that type of info for other TMOD placement so if you want those numbers let me know.


Heck, even paranoids have enemies.
#4341256 - 03/01/17 11:55 AM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,497
MrJelly Offline
Veteran
MrJelly  Offline
Veteran

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,497
Montagnac, L'Herault, France
Try this one smile
Fly a 190 mixed interdiction to London but follow the Thames as you fly through the city.
Alternatively fly an allied mixed interdiction to Paris and follow the Seine. There are barges on the Elbe too near Harburg and Hamburg.

Attached Files Barge.jpg

Fly EAW online at GameRanger: GameRanger Site

FaceBook Pages
UAW 160 downloads
EAW Club

Mark Twain: I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man's reasoning powers are not above the monkey's.

I am now of an age at which I no longer need to suffer fools gladly
#4341265 - 03/01/17 01:04 PM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,859
Rotton50 Offline
3DZ / campaign designer
Rotton50  Offline
3DZ / campaign designer
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,859
Cape Charles, Virginia, USA
i don't know if you're interested but you could add this modification to the target package. I ran out of steam on the target upgrade package before I could wrap my head around the barges so I just put some static groups of them in the middle of some of the rivers.

I'm up to my ears in plane upgrades so i won't be able to do it for quite a while.


Heck, even paranoids have enemies.
#4341290 - 03/01/17 02:38 PM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
Moggy Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Moggy  Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
A slit trench at RAF Gravesend
Oh good. It's possible then.

Ray - currently on the old Dunkirk layout I also have static ships and barges on the rivers near target areas.

#4341326 - 03/01/17 05:12 PM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,859
Rotton50 Offline
3DZ / campaign designer
Rotton50  Offline
3DZ / campaign designer
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,859
Cape Charles, Virginia, USA
Moggy, if you're interested I can tell you how to put targetable cargo on the decks of the ships. You can see what I mean if you load the ETO2015 package in 1.5.

Fly a mission to Portsmouth and check out the convoy just outside the harbor.


Heck, even paranoids have enemies.
#4341431 - 03/02/17 07:08 AM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
Moggy Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Moggy  Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
A slit trench at RAF Gravesend
I will have a look thanks. I half redid the layout when working on the 129 version, so I will need to revisit the layout in some places.

#4341439 - 03/02/17 10:14 AM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,859
Rotton50 Offline
3DZ / campaign designer
Rotton50  Offline
3DZ / campaign designer
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,859
Cape Charles, Virginia, USA
OK.

I won't go into great detail but basically I took regular TMODs like the ground planes, put them in a different TMOD slot and raised them up some distance above ground level using 3dz Studio.

Then using the target editor I placed them over a freighter and offset them by a small amount. It took a lot of trial and error to get the offset numbers correct but in the end I had rows of vehicles and planes on the decks of the freighters. I recorded all these numbers for future use.

The other thing I had to do was make some full height damage models for the freighters otherwise if you destroy the ship the vehicles would be hanging in mid air. These also needed their own separate TMOD slot. Fortunately we have 1000 now so there's plenty of room for this type of thing.


Heck, even paranoids have enemies.
#4341444 - 03/02/17 10:45 AM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
Moggy Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Moggy  Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
A slit trench at RAF Gravesend
Ingenious ideas. I will try that out.

Talking of offsets and trial and error reminds me of how I did initial layouts by hex editing, before the days of Jel's editors. That sort of thing can drive you crazy! I used to drop tmod markers into the game, take screen shots, draw a lot of lines, and work out manually the grid reference entry for tardata.dat for each target.

[Linked Image]

Then Jel rescued our sanity

#4341463 - 03/02/17 12:57 PM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,859
Rotton50 Offline
3DZ / campaign designer
Rotton50  Offline
3DZ / campaign designer
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,859
Cape Charles, Virginia, USA
I did something similar when laying out the various structures around the airfields.

As you know we have about 10 or so airfield shapes but they don't show up in the target editor. All you see is a red circle.

So to get an outline of the airfield I used the target editor to put a grid of about 100 radar towers right across the airfield.

Then I observed the towers in the game ( towers gave good visibility ). Next I started deleting towers in the editor simply guess which ones might be at the edges of the field. I kept doing this until I had an outline of towers around the filed. As you can imagine there was a lot of deleting and observing.

Once I had the outline I could start replacing towers with actual airfield related objects as well as add more.

I did this with each airfield outline and then I varied the airfield structures to that they didn't all look the same.

On a related note, don't forget we have the ability to switch TMOD models based on which side of the front line they're on.


Heck, even paranoids have enemies.
#4341478 - 03/02/17 02:01 PM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
Moggy Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Moggy  Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
A slit trench at RAF Gravesend
Great minds consistently think alike smile

I haven't done much with the tmod/tmog/tmof thing. Something else to wrap my head around. At least there's more time now.

I intend to get a basic 160 version of Dunkirk working so I can share it. The good thing is that 160 is a lot easier to work with than I imagined. Jel was right all this time smile I just have to get used to the different file loading priority, and how it deals with default files.

After that, next up would be a look at where I was with the 129 version of Midway with the proper geographic layout (with added atolls), and see how easily that can be brought into 160.

#4341493 - 03/02/17 02:55 PM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,497
MrJelly Offline
Veteran
MrJelly  Offline
Veteran

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,497
Montagnac, L'Herault, France
I have been working on the target editor, focussing on one that is specifically for railway building.

The attached opening screen is a map built from the eaw32.tm and eaw16.hm files together. It is effectively a height map picture. I am using squares and not circles as a did previously.
This allows the user to keep the railway tracks in low flat areas and avoid steep slopes.
To make the three tracks shown in the attached picture I clicked on the "Draw railway" check box so that it was checked. clicked on the start point, then on the next, and so on until I had finished.the first line.
I clicked on the "Draw railway" check box so that it was no longer checked. Doing this caused the editor to put the nodes into the railways grid, and cleared the (X,Y) coordinates list., ready for the second line.
Repeating the process allowed me to make the second and third lines.
When it was finished I went to the "Railways" page, re-set the section numbers and saved my new "EAW_RRD.dat" file wink

Selecting an area allows fine tuning, on the "Railways" page but the lines created on the first screen are a great starting point, and much better than the ones created by previous versions smile
For my own convenience I have made the form much bigger. I had trouble reading the stuff on the old editors, now that I am using a 1920x1080 screen.

Attached Files RailwayTED.jpg

Fly EAW online at GameRanger: GameRanger Site

FaceBook Pages
UAW 160 downloads
EAW Club

Mark Twain: I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man's reasoning powers are not above the monkey's.

I am now of an age at which I no longer need to suffer fools gladly
#4341514 - 03/02/17 03:56 PM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
Moggy Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Moggy  Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
A slit trench at RAF Gravesend
thumbsup

#4342299 - 03/06/17 09:00 AM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
Moggy Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Moggy  Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
A slit trench at RAF Gravesend
A few beach screenies:

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Last edited by Moggy; 03/06/17 09:01 AM.
#4342316 - 03/06/17 12:54 PM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,497
MrJelly Offline
Veteran
MrJelly  Offline
Veteran

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,497
Montagnac, L'Herault, France
Moggy are you getting the smoky TMods in 160 with your current version of Dunkirk?
If so please send me your "TMod.dat" and your "GEAWTTD2.dat" files, plus any modified "TModxyz.DAT" files

It looks as though Ralf's code only applied to objects placed by "GEAWTTD2.dat", and it would be nice to have them smoking when placed by 'tardata.dat".


Fly EAW online at GameRanger: GameRanger Site

FaceBook Pages
UAW 160 downloads
EAW Club

Mark Twain: I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man's reasoning powers are not above the monkey's.

I am now of an age at which I no longer need to suffer fools gladly
#4342337 - 03/06/17 03:45 PM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
Moggy Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Moggy  Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
A slit trench at RAF Gravesend
Hello Jel,

I'm using 160OldMapV6, and I'm getting smoky tmods as placed on tiles by GEAWTTD2.dat. That seems to be working okay. As I recall I think Ralf's code only did apply to TTD objects.

The files are in your folder.

Last edited by Moggy; 03/06/17 03:51 PM.
#4342343 - 03/06/17 03:59 PM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,497
MrJelly Offline
Veteran
MrJelly  Offline
Veteran

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,497
Montagnac, L'Herault, France
I just rewrote a lot of Ralf's smoke and fire code.
To test it I made a quick "GEAWTTD2.dat" file with at least one hangar on every coastal tile.
I had the "TMod027.dat" file open in the editor.
Using the hangar in place of a factory with a chimney then this is what I achieved:
Unlike Ralf's code my routine reserves the values of "SmokeOffsetX" and "SmokeOffsetZ" to position the smoke.
The size of the smoke is dependent on the "Smoke" value smile

Attached Files 002.jpg003.jpg

Fly EAW online at GameRanger: GameRanger Site

FaceBook Pages
UAW 160 downloads
EAW Club

Mark Twain: I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man's reasoning powers are not above the monkey's.

I am now of an age at which I no longer need to suffer fools gladly
#4342398 - 03/06/17 06:18 PM Re: More 160 Dunkirk [Re: Moggy]  
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
Moggy Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Moggy  Offline
EAW Old Timer and Bodger
Hotshot

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,427
A slit trench at RAF Gravesend
That is good stuff Jel.

Have you kept Ralf's controls on smoke colour and occurance of fire with the smoke?

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RacerGT 

Quick Search
Recent Articles
Support SimHQ

If you shop on Amazon use this Amazon link to support SimHQ
.
Social


Recent Topics
Carnival Cruise Ship Fire....... Again
by F4UDash4. 03/26/24 05:58 PM
Baltimore Bridge Collapse
by F4UDash4. 03/26/24 05:51 PM
The Oldest WWII Veterans
by F4UDash4. 03/24/24 09:21 PM
They got fired after this.
by Wigean. 03/20/24 08:19 PM
Grown ups joke time
by NoFlyBoy. 03/18/24 10:34 PM
Anyone Heard from Nimits?
by F4UDash4. 03/18/24 10:01 PM
RIP Gemini/Apollo astronaut Tom Stafford
by semmern. 03/18/24 02:14 PM
10 years after 3/8/2014
by NoFlyBoy. 03/17/24 10:25 AM
Copyright 1997-2016, SimHQ Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0