#4174557 - 09/28/15 07:42 PM
Anyone still playing Armored Warfare?
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 905
Snake_Pliskinn
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 905
Enterprise, AL
|
Been playing early access and public stress test server for last couple of weekends (should be open beta very soon) and find it enjoyable. Not a simulation, but tactical principles do have good effect in game (shoot and move to another position, maneuver for flank shots; ammo selection). Some things are a bit wonky such as targets disappearing when they should be visible (or at least I think so, I guess the algorithms think otherwise). Not a simulation as I've already mentioned, but IMHO, it captures the nature of armored combat. There is a single player (cooperative) mode with three different levels of difficulty. As with any online game, coop brings different types of players but run and gun players don't typically last very long in a round. A very nice variety of vehicles available (what other game features a MBT-70?).
Last edited by Snake_Pliskinn; 09/30/15 06:21 PM.
|
|
#4176199 - 10/01/15 11:59 PM
Re: Anyone still playing Armored Warfare?
[Re: Snake_Pliskinn]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
Watching a few YT vids, it seems like it has a PvE element which I like but I don't think I'm a fan of the HP system. It also looks like the tanks are in tip-top shape until their HP goes to zero then it just dies.
I'm coming from War Thunder wherein a tank can take a few hits and still keep going, although with very much reduced efficiency. Tanks can also be one-shot-killed from ammo explosions or fuel explosions or fuel fires or just enough fragmentation damage to kill all (or enough) of the crew.
- Ice
|
|
#4177843 - 10/05/15 09:54 PM
Re: Anyone still playing Armored Warfare?
[Re: Snake_Pliskinn]
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,581
Raw Kryptonite
Beat the Kobayashi Maru
|
Beat the Kobayashi Maru
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,581
MS
|
They lose functionality as they get beaten up, and shot placement/ammo used is very important. The best way I can describe it is that it's not a sim, but it's still technical and tactical, so I wouldn't call it arcade by any means either. What little PvE I've played was in a group, was very good. They still had the enemy popping up in awkward spawn locations was our biggest complaint, but I suspect that will be addressed. The first level was basically an intro mission, the second much longer with various objectives. It's looking good, so I sprung for the $15 package. Really enjoyed the early access period before. Check out their armor and ammo official videos, that better describes what's going on than just watching game play. That's what convinced me to give it a go to begin with after I had the same impression as you.
·Steam: Raw Kryptonite ·MWO & Elite Dangerous: Defcon Won ·Meager youtube channel·Intel i5-9600K ·EVGA GTX1070 FTW 8GB ·EVGA CLC 120 Cooler ·16 GB Patriot Memory VIPER 4 3000MHz ·GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS PRO WiFi Mobo · CORSAIR CARBIDE AIR 540 case ·BenQ BL3200PT monitor
|
|
#4180736 - 10/12/15 08:23 PM
Re: Anyone still playing Armored Warfare?
[Re: Snake_Pliskinn]
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,120
Chucky
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,120
UK
|
Just downloaded it today,will see what it's like.
20 gig download? That's just the installation files,the game install is another 23 gig.Thanks to the wonders of fibre I managed it reasonably quickly.
My default graphics setting is ultra,giving me around 30 fps.That surprised me,I thought it would bring this laptop to its knees.WoT does its best to and that's on med to high settings.
Last edited by Chucky; 10/12/15 08:24 PM.
EV's are the Devils matchbox.
|
|
#4181855 - 10/15/15 11:26 AM
Re: Anyone still playing Armored Warfare?
[Re: Snake_Pliskinn]
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 850
Ronin_GE
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 850
|
Tried it for starters...to me it seems just like world of tanks.Only with models that look like modern AFV. In my p.o.v. it has the same up/down sides as WoT...and I did not like that one.
Summary: good tactical shooter, nice graphics. But too small maps and all vehicle interfaces look alike. ( no FCS what so ever...ok, not that you'd need one as usual combat ranges are well below 800)
Last edited by Ronin_GE; 10/16/15 01:12 PM.
|
|
#4182453 - 10/16/15 06:31 PM
Re: Anyone still playing Armored Warfare?
[Re: Snake_Pliskinn]
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 22
warrior2seven
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 22
San Tan Valley, Az
|
How is the grind compared to WT Ground Forces? I hate having to grind to get the vehicles I want to play. I finally have all the German armor I like in WT and am currently working down the US line a bit...but man I hate the grind.
US ARMY Infantry 2000-2007
|
|
#4184531 - 10/21/15 08:45 PM
Re: Anyone still playing Armored Warfare?
[Re: Snake_Pliskinn]
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,270
sinner6
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,270
Fort Worth,TX
|
crossposted from the AW thread in the MWO forum:
I really liked it, playing as Recon. I found that if I hold down "e" while spotting an enemy, a countdown time will start and my guy will "call in fire". Any damage done to the enemy while spotted in this way gets credited to me as "spot damage". Perhaps it's all my time playing long range dakka in MWO, but gunnery was a hoot, and the game rewards good tactics. It also is very punishing of bad tactics.
The number and variety of maps is already impressive, as is the destructibility of many items. For instance, you can knock a tree down in the direction of your choice, and then use the fallen tree as concealment.
I also liked the progression system. The XP points you use to upgrade your vehicle are the same that count toward progressing to the next vehicle, so you must choose between saving for the next tier, or upgrading the vehicle in hand. Speaking of upgrades, the crew and retrofitting system allow for some tailoring to your play style and vehicle type.
Having played Combat Mission Black Sea and Flashpoint campaigns (which aim to model armor battles in a realistic way), the sudden, decisive nature of the combat in this game actually feels reasonably correct, and I appreciate that the matches are generally short, but with a fair amount of tactical decision making compressed into that time.
Having said that, my opinion was not unanimous among the player who joined last night, so your mileage may vary.
I will probably be back on tonight, working on leveling my recon vehicles.
Steam: Sinner6 Uplay: Sinner76028 MWO: Sinner6
|
|
#4200621 - 11/30/15 03:05 AM
Re: Anyone still playing Armored Warfare?
[Re: Snake_Pliskinn]
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,188
Gunnyhighway
Move, Strike, Protect
|
Move, Strike, Protect
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,188
San Diego, CA
|
Nope, I don't anymore. I was disappointed by that game.
Fluctuat Nec Mergitur
This is not the bars that keep the Tiger in the cage, this is the space between the bars.
|
|
#4202508 - 12/04/15 04:28 AM
Re: Anyone still playing Armored Warfare?
[Re: Snake_Pliskinn]
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,111
Ark
Cat Herder
|
Cat Herder
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,111
Fresno, CA.
|
Play it every day. Love it.
Ark
Windows 7 x64 Asus P6T Deluxe mobo Core i7 920 @ 4.0 6GB G.Skill DDR3 1600 Evga GTX 680 Classified SB X-FI Fatality 640GB WD "Black" 1GB WD "Black" LG 39" LCD / Dell 3007WFP-HC 30" LCD / Acer H233H 23" LCD
RIP Positive G
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|