Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
#4085976 - 03/01/15 08:34 PM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,699
NavyNuke99 Offline
One Man Wolfpack
NavyNuke99  Offline
One Man Wolfpack
Hotshot

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,699
Raleigh, NC
They've actually done that, in at least one episode of Voyager that comes to mind right off the top of my head, and I feel like at least on one other occasion in one of the shows or movies or something like that.

As for the ground troops, I've wondered that as long as I can remember. I've rewatched (so far) The Motion Picture and Wrath of Khan, and in both of those movies, nods were given to Security personnel having some kind of body armor and helmets. And then I think of the DS 9 episode, "The Siege of AR-558," where regular Starfleet personnel are acting as ground troops with light weapons, no body armor or shielding of any kind, and no heavy weapon support of any kind. I have a hard time buying that Starfleet, after preparing for and being at war with the Dominion for several years, wouldn't have better options.


" And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the United States Navy.'"- John F. Kennedy

"NUKE-ular. It's pronounced NUKE-ular."- Homer Simpson

AMD FX-8350 Vishera @ 4.0 Ghz
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0
2x 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 @ 1600
Sapphire Radeon HD 7850 2GB
CM Storm Series Trooper
Samsung 840 series 500 GB OS/ Game drive
WD Green 2TB Media Drive
Thermaltake Black Widow 850W PSU
Inline advert (4th to 5th topic)

#4086044 - 03/01/15 10:48 PM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,481
PanzerMeyer Online centaurian
Pro-Consul of Florida
PanzerMeyer  Online Centaurian
Pro-Consul of Florida
King Crimson - SimHQ's Top Poster

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,481
Miami, FL USA
Originally Posted By: CG2015
I was just watching the one scene in Star Trek Nemesis, the battle between 2 Romulan Warbirds and the Enterprise against the Scimitar.

It sure didn't take but a few hits from the Scimitar to disable both Warbirds.

What the heck kind of weapons those Warbirds have? Just disruptors against a cloaked warship? Nothing heavier and more powerful and more damaging?

The Enterprise wasn't doing any better at damaging the Scimitar by firing photon torpedoes and quantum torpedoes at it. It might as well be spitting on it.


The Scimitar was a one of a kind ship and it represented the pinnacle of Reman technology thus it was able to easily defeat the Romulan warbirds.


“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
#4086112 - 03/02/15 01:42 AM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,581
Raw Kryptonite Offline
Beat the Kobayashi Maru
Raw Kryptonite  Offline
Beat the Kobayashi Maru
Veteran

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,581
MS
Voyager got pretty good at dealing with the Borg. They did do the land Shark candygram trick with the torpedo once or twice.


·Steam: Raw Kryptonite ·MWO & Elite Dangerous: Defcon Won ·Meager youtube channel
·Intel i5-9600K ·EVGA GTX1070 FTW 8GB ·EVGA CLC 120 Cooler
·16 GB Patriot Memory VIPER 4 3000MHz ·GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS PRO WiFi Mobo
· CORSAIR CARBIDE AIR 540 case ·BenQ BL3200PT monitor
#4086202 - 03/02/15 10:47 AM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: PanzerMeyer]  
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 737
Comrade_Hedgehog Offline
Member
Comrade_Hedgehog  Offline
Member

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 737
The Sticks, England.
Originally Posted By: PanzerMeyer
Originally Posted By: CG2015
I was just watching the one scene in Star Trek Nemesis, the battle between 2 Romulan Warbirds and the Enterprise against the Scimitar.

It sure didn't take but a few hits from the Scimitar to disable both Warbirds.

What the heck kind of weapons those Warbirds have? Just disruptors against a cloaked warship? Nothing heavier and more powerful and more damaging?

The Enterprise wasn't doing any better at damaging the Scimitar by firing photon torpedoes and quantum torpedoes at it. It might as well be spitting on it.


The Scimitar was a one of a kind ship and it represented the pinnacle of Reman technology thus it was able to easily defeat the Romulan warbirds.


I wonder if the Defiant would've given the Scimitar a run for its money?
Both are designed from the ground up as warships.


Its not the bullet with your name on it you have to worry about.
But the one addressed:
"To Whom It May Concern"
#4086209 - 03/02/15 11:16 AM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,481
PanzerMeyer Online centaurian
Pro-Consul of Florida
PanzerMeyer  Online Centaurian
Pro-Consul of Florida
King Crimson - SimHQ's Top Poster

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,481
Miami, FL USA
The Defiant is a small ship and nowhere near as powerful as a Sovereign class which is what Picard had in Nemesis.


“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
#4086215 - 03/02/15 11:37 AM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: PanzerMeyer]  
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 737
Comrade_Hedgehog Offline
Member
Comrade_Hedgehog  Offline
Member

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 737
The Sticks, England.
Originally Posted By: PanzerMeyer
The Defiant is a small ship and nowhere near as powerful as a Sovereign class which is what Picard had in Nemesis.


Nyah-ah! *Raises finger*

It has:

Reinforced Shielding
Ablative Armour
Sensor arrays you can retract
Phased pulse er, phasers in a fixed forward arc, along with
Quad Torpedo launchers in a coaxial arrangement.
Along with your typical beam phasers.
A super douper 6x photon torpedo warhead (One use only).
And the Warp Nacelles are better protected, (at the cost of efficiency) so have half a chance of running away after a quick 1-2 salvo exchange.

But its biggest advantage is, it has manoeuvrability , it is not a drunken space cow that is the Sovereign class.

According to the DS-9 fluff book, the defiant class was specifically designed as an anti-borg (First contact not with standing.) warship vessel, not a typical, "ship of the line" that is everything else federation.

So it has I dunno, half the hitpoints of the Sovereign?
But 4x times the manoeuvrability.

As usual this is all subject to plot.


Edit:
The point I'm trying to make is the Defiant Class is an out and out warship/escort.
Whereas Galaxy, Sovereign, Excelsior etc etc etc are all "Ships of the line"
Primarily self propelled space stations, exploration, science vessels with a self defence capability bolted on as an after thought.
Not the Defiant, that class is designed to take the fight to the enemy, some in Starfleet high command thought its weapons fit was excessive.

Uh, Hello? Warship?
What part of "War" do you not understand?

And security, pfft.
Don't get me started.
WW1 Doughboys had better survival equipment.

Last edited by Comrade_Hedgehog; 03/02/15 11:53 AM.

Its not the bullet with your name on it you have to worry about.
But the one addressed:
"To Whom It May Concern"
#4086285 - 03/02/15 03:05 PM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,581
Raw Kryptonite Offline
Beat the Kobayashi Maru
Raw Kryptonite  Offline
Beat the Kobayashi Maru
Veteran

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,581
MS
It had to be maneuverable, it was mainly directional weapons. A cruiser or battleship doesn't need to be directional since it can fire in almost all directions without turning. The Defiant wasn't more maneuverable than just angling the phasers a bit. wink
I wonder how Voyager would do? They got upgraded many times with new tech on their trip, becoming pretty formidable.


·Steam: Raw Kryptonite ·MWO & Elite Dangerous: Defcon Won ·Meager youtube channel
·Intel i5-9600K ·EVGA GTX1070 FTW 8GB ·EVGA CLC 120 Cooler
·16 GB Patriot Memory VIPER 4 3000MHz ·GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS PRO WiFi Mobo
· CORSAIR CARBIDE AIR 540 case ·BenQ BL3200PT monitor
#4086287 - 03/02/15 03:07 PM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,700
Peally Offline
Hotshot
Peally  Offline
Hotshot

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,700
Wisconsin, USA
Frankly I'd sooner buy a half-junk freighter with a single phaser taped to the side of it before I'd set foot on any Starfleet ship. Their motto should be "Incompetence for the sake of plot twists" wink


Scully: Victim died of multiple stab wounds.
Mulder: *throws her a file* Ever heard of the knife alien?
#4086289 - 03/02/15 03:10 PM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: Comrade_Hedgehog]  
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,481
PanzerMeyer Online centaurian
Pro-Consul of Florida
PanzerMeyer  Online Centaurian
Pro-Consul of Florida
King Crimson - SimHQ's Top Poster

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,481
Miami, FL USA
Originally Posted By: Comrade_Hedgehog
[The point I'm trying to make is the Defiant Class is an out and out warship/escort.
Whereas Galaxy, Sovereign, Excelsior etc etc etc are all "Ships of the line"
Primarily self propelled space stations, exploration, science vessels with a self defence capability bolted on as an after thought.
Not the Defiant, that class is designed to take the fight to the enemy, some in Starfleet high command thought its weapons fit was excessive.

I recall reading in several Star Trek technical guides that the Sovereign class was made in direct response to the Borg threat. Is that no part of ST canon then?


“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
#4086344 - 03/02/15 04:45 PM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Jedi Master Offline
Entil'zha
Jedi Master  Offline
Entil'zha
Sierra Hotel

Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Space Coast, USA
Yes, but it's the difference between a destroyer and battleship. The Defiant class were "overpowered" for their day-to-day tasks, the engines and weapons being appropriate for a much larger ship.

I've never seen direct comparisons of power, but you can estimate the Defiant should've had the phaser/engine power (torps are torps and irrelevant) of a Galaxy-class ship in a hull a fraction of the size. Due to be being smaller and more nimble, it was more survivable than a big Galaxy in a Borg fight.
The Sovereign came just after the Defiant, and was yet another upgrade to the Galaxy, but it wasn't meant to evade hits like a Defiant but absorb them.

It's not mentioned in the 3 films that showed it, but the Sovereign class had a smaller complement than the Galaxy. About the same sized crew, but no more of the "suburb in space" that the Galaxy was designed around. Instead of 1000, it was down a few hundred. I'm not sure how much of the crews' families were allowed to be on board anymore. I think it was a case of "only if both parents are stationed on board" for children.



The Jedi Master


The anteater is wearing the bagel because he's a reindeer princess. -- my 4 yr old daughter
#4086388 - 03/02/15 05:52 PM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,700
Peally Offline
Hotshot
Peally  Offline
Hotshot

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,700
Wisconsin, USA
Bunch of space hippies can't even get a ship crewed without grandma and the kids coming along.

If a faction came along that wasn't 100% evil or 100% goody-two-shoes... but could have a fleet without spandex clad families onboard and didn't send bridge crews down to do the job of marines... dammit they might actually win!


Scully: Victim died of multiple stab wounds.
Mulder: *throws her a file* Ever heard of the knife alien?
#4086645 - 03/03/15 03:00 AM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,699
NavyNuke99 Offline
One Man Wolfpack
NavyNuke99  Offline
One Man Wolfpack
Hotshot

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,699
Raleigh, NC
I seem to remember the whole, "bring your family to work day" thing went away when the U.S.S. Odyssey offloaded all the families at DS9 before their disastrous encounter with the Jem'Hadar. Because after that, the Federation was pretty much on a war footing from then on out.

As far as the Sovereign class, if Star Trek: Bridge Commander is canon (and I believe it is), the Sovereign was another anti-Borg prototype, yes, but was exceedingly expensive, and some of the more exotic systems didn't play together nicely, which is why she was mothballed, and the Enterprise-E had slightly downgraded shields, weapons, and engines. I think that Defiant would have held her own against say, a Borg Sphere, but from what I remember reading, the original appeal of the Defiant was that the type would be able to be produced rapidly in massive numbers. Imagine what a squadron of the things would've done to a tactical sphere, where the challenge would be bringing any weapons to bear, in any firing arcs, on that many ships attack from independent axes of fire, simultaneously.


" And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the United States Navy.'"- John F. Kennedy

"NUKE-ular. It's pronounced NUKE-ular."- Homer Simpson

AMD FX-8350 Vishera @ 4.0 Ghz
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0
2x 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 @ 1600
Sapphire Radeon HD 7850 2GB
CM Storm Series Trooper
Samsung 840 series 500 GB OS/ Game drive
WD Green 2TB Media Drive
Thermaltake Black Widow 850W PSU
#4086695 - 03/03/15 05:49 AM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,581
Raw Kryptonite Offline
Beat the Kobayashi Maru
Raw Kryptonite  Offline
Beat the Kobayashi Maru
Veteran

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 19,581
MS
It (Defiant) had cloaking ability, so good for recon etc too. What was the difference between the prototype Defiant and the later one?
I wonder how it compares to that prototype ship the Doctor ended up on for that Voyager episode? It had 3 sections to seperate into. The Prometheus or something?


·Steam: Raw Kryptonite ·MWO & Elite Dangerous: Defcon Won ·Meager youtube channel
·Intel i5-9600K ·EVGA GTX1070 FTW 8GB ·EVGA CLC 120 Cooler
·16 GB Patriot Memory VIPER 4 3000MHz ·GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS PRO WiFi Mobo
· CORSAIR CARBIDE AIR 540 case ·BenQ BL3200PT monitor
#4086731 - 03/03/15 10:01 AM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 737
Comrade_Hedgehog Offline
Member
Comrade_Hedgehog  Offline
Member

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 737
The Sticks, England.
Yeah, or Nova.
It was a concurrent project to the Defiant class.

The original Defiant had a Romulan Cloaking Device "on loan"
That ship was destroyed "Due to plot" something about being hit by an EMP weapon.
Knocked all the power out = no emergency force fields = "Lets get the F**k outta here"

A big item that defines the Defiant class is the nacelles are pulled in tight to the hull which reduces the "Shield Bubble" cross section.
Which if you think about it makes sense.

Those big long nacellles of the Sovereign, Galaxy et all need protecting.
and the other thing you almost never see are federation fighters.
(They made a brief cameo in DS9 Dominion war and the game "Star Trek Invasion" on the original Playstation)
Hmm the USS Typhon, now there is a starship.

2-3 squadrons of Valkyries and a Defiant or two in support, that Scimitar would've been toast, even with its "Scorpion class attack fliers"


Its not the bullet with your name on it you have to worry about.
But the one addressed:
"To Whom It May Concern"
#4086749 - 03/03/15 11:43 AM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,552
CG2015 Offline
Senior Member
CG2015  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,552
Didn't they turn a shuttle craft into a mini warship in Voyager?

#4086790 - 03/03/15 01:20 PM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Jedi Master Offline
Entil'zha
Jedi Master  Offline
Entil'zha
Sierra Hotel

Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Space Coast, USA
Yeah, you saw Federation fighters during DS9 in a few wide shots with a lot of ships in it, but they didn't really talk about it much.

As for games being canon, they only are until something else that is contradicts them. smile



The Jedi Master


The anteater is wearing the bagel because he's a reindeer princess. -- my 4 yr old daughter
#4086848 - 03/03/15 02:42 PM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Jayhawk Offline
Silastic Armorfiend
Jayhawk  Offline
Silastic Armorfiend
Hotshot

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,968
Docking Bay 94
Originally Posted By: CG2015
Didn't they turn a shuttle craft into a mini warship in Voyager?


Do you mean the Delta Flyer ?


Why men throw their lives away attacking an armed Witcher... I'll never know. Something wrong with my face?
#4086919 - 03/03/15 04:26 PM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: Jayhawk]  
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,552
CG2015 Offline
Senior Member
CG2015  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,552
Originally Posted By: Jayhawk
Originally Posted By: CG2015
Didn't they turn a shuttle craft into a mini warship in Voyager?


Do you mean the Delta Flyer ?


Yes, that's it.

My memory not as good anymore.

Thanks!

#4087114 - 03/03/15 08:02 PM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Jedi Master Offline
Entil'zha
Jedi Master  Offline
Entil'zha
Sierra Hotel

Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Space Coast, USA
Yes, the oversized shuttle they built out of spare parts! I always thought it a cop-out, I would've preferred it be an alien ship they found or something that they retrofitted with Fed tech a la DS9.

There were too many exceptions to the "stranded on the far side of the galaxy" theme in Voyager to really make it feel like it should have. I guess it would've strayed too far out of the comfort zone for ST at that time to do so. They were willing to push the boundaries only so far, and not as far as many would've liked.



The Jedi Master


The anteater is wearing the bagel because he's a reindeer princess. -- my 4 yr old daughter
#4087129 - 03/03/15 08:24 PM Re: RANT: So what is the deal with the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701? [Re: CG2015]  
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,700
Peally Offline
Hotshot
Peally  Offline
Hotshot

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,700
Wisconsin, USA
Well, I looked up the fighters on the wiki and it looks like they were basically our equivalent to a B-52 bomber in size. I wonder how easy it would be to overrun a fleet with an almost exclusive makeup of capital ships not designed for straight up combat with a carrier and fighter wings.

Time for a Battlestar flight wing versus Enterprise fan fiction. (I know this exists somewhere, please spare me the actual horror of reading it biggrin )


Scully: Victim died of multiple stab wounds.
Mulder: *throws her a file* Ever heard of the knife alien?
Page 3 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  RacerGT 

Quick Search
Recent Articles
Support SimHQ

If you shop on Amazon use this Amazon link to support SimHQ
.
Social


Recent Topics
Roy Cross is 100 Years Old
by F4UDash4. 04/23/24 11:22 AM
Actors portraying US Presidents
by PanzerMeyer. 04/19/24 12:19 PM
Dickey Betts was 80
by Rick_Rawlings. 04/19/24 01:11 AM
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
Grumman Wildcat unique landing gear
by Coot. 04/17/24 03:54 PM
Peter Higgs was 94
by Rick_Rawlings. 04/17/24 12:28 AM
Whitey Herzog was 92
by F4UDash4. 04/16/24 04:41 PM
Anyone can tell me what this is?
by NoFlyBoy. 04/16/24 04:10 PM
Copyright 1997-2016, SimHQ Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0